From: Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com>
To: jes@sgi.com, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/5] prepare XPC and XPNET to support SGI UV -v3
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:25:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080326222548.GF31138@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080326215807.GF31340@sgi.com>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 04:58:07PM -0500, Dean Nelson wrote:
> This set of five patches moves XPC and XPNET to drivers/misc/xp in preparation
> for enabling X86_64 support.
>
> I discovered that the previous versions of this patch were missing the
> replacement of kernel_thread() by kthread_run() and the elimination of
> daemonize().
It looks like patches 3 and 4 of this patchset are too large to be
accepted by the linux-ia64 mailing list (whereas they both do appear
on the linux-kernel mailing list).
-rw-r--r-- 1 dcn os1 204460 2008-03-26 16:36 generic-xp <<< [Patch 3/5]
-rw-r--r-- 1 dcn os1 163339 2008-03-26 16:36 Lindent <<< [Patch 4/5]
So what do I do about them? I'm assuming I need to re-submit the patchset
with these two large patches broken up into multiple smaller patches?
What's the max patch size accepted by linux_ia64 mailing list?
Thanks,
Dean
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com>
To: jes@sgi.com, tony.luck@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/5] prepare XPC and XPNET to support SGI UV -v3
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:25:48 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080326222548.GF31138@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080326215807.GF31340@sgi.com>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 04:58:07PM -0500, Dean Nelson wrote:
> This set of five patches moves XPC and XPNET to drivers/misc/xp in preparation
> for enabling X86_64 support.
>
> I discovered that the previous versions of this patch were missing the
> replacement of kernel_thread() by kthread_run() and the elimination of
> daemonize().
It looks like patches 3 and 4 of this patchset are too large to be
accepted by the linux-ia64 mailing list (whereas they both do appear
on the linux-kernel mailing list).
-rw-r--r-- 1 dcn os1 204460 2008-03-26 16:36 generic-xp <<< [Patch 3/5]
-rw-r--r-- 1 dcn os1 163339 2008-03-26 16:36 Lindent <<< [Patch 4/5]
So what do I do about them? I'm assuming I need to re-submit the patchset
with these two large patches broken up into multiple smaller patches?
What's the max patch size accepted by linux_ia64 mailing list?
Thanks,
Dean
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-26 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-25 19:25 [Patch 0/5] prepare XPC and XPNET to support SGI UV dcn
2008-03-25 19:25 ` dcn
2008-03-25 19:25 ` [Patch 1/5] add multi-page allocation to the uncached allocator dcn
2008-03-25 19:25 ` dcn
2008-03-25 19:25 ` [Patch 3/5] prepare XPC and XPNET for future support of SGIs UV architecture dcn
2008-03-25 19:25 ` [Patch 4/5] run drivers/misc/xp through scripts/Lindent dcn
2008-03-25 19:25 ` [Patch 5/5] run drivers/misc/xp through scripts/checkpatch.pl dcn
2008-03-25 19:25 ` dcn
2008-03-25 20:05 ` Dean Nelson
2008-03-25 20:05 ` Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 10:03 ` Andy Whitcroft
2008-03-26 16:58 ` Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 16:58 ` Dean Nelson
2008-03-25 20:14 ` [Patch 0/5] prepare XPC and XPNET to support SGI UV Dean Nelson
2008-03-25 20:14 ` Dean Nelson
2008-03-25 22:49 ` Luck, Tony
2008-03-25 22:49 ` Luck, Tony
2008-03-25 23:04 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-03-25 23:04 ` Andreas Schwab
2008-03-26 16:38 ` [Patch 0/5] prepare XPC and XPNET to support SGI UV -v2 Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 16:38 ` Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 16:48 ` [Patch 1/5] add multi-page allocation to the uncached allocator -v2 Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 16:48 ` Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 16:50 ` [Patch 2/5] move XP and XPC to drivers/misc/xp -v2 Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 16:50 ` Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 16:51 ` [Patch 3/5] prepare XPC and XPNET for future support of SGIs UV architecture -v2 Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 16:52 ` [Patch 4/5] run drivers/misc/xp through scripts/Lindent -v2 Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 16:53 ` [Patch 5/5] run drivers/misc/xp through scripts/checkpatch.pl -v2 Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 16:53 ` Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 21:58 ` [Patch 0/5] prepare XPC and XPNET to support SGI UV -v3 Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 21:58 ` Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 22:00 ` [Patch 1/5] add multi-page allocation to the uncached allocator -v3 Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 22:00 ` Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 22:02 ` [Patch 2/5] move XP and XPC to drivers/misc/xp -v3 Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 22:02 ` Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 22:03 ` [Patch 3/5] prepare XPC and XPNET for future support of SGIs UV architecture -v3 Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 22:04 ` [Patch 4/5] run drivers/misc/xp through scripts/Lindent -v3 Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 22:05 ` [Patch 5/5] run drivers/misc/xp through scripts/checkpatch.pl -v3 Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 22:05 ` Dean Nelson
2008-03-26 22:25 ` Dean Nelson [this message]
2008-03-26 22:25 ` [Patch 0/5] prepare XPC and XPNET to support SGI UV -v3 Dean Nelson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080326222548.GF31138@sgi.com \
--to=dcn@sgi.com \
--cc=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.