All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, jmorris@namei.org, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:04:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080417170407.1e68dfc8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804171955.46600.paul.moore@hp.com>

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:55:46 -0400
Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com> wrote:

> For what it's worth I just looked over the changes in netnode.c and 
> nothing is jumping out at me.  The changes ran fine for me when tested 
> on the later 2.6.25-rcX kernels but I suppose that doesn't mean a whole 
> lot.

Perhaps it was tested only against slub?  That config uses slab.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, tglx@linutronix.de, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi,
	linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, jmorris@namei.org, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:04:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080417170407.1e68dfc8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804171955.46600.paul.moore@hp.com>

On Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:55:46 -0400
Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com> wrote:

> For what it's worth I just looked over the changes in netnode.c and 
> nothing is jumping out at me.  The changes ran fine for me when tested 
> on the later 2.6.25-rcX kernels but I suppose that doesn't mean a whole 
> lot.

Perhaps it was tested only against slub?  That config uses slab.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-18  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-17 23:03 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 23:03 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 23:24 ` Greg KH
2008-04-17 23:24   ` Greg KH
2008-04-18  0:48   ` Kay Sievers
2008-04-18  0:48     ` Kay Sievers
2008-04-18  1:12     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  1:12       ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  4:07     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  4:07       ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 23:24 ` Dan Williams
2008-04-17 23:24   ` Dan Williams
2008-04-17 23:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 23:40   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  0:14   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  0:14     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  3:05     ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18  3:05       ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18  7:37       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  7:37         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 11:46         ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 11:46           ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 12:34           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 12:34             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 12:41             ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 12:41               ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 13:02               ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18 13:02                 ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18 13:22                 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 13:22                   ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 13:27                   ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18 13:27                     ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18 14:47                     ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 14:47                       ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 16:02                       ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 16:02                         ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 21:54         ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18 21:54           ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-17 23:55 ` Paul Moore
2008-04-17 23:55   ` Paul Moore
2008-04-18  0:04   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-04-18  0:04     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 14:55     ` Paul Moore
2008-04-18 14:55       ` Paul Moore
2008-04-18  1:35   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  1:35     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 14:57     ` Paul Moore
2008-04-18 14:57       ` Paul Moore
2008-04-18  5:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-18  5:49   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-18  6:10   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  6:10     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:19     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  7:19       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  7:28       ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:28         ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  9:28         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  9:28           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 13:58         ` Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good) Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-18 16:57           ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-18  6:40 ` 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good Pekka Enberg
2008-04-18  6:40   ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-18  6:56   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  6:56     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:24   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  7:24     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  7:25     ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-18  7:25       ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-18 10:32     ` James Morris
2008-04-18 10:32       ` James Morris
2008-04-18  7:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  7:09   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  7:50 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:50   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:53   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:53     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:57     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:57     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:57       ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  9:22       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  9:22         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  9:22         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 12:18         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 12:18           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 12:18           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  9:42     ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-18  9:42     ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-18  9:42       ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-18 15:22       ` Alan Stern
2008-04-18 15:22         ` Alan Stern
2008-04-18 15:22         ` Alan Stern
2008-04-18 11:07     ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-18 11:07       ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-18 11:07       ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-18  7:53   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-28 16:42 ` 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface Mel Gorman
2008-04-28 16:59   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-28 16:59     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-29  9:39     ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29  9:39       ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-28 18:44   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-28 18:44     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-29  9:43     ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29  9:43       ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29 15:49       ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29 15:49         ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29 16:58         ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29 16:58           ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29 21:37           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-29 21:37             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-30 11:16             ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-30 11:16               ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080417170407.1e68dfc8.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paul.moore@hp.com \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.