All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, bzolnier@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:59:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080428095924.3b7dfb96.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080428164235.GA29229@csn.ul.ie>

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:42:36 +0100 Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:

> An old T21 is failing to boot and the relevant message appears to be
> 
> [    1.929536] Probing IDE interface ide0...
> [   36.939317] ide0: Wait for ready failed before probe !
> [   37.502676] ide0: DISABLED, NO IRQ
> [   37.506356] ide0: failed to initialize IDE interface
> 
> The owner of ide-mm-ide-add-struct-ide_io_ports-take-2.patch with the
> "DISABLED, NO IRQ" message is cc'd. I've attached the config, full boot log
> and lspci -v for the machine in question. I'll start reverting some of the
> these patches to see if ide-mm-ide-add-struct-ide_io_ports-take-2.patch
> is really the culprit.

ide-mm-ide-add-struct-ide_io_ports-take-2.patch is now in mainline so a
quicky confirmation would be to test Linus's tree.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, bzolnier@gmail.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:59:24 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080428095924.3b7dfb96.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080428164235.GA29229@csn.ul.ie>

On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:42:36 +0100 Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:

> An old T21 is failing to boot and the relevant message appears to be
> 
> [    1.929536] Probing IDE interface ide0...
> [   36.939317] ide0: Wait for ready failed before probe !
> [   37.502676] ide0: DISABLED, NO IRQ
> [   37.506356] ide0: failed to initialize IDE interface
> 
> The owner of ide-mm-ide-add-struct-ide_io_ports-take-2.patch with the
> "DISABLED, NO IRQ" message is cc'd. I've attached the config, full boot log
> and lspci -v for the machine in question. I'll start reverting some of the
> these patches to see if ide-mm-ide-add-struct-ide_io_ports-take-2.patch
> is really the culprit.

ide-mm-ide-add-struct-ide_io_ports-take-2.patch is now in mainline so a
quicky confirmation would be to test Linus's tree.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-04-28 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-04-17 23:03 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 23:03 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 23:24 ` Greg KH
2008-04-17 23:24   ` Greg KH
2008-04-18  0:48   ` Kay Sievers
2008-04-18  0:48     ` Kay Sievers
2008-04-18  1:12     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  1:12       ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  4:07     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  4:07       ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 23:24 ` Dan Williams
2008-04-17 23:24   ` Dan Williams
2008-04-17 23:40 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-17 23:40   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  0:14   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  0:14     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  3:05     ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18  3:05       ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18  7:37       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  7:37         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 11:46         ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 11:46           ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 12:34           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 12:34             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 12:41             ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 12:41               ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 13:02               ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18 13:02                 ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18 13:22                 ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 13:22                   ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 13:27                   ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18 13:27                     ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18 14:47                     ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 14:47                       ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 16:02                       ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 16:02                         ` Vegard Nossum
2008-04-18 21:54         ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-18 21:54           ` Jason Wessel
2008-04-17 23:55 ` Paul Moore
2008-04-17 23:55   ` Paul Moore
2008-04-18  0:04   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  0:04     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 14:55     ` Paul Moore
2008-04-18 14:55       ` Paul Moore
2008-04-18  1:35   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  1:35     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18 14:57     ` Paul Moore
2008-04-18 14:57       ` Paul Moore
2008-04-18  5:49 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-18  5:49   ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-18  6:10   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  6:10     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:19     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  7:19       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  7:28       ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:28         ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  9:28         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  9:28           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 13:58         ` Stack protector build failure (was Re: 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good) Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-18 16:57           ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-04-18  6:40 ` 2.6.25-mm1: not looking good Pekka Enberg
2008-04-18  6:40   ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-18  6:56   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  6:56     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:24   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  7:24     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  7:25     ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-18  7:25       ` Pekka Enberg
2008-04-18 10:32     ` James Morris
2008-04-18 10:32       ` James Morris
2008-04-18  7:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  7:09   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  7:50 ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:50   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:53   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:53     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:57     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:57     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  7:57       ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-18  9:22       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  9:22         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  9:22         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 12:18         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 12:18           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18 12:18           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-04-18  9:42     ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-18  9:42     ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-18  9:42       ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-18 15:22       ` Alan Stern
2008-04-18 15:22         ` Alan Stern
2008-04-18 15:22         ` Alan Stern
2008-04-18 11:07     ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-18 11:07       ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-18 11:07       ` Pavel Machek
2008-04-18  7:53   ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-28 16:42 ` 2.6.25-mm1: Failing to probe IDE interface Mel Gorman
2008-04-28 16:59   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-04-28 16:59     ` Andrew Morton
2008-04-29  9:39     ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29  9:39       ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-28 18:44   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-28 18:44     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-29  9:43     ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29  9:43       ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29 15:49       ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29 15:49         ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29 16:58         ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29 16:58           ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-29 21:37           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-29 21:37             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2008-04-30 11:16             ` Mel Gorman
2008-04-30 11:16               ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080428095924.3b7dfb96.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.