All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
Cc: Louis Rilling <Louis.Rilling@kerlabs.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/3] configfs: Make nested default groups lockdep-friendly
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 22:36:11 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080520153543.4bafcac9@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080520222702.GJ26609@mail.oracle.com>

On Tue, 20 May 2008 15:27:02 -0700
Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 03:13:41PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > 	Louis, what about sticking the recursion level on
> > > configfs_dirent?  That is, you could add sd->s_level and then use
> > > it when needed.  THis would hopefully avoid having to pass the
> > > level as an argument to every function.  Then we can go back to
> > > your original scheme.  If they recurse too much and hit the
> > > lockdep limit, just rewind everything and return -ELOOP.
> > 
> > you can also make a new lockdep key for each level... not pretty
> > but it works
> 
> 	I think that's what we're talking about here.  The toplevel is
> I_MUTEX_PARENT, then each child has a class of (I_MUTEX_CHILD +
> depth), where depth is the value of s_level.  His original try passed
> depth everywhere.  I'm asking him to attach it to the configfs_dirent
> so that the code stays readable.  We run into a depth limit at
> (MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASS - I_MUTEX_PARENT - 1 == 5), which I think is
> probably sane.
> 	Do you mean something else?  Perhaps not starting from
> I_MUTEX_PARENT/CHILD and instead creating CONFIGFS_MUTEX_XXX?

not quite what I meant; what I meant is more like how sched.c deals
with per cpu queues:

(from sched.c)

                spin_lock_init(&rq->lock);
                lockdep_set_class(&rq->lock, &rq->rq_lock_key); 


eg you can override the class (not just add a subclass) for a lock
based on a "key"..

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
To: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
Cc: Louis Rilling <Louis.Rilling@kerlabs.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] configfs: Make nested default groups lockdep-friendly
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 15:35:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080520153543.4bafcac9@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080520222702.GJ26609@mail.oracle.com>

On Tue, 20 May 2008 15:27:02 -0700
Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 03:13:41PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > 	Louis, what about sticking the recursion level on
> > > configfs_dirent?  That is, you could add sd->s_level and then use
> > > it when needed.  THis would hopefully avoid having to pass the
> > > level as an argument to every function.  Then we can go back to
> > > your original scheme.  If they recurse too much and hit the
> > > lockdep limit, just rewind everything and return -ELOOP.
> > 
> > you can also make a new lockdep key for each level... not pretty
> > but it works
> 
> 	I think that's what we're talking about here.  The toplevel is
> I_MUTEX_PARENT, then each child has a class of (I_MUTEX_CHILD +
> depth), where depth is the value of s_level.  His original try passed
> depth everywhere.  I'm asking him to attach it to the configfs_dirent
> so that the code stays readable.  We run into a depth limit at
> (MAX_LOCKDEP_SUBCLASS - I_MUTEX_PARENT - 1 == 5), which I think is
> probably sane.
> 	Do you mean something else?  Perhaps not starting from
> I_MUTEX_PARENT/CHILD and instead creating CONFIGFS_MUTEX_XXX?

not quite what I meant; what I meant is more like how sched.c deals
with per cpu queues:

(from sched.c)

                spin_lock_init(&rq->lock);
                lockdep_set_class(&rq->lock, &rq->rq_lock_key); 


eg you can override the class (not just add a subclass) for a lock
based on a "key"..

  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-20 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-20 16:33 [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC][PATCH 0/3] configfs: Make nested default groups lockdep-friendly Louis Rilling
2008-05-20 16:33 ` Louis Rilling
2008-05-20 16:33 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC][PATCH 1/3] configfs: set CONFIGFS_USET_DEFAULT earlier in configfs_attach_group() Louis Rilling
2008-05-20 16:33   ` Louis Rilling
2008-05-20 16:33 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC][PATCH 2/3] configfs: Silence lockdep when creating nested default groups Louis Rilling
2008-05-20 16:33   ` Louis Rilling
2008-05-20 16:33 ` [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC][PATCH 3/3] configfs: Silence lockdep when destroying " Louis Rilling
2008-05-20 16:33   ` Louis Rilling
2008-05-20 16:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/3] configfs: Make nested default groups lockdep-friendly Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-20 16:58   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-20 17:08   ` Louis Rilling
2008-05-20 17:08     ` Louis Rilling
2008-05-20 21:56   ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joel Becker
2008-05-20 21:56     ` Joel Becker
2008-05-20 22:13     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-20 22:14       ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-20 22:27       ` Joel Becker
2008-05-20 22:27         ` Joel Becker
2008-05-20 22:35         ` Arjan van de Ven [this message]
2008-05-20 22:36           ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Arjan van de Ven
2008-05-20 23:51           ` Joel Becker
2008-05-20 23:51             ` Joel Becker
2008-05-21  9:20             ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-21  9:20               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-21  9:23       ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-21  9:23         ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-21 10:25         ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Louis Rilling
2008-05-21 10:25           ` Louis Rilling
2008-05-21 10:59           ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-21 10:59             ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-05-21 12:54             ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Louis Rilling
2008-05-21 12:54               ` Louis Rilling
2008-05-21 22:09             ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joel Becker
2008-05-21 22:09               ` Joel Becker
2008-05-21  8:13     ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Louis Rilling
2008-05-21  8:13       ` Louis Rilling
2008-05-20 21:41 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joel Becker
2008-05-20 21:41   ` Joel Becker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080520153543.4bafcac9@infradead.org \
    --to=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=Joel.Becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=Louis.Rilling@kerlabs.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.