Re: Accelerometer, Gyros and ADC's etc within the kernel.

[David Brownell <david-b-yBeKhBN/0LDR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>]

On Tuesday 27 May 2008, mark gross wrote:
> 
> > > Another problem area is around SPI itself.  There are variations of
> > > device implementations around chip select polarity, clock biasing
> > > (rising,falling, or midpoint) sampling from one SPI part to the next.
> > 
> > Midpoint?  That's not one I've come across before.  All four
> > standard SPI clock/sample/shift modes are already supported
> > in the SPI framework though.  Ditto active-high chipselects
> > (vs normal active-low) etc.
> 
> Yeah, its one of the sampling modes for the PIC18F4455 its one of the
> master mode sampling options  (see page 194 of
> http://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/en/DeviceDoc/39632D.pdf )

Actually figure 19-3 (p. 198) may be a bit more clear.

Curious.  That PIC18F controller has *three* bits ... equivalents
of CPOL and CPHA, plus a bit saying whether to wait a whole or
half clock after the leading clock edge before sampling it.

A quick survey of some other SPI chips suggests that the most
conventional interpretation is to sample on the trailing edge
of the clock, and not presume long hold times.

I would surely hope the SPI interface spec doesn't have to get
into the mess of timing variations which typify anyone trying to
make memory controllers do the Right thing ... *shudder* ...

- Dave



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/