All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [patch 7/7] powerpc: lockless get_user_pages_fast
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:18:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080611031822.GA8228@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806101159110.17798@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:00:48PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, npiggin@suse.de wrote:
> 
> > Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm.h
> > +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
> > @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static inline int put_page_testzero(stru
> >   */
> >  static inline int get_page_unless_zero(struct page *page)
> >  {
> > -	VM_BUG_ON(PageTail(page));
> > +	VM_BUG_ON(PageCompound(page));
> >  	return atomic_inc_not_zero(&page->_count);
> >  }
> 
> This is reversing the modification to make get_page_unless_zero() usable 
> with compound page heads. Will break the slab defrag patchset.

Is the slab defrag patchset in -mm? Because you ignored my comment about
this change that assertions should not be weakened until required by the
actual patchset. I wanted to have these assertions be as strong as
possible for the lockless pagecache patchset.



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org
Subject: Re: [patch 7/7] powerpc: lockless get_user_pages_fast
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 05:18:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080611031822.GA8228@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806101159110.17798@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 12:00:48PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, npiggin@suse.de wrote:
> 
> > Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm.h
> > +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
> > @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static inline int put_page_testzero(stru
> >   */
> >  static inline int get_page_unless_zero(struct page *page)
> >  {
> > -	VM_BUG_ON(PageTail(page));
> > +	VM_BUG_ON(PageCompound(page));
> >  	return atomic_inc_not_zero(&page->_count);
> >  }
> 
> This is reversing the modification to make get_page_unless_zero() usable 
> with compound page heads. Will break the slab defrag patchset.

Is the slab defrag patchset in -mm? Because you ignored my comment about
this change that assertions should not be weakened until required by the
actual patchset. I wanted to have these assertions be as strong as
possible for the lockless pagecache patchset.


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-11  3:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-05  9:43 [patch 0/7] speculative page references, lockless pagecache, lockless gup npiggin
2008-06-05  9:43 ` npiggin
2008-06-05  9:43 ` [patch 1/7] mm: readahead scan lockless npiggin
2008-06-05  9:43   ` npiggin
2008-06-05  9:43 ` [patch 2/7] radix-tree: add gang_lookup_slot, gang_lookup_slot_tag npiggin
2008-06-05  9:43   ` npiggin
2008-06-05  9:43 ` [patch 3/7] mm: speculative page references npiggin
2008-06-05  9:43   ` npiggin
2008-06-06 14:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-06 14:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-06 16:26     ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-06 16:26       ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-06 16:27     ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-06 16:27       ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-09  4:48   ` Tim Pepper
2008-06-09  4:48     ` Tim Pepper
2008-06-10 19:08   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-10 19:08     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-11  3:19     ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-11  3:19       ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-05  9:43 ` [patch 4/7] mm: lockless pagecache npiggin
2008-06-05  9:43   ` npiggin
2008-06-05  9:43 ` [patch 5/7] mm: spinlock tree_lock npiggin
2008-06-05  9:43   ` npiggin
2008-06-05  9:43 ` [patch 6/7] powerpc: implement pte_special npiggin
2008-06-05  9:43   ` npiggin
2008-06-06  4:04   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-06  4:04     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2008-06-05  9:43 ` [patch 7/7] powerpc: lockless get_user_pages_fast npiggin
2008-06-05  9:43   ` npiggin
2008-06-09  8:32   ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-09  8:32     ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-10  3:15     ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-10  3:15       ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-10 19:00   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-10 19:00     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-11  3:18     ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2008-06-11  3:18       ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-11  4:40       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-11  4:40         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-11  4:41         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-11  4:41           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-11  4:49           ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-11  4:49             ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-11  6:06             ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-11  6:06               ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-11  6:24               ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-11  6:24                 ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-11  6:50                 ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-11  6:50                   ` Andrew Morton
2008-06-11 23:20               ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-11 23:20                 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-06-11  4:47         ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-11  4:47           ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-05 11:53 ` [patch 0/7] speculative page references, lockless pagecache, lockless gup Nick Piggin
2008-06-05 11:53   ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-05 17:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-05 17:33   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-06-06  0:08   ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-06  0:08     ` Nick Piggin
2008-06-06 21:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-06-06 21:32   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080611031822.GA8228@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=npiggin@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=clameter@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.