From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: cluster-devel.redhat.com
Subject: [Cluster-devel] Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC] configfs: Pin configfs subsystems separately from new config_items.
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:36:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080620223614.GD21416@mail.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080620124644.GQ30804@localhost>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 02:46:44PM +0200, Louis Rilling wrote:
> But keeping this last config_item_put() prevents the simplification that I'm
> defending. And I think that the simplification is worth moving this
> config_item_put() before client_drop_item().
I guess I'm not seeing what's simpler. Four lines of
try_module_get() aren't very complex, really. Conversely, having some
functions that *don't* do config_item_get_item() is weird. Not invalid,
just harder to read.
Let's put it on the shelf. What I have with this patch is
really no different in effective behavior.
Joel
--
"When ideas fail, words come in very handy."
- Goethe
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: Louis Rilling <Louis.Rilling@kerlabs.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC] configfs: Pin configfs subsystems separately from new config_items.
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:36:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080620223614.GD21416@mail.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080620124644.GQ30804@localhost>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 02:46:44PM +0200, Louis Rilling wrote:
> But keeping this last config_item_put() prevents the simplification that I'm
> defending. And I think that the simplification is worth moving this
> config_item_put() before client_drop_item().
I guess I'm not seeing what's simpler. Four lines of
try_module_get() aren't very complex, really. Conversely, having some
functions that *don't* do config_item_get_item() is weird. Not invalid,
just harder to read.
Let's put it on the shelf. What I have with this patch is
really no different in effective behavior.
Joel
--
"When ideas fail, words come in very handy."
- Goethe
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker at oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: Louis Rilling <Louis.Rilling@kerlabs.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: Re: [Ocfs2-devel] [RFC] configfs: Pin configfs subsystems separately from new config_items.
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:36:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080620223614.GD21416@mail.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080620124644.GQ30804@localhost>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 02:46:44PM +0200, Louis Rilling wrote:
> But keeping this last config_item_put() prevents the simplification that I'm
> defending. And I think that the simplification is worth moving this
> config_item_put() before client_drop_item().
I guess I'm not seeing what's simpler. Four lines of
try_module_get() aren't very complex, really. Conversely, having some
functions that *don't* do config_item_get_item() is weird. Not invalid,
just harder to read.
Let's put it on the shelf. What I have with this patch is
really no different in effective behavior.
Joel
--
"When ideas fail, words come in very handy."
- Goethe
Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-20 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-17 22:41 [Cluster-devel] [RFC] configfs: Pin configfs subsystems separately from new config_items Joel Becker
2008-06-17 22:41 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-17 22:41 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joel Becker
2008-06-18 12:31 ` Louis Rilling
2008-06-18 12:31 ` Louis Rilling
2008-06-18 16:12 ` [Cluster-devel] " Joel Becker
2008-06-18 16:12 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-18 16:12 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-18 16:51 ` Louis Rilling
2008-06-18 16:51 ` Louis Rilling
2008-06-18 20:07 ` [Cluster-devel] " Joel Becker
2008-06-18 20:07 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-18 20:07 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joel Becker
2008-06-19 11:13 ` Louis Rilling
2008-06-19 11:13 ` Louis Rilling
2008-06-19 22:07 ` [Cluster-devel] " Joel Becker
2008-06-19 22:07 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-19 22:07 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-20 12:46 ` Louis Rilling
2008-06-20 12:46 ` Louis Rilling
2008-06-20 22:36 ` Joel Becker [this message]
2008-06-20 22:36 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-20 22:36 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-23 15:44 ` Louis Rilling
2008-06-23 15:44 ` Louis Rilling
2008-06-23 19:10 ` [Cluster-devel] " Joel Becker
2008-06-23 19:10 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-23 19:10 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-24 5:04 ` Louis Rilling
2008-06-24 5:04 ` Louis Rilling
2008-06-24 17:03 ` [Cluster-devel] " Joel Becker
2008-06-24 17:03 ` Joel Becker
2008-06-24 17:03 ` [Ocfs2-devel] " Joel Becker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080620223614.GD21416@mail.oracle.com \
--to=joel.becker@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.