From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] acpi: semaphore removal
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 20:53:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080808025303.GB8618@parisc-linux.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080808012849.GC24344@disturbed>
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 11:28:49AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > completion_done is an abomination. Stop this.
>
> Say what?
>
> You've had several opportunities to comment on that *you suggested*
> [1]. You did not respond to any of them when it was being discussed
> 6 weeks ago and subsequent resends [2] and now you're saying what
> you suggested is an abortion?
Sorry, I had it confused with these:
http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-06/msg00372.html
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-08 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-07 14:59 [PATCH 0/3] acpi: semaphore removal -v2 Daniel Walker
2008-08-07 14:59 ` [PATCH 1/5] add mutex_lock_timeout() Daniel Walker
2008-08-07 14:59 ` [PATCH 2/5] acpi: add real mutex function calls Daniel Walker
2008-08-07 14:59 ` [PATCH 3/5] acpi: add lockdep magic Daniel Walker
2008-08-07 14:59 ` [PATCH 4/5] acpi: remove interpreter lock Daniel Walker
2008-08-07 14:59 ` [PATCH 5/5] acpi: semaphore removal Daniel Walker
2008-08-08 0:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-08-08 1:00 ` Daniel Walker
2008-08-08 1:28 ` Dave Chinner
2008-08-08 2:53 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2008-08-08 3:47 ` Daniel Walker
2008-08-08 2:44 ` Andi Kleen
2008-08-08 3:35 ` Daniel Walker
2008-08-07 20:32 ` [PATCH 4/5] acpi: remove interpreter lock Moore, Robert
2008-08-07 21:09 ` Daniel Walker
2008-08-07 21:30 ` Moore, Robert
2008-08-08 0:01 ` Daniel Walker
2008-08-08 2:40 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080808025303.GB8618@parisc-linux.org \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.