From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Cc: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
rick.jones2@hp.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Nagle latency tuning
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:00:29 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080909130029.GA12726@ghostprotocols.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080909062208.GB30385@2ka.mipt.ru>
Em Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 10:22:08AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov escreveu:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:56:12AM -0400, Chris Snook (csnook@redhat.com) wrote:
> > The easiest way to see the problem is to open a TCP socket to an echo
> > daemon on loopback, make a bunch of small writes totaling less than your
> > loopback MTU (accounting for overhead), and see how long it takes to get
> > your echoes. You can probably do this with netcat, though I haven't
> > tried. People don't expect loopback to have 40 ms latency when the box
> > is lightly loaded, so they'd really like to tweak that down when it's
> > hurting them.
>
> Isn't Nagle without corking a very bad idea? Or you can not change the
> application?
In one such case, finantial app building logical packets via several
small buffer send calls I got it working with a "autocorking" LD_PRELOAD
library, libautocork:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/acme/libautocork.git
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/libautocork.git
Details/test cases:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/acme/libautocork.git;a=blob_plain;f=tcp_nodelay.txt
How to use it, what you get from using it:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/acme/libautocork.git;a=blob_plain;f=libautocork.txt
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-09 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-08 21:56 RFC: Nagle latency tuning Christopher Snook
2008-09-08 22:39 ` Rick Jones
2008-09-09 5:10 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-09 5:17 ` David Miller
2008-09-09 5:56 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-09 6:02 ` David Miller
2008-09-09 10:31 ` Mark Brown
2008-09-09 12:05 ` David Miller
2008-09-09 12:09 ` Mark Brown
2008-09-09 12:19 ` David Miller
2008-09-09 6:22 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2008-09-09 6:28 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-09 13:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2008-09-09 14:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-09 18:40 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-09 19:07 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-09 19:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-09-11 4:08 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-09 19:59 ` David Miller
2008-09-09 20:25 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-22 10:49 ` David Miller
2008-09-22 11:09 ` David Miller
2008-09-22 20:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-22 22:22 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-22 22:26 ` David Miller
2008-09-22 23:00 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-22 23:13 ` David Miller
2008-09-22 23:24 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-22 23:21 ` David Miller
2008-09-23 0:14 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-23 0:33 ` Rick Jones
2008-09-23 2:12 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-23 1:40 ` David Miller
2008-09-23 2:23 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-23 2:28 ` David Miller
2008-09-23 2:41 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-22 22:47 ` Rick Jones
2008-09-22 22:57 ` Chris Snook
2008-09-09 16:33 ` Rick Jones
2008-09-09 16:54 ` Chuck Lever
2008-09-09 17:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2008-09-09 17:54 ` Rick Jones
2008-09-08 22:55 ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-09 5:22 ` Chris Snook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080909130029.GA12726@ghostprotocols.net \
--to=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=csnook@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.