From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: neilb@suse.de, agk@sourceware.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Block integrity patches for 2.6.28
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2008 12:56:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081002105632.GF19428@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1222846723-18213-1-git-send-email-martin.petersen@oracle.com>
On Wed, Oct 01 2008, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
>
> This patch series contains block layer integrity updates for 2.6.28.
>
> There are a few fixes to the core bits, including a switch from
> block_device to gendisk in the integrity compare function. I also had
> to add a helper to access a gendisk's integrity profile. This is used
> by MD.
>
> The DM bits have been cleaned up and a separate dm_table_set_integrity
> function has been introduced. This allows us to avoid changing
> dm_table_set_restrictions() and its callers.
>
> The MD patch now correctly handles devices that come and go (as
> requested by Neil).
>
> The patches are against for-2.6.28 and depend on
>
> d7533ad0e132f92e75c1b2eb7c26387b25a583c1
As far as I can tell, most of that commit is still fine. You want
bdev_get_integrity() in blkdev.h, the 3 other moves and the unused
bdev_get_tag_size() do not look like they are being used by this patch
set.
Correct?
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-02 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-01 7:38 Block integrity patches for 2.6.28 Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` [PATCH 1/7] block: Introduce integrity data ownership flag Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` [PATCH 2/7] block: Fix double put in blk_integrity_unregister Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` [PATCH 3/7] block: Switch blk_integrity_compare from bdev to gendisk Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` [PATCH 4/7] block: gendisk integrity wrapper Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` [PATCH 5/7] block: Find bio sector offset given idx and offset Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 8:10 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-02 2:42 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-02 2:42 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-02 17:07 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-01 7:38 ` [PATCH 6/7] dm: Add support for data integrity to DM Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` [PATCH 7/7] md: Add support for data integrity to MD Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-02 10:56 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2008-10-02 13:54 ` Block integrity patches for 2.6.28 Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-02 16:29 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-02 16:29 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081002105632.GF19428@kernel.dk \
--to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=agk@sourceware.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.