From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
neilb@suse.de, agk@sourceware.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: Block integrity patches for 2.6.28
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 09:54:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1wsgrgl0o.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081002105632.GF19428@kernel.dk> (Jens Axboe's message of "Thu\, 2 Oct 2008 12\:56\:32 +0200")
>>>>> "Jens" == Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> writes:
Jens> As far as I can tell, most of that commit is still fine. You
Jens> want bdev_get_integrity() in blkdev.h, the 3 other moves and the
Jens> unused bdev_get_tag_size() do not look like they are being used
Jens> by this patch set.
bdev_get_integrity() and bdev_get_tag_size() are being used by
stacking drivers and filesystems to prepare I/O. It's correct that
none of the in-tree stuff currently uses bdev_get_tag_size(). That's
coming with the btrfs support. If you want to pull that out for now
and have me put that back later in that's ok. Just adds another
two-stage merge dependency for a later cycle.
bdev_integrity_enabled() and blk_integrity_tuple_size() are only being
used from within bio-integrity.c and can move there. I originally put
them in blkdev.h because they are block device functions and not bio
ditto.
Want me to submit a new patch shuffling bdev_get_integrity() back
where it came from?
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-02 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-01 7:38 Block integrity patches for 2.6.28 Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` [PATCH 1/7] block: Introduce integrity data ownership flag Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` [PATCH 2/7] block: Fix double put in blk_integrity_unregister Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` [PATCH 3/7] block: Switch blk_integrity_compare from bdev to gendisk Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` [PATCH 4/7] block: gendisk integrity wrapper Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` [PATCH 5/7] block: Find bio sector offset given idx and offset Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 8:10 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-02 2:42 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-02 2:42 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-02 17:07 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-01 7:38 ` [PATCH 6/7] dm: Add support for data integrity to DM Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` [PATCH 7/7] md: Add support for data integrity to MD Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-01 7:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2008-10-02 10:56 ` Block integrity patches for 2.6.28 Jens Axboe
2008-10-02 13:54 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2008-10-02 16:29 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-02 16:29 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1wsgrgl0o.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=agk@sourceware.org \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.