All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, jeremy@goop.org, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	travis@sgi.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, xemul@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/4] cpu alloc: The allocator
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:20:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081003012003.f1f84937.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1223019811.30285.12.camel@penberg-laptop>

On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:43:31 +0300 Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 00:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > +static void set_map(int start, int length)
> > > +{
> > > +	while (length-- > 0)
> > > +		__set_bit(start++, cpu_alloc_map);
> > > +}
> > 
> > Can we use bitmap_fill() here?
> 
> But bitmap_fill() assumes that the starting offset is aligned to
> unsigned long (which is not the case here), doesn't it?

umm, yeah, the whole bitmap interface is busted from that POV.

> ___On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 00:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > But I'd have though that it would be possible to only allocate the
> > storage for online CPUs.  That would be a pretty significant win for
> > some system configurations?
> 
> Maybe, but then you'd have to deal with CPU hotplug... iik.

Of course.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, jeremy@goop.org, ebiederm@xmission.com,
	travis@sgi.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, xemul@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [patch 3/4] cpu alloc: The allocator
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 01:20:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081003012003.f1f84937.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1223019811.30285.12.camel@penberg-laptop>

On Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:43:31 +0300 Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:

> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 00:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > +static void set_map(int start, int length)
> > > +{
> > > +	while (length-- > 0)
> > > +		__set_bit(start++, cpu_alloc_map);
> > > +}
> > 
> > Can we use bitmap_fill() here?
> 
> But bitmap_fill() assumes that the starting offset is aligned to
> unsigned long (which is not the case here), doesn't it?

umm, yeah, the whole bitmap interface is busted from that POV.

> ___On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 00:33 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > But I'd have though that it would be possible to only allocate the
> > storage for online CPUs.  That would be a pretty significant win for
> > some system configurations?
> 
> Maybe, but then you'd have to deal with CPU hotplug... iik.

Of course.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-03  8:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-29 19:35 [patch 0/4] Cpu alloc V6: Replace percpu allocator in modules.c Christoph Lameter
2008-09-29 19:35 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-29 19:35 ` [patch 1/4] Make the per cpu reserve configurable Christoph Lameter
2008-09-29 19:35   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-29 19:35 ` [patch 2/4] percpu: Rename variables PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM -> PERCPU_AREA_SIZE Christoph Lameter
2008-09-29 19:35   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-29 19:35 ` [patch 3/4] cpu alloc: The allocator Christoph Lameter
2008-09-29 19:35   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-30  6:35   ` Pekka Enberg
2008-09-30  6:35     ` Pekka Enberg
2008-09-30 11:38     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-30 11:38       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-30 11:48       ` Pekka Enberg
2008-09-30 11:48         ` Pekka Enberg
2008-09-30 12:12         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-30 12:12           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-03  7:33   ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-03  7:33     ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-03  7:43     ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-03  7:43       ` Pekka Enberg
2008-10-03  8:20       ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-10-03  8:20         ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-03 14:15         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-03 14:15           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-03 12:48     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-03 12:48       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-05 21:10       ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-05 21:10         ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-07 13:27         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-07 13:27           ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-29 19:35 ` [patch 4/4] cpu alloc: Use cpu allocator instead of the builtin modules per cpu allocator Christoph Lameter
2008-09-29 19:35   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-30 22:28   ` Rusty Russell
2008-09-30 22:28     ` Rusty Russell
2008-09-30 22:27 ` [patch 0/4] Cpu alloc V6: Replace percpu allocator in modules.c Rusty Russell
2008-09-30 22:27   ` Rusty Russell
2008-10-07 23:34 ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-07 23:34   ` Andrew Morton
2008-10-08 15:10   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-10-08 15:10     ` Christoph Lameter
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-09-19 14:58 [patch 0/4] Cpu alloc V5: " Christoph Lameter
2008-09-19 14:59 ` [patch 3/4] cpu alloc: The allocator Christoph Lameter
2008-09-19 14:59   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-19 15:23   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-09-19 15:23     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2008-09-19 16:27   ` Eric Dumazet
2008-09-19 16:27     ` Eric Dumazet
2008-09-19 16:49     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-19 16:49       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-19 17:00       ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-19 17:00         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-19 20:32   ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-19 20:32     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-18 23:36 [patch 0/4] Cpu alloc V4: Replace percpu allocator in modules.c Christoph Lameter
2008-09-18 23:36 ` [patch 3/4] cpu alloc: The allocator Christoph Lameter
2008-09-19  7:58   ` Pekka Enberg
2008-09-19 13:11     ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-19 14:12       ` Pekka Enberg
2008-09-19 14:27         ` Christoph Lameter
2008-09-19 14:35           ` Pekka Enberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081003012003.f1f84937.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=travis@sgi.com \
    --cc=xemul@openvz.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.