Re: [PATCH 0/0] Add minimal omap34xx support

[Felipe Balbi <me@felipebalbi.com>]

On Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 08:42:18AM -0400, twebb wrote:
> >
> > Yeah there is active development going on in linux-omap mailing list
> > for the EVMs too. And Mistral's older 5912OSK is probably the best
> > supported omap board in the mainline kernel.
> >
> > Basically adding new boards is just a question of adding the board-*.c
> > file, and .config for the drivers to include. Some board of course
> > have custom devices too.
> >
> > Anyways, we'll add more boards to the mainline kernel later on, but
> > first we have to get the the minimal omap3 support working with
> > mainline kernel.
> >
> 
> I'm not really looking for OMAP35x EVM support in mainline, but in l-o
> git.  And it seems like that's where it's not often mentioned/tested
> against - but beagle, zoom, overo are.  In looking for 35x support, is
> it wrong to focus on l-o git instead of mainline?  Won't support
> always be in l-o first?

beagle and overo runs with 35x processors. And evm development is going
just fine. git log arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap?evm.c will give you
only the board-file changes (not counting drivers).

-- 
balbi