* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-21 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-09-22 6:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-09-22 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 08:54:19PM +0200]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of recent regressions.
|
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
| (either way).
|
|
| Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
| Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (11 days old)
| References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
| Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
|
|
There are really multiple issues touched in report. nmi_watchdog
hangs, rtc device creation, NULL deref...
I've asked Joshua for more information. Since he must to use
netdev tree for a while maybe we could wait 'till next merge
window will be closed and check if nmi_watchdog does work.
So the work in progress.
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-09-22 6:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-09-22 6:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 08:54:19PM +0200]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of recent regressions.
|
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
| (either way).
|
|
| Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
| Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (11 days old)
| References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
| Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
|
There are really multiple issues touched in report. nmi_watchdog
hangs, rtc device creation, NULL deref...
I've asked Joshua for more information. Since he must to use
netdev tree for a while maybe we could wait 'till next merge
window will be closed and check if nmi_watchdog does work.
So the work in progress.
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-09-23 10:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2008-09-23 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov,
Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
> Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
The softlockup issue itself is fixed, but there are issues with
nmi_watchdog. I think we should remove the regression and keep the bug
alive to chase the other issues.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-09-23 10:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2008-09-23 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov,
Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
> Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
The softlockup issue itself is fixed, but there are issues with
nmi_watchdog. I think we should remove the regression and keep the bug
alive to chase the other issues.
Thanks,
tglx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-09-23 10:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
@ 2008-09-23 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-23 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov,
Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt
On Tuesday, 23 of September 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
> > Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
>
> The softlockup issue itself is fixed, but there are issues with
> nmi_watchdog. I think we should remove the regression and keep the bug
> alive to chase the other issues.
Well, for the sake of documentation I'd prefer to close this bug and create a
new non-regression one for the other issues if that's not a problem.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-09-23 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-23 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov,
Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt
On Tuesday, 23 of September 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
> > Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
>
> The softlockup issue itself is fixed, but there are issues with
> nmi_watchdog. I think we should remove the regression and keep the bug
> alive to chase the other issues.
Well, for the sake of documentation I'd prefer to close this bug and create a
new non-regression one for the other issues if that's not a problem.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick periodic()
2008-09-27 15:56 ` =?utf-8?q?[Bug=20#11543]=20kernel=20panic:=20softlockup=20in=20tick_periodic()=20????= Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-09-27 18:50 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-09-27 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 05:56:46PM +0200]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of recent regressions.
|
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
| (either way).
|
|
| Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
| Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (17 days old)
| References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
| Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
|
|
Hi Rafael!
Well, Thomas already explained
| The softlockup issue itself is fixed, but there are issues with
| nmi_watchdog. I think we should remove the regression and keep the bug
| alive to chase the other issues.
|
| Thanks,
|
| tglx
so we either have to change the topic of this bug or better
close it and post new one nmi_watchdog related. I may do so
but since Joshua was opening bug it would be better if he
make such an action. How do you think? (I've asked Joshua
for additional info but it seems he is too busy now)
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick periodic()
@ 2008-09-27 18:50 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-09-27 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 05:56:46PM +0200]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of recent regressions.
|
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
| (either way).
|
|
| Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
| Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (17 days old)
| References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
| Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
|
Hi Rafael!
Well, Thomas already explained
| The softlockup issue itself is fixed, but there are issues with
| nmi_watchdog. I think we should remove the regression and keep the bug
| alive to chase the other issues.
|
| Thanks,
|
| tglx
so we either have to change the topic of this bug or better
close it and post new one nmi_watchdog related. I may do so
but since Joshua was opening bug it would be better if he
make such an action. How do you think? (I've asked Joshua
for additional info but it seems he is too busy now)
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick periodic()
2008-09-27 18:50 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
@ 2008-09-27 19:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-27 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cyrill Gorcunov
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
On Saturday, 27 of September 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 05:56:46PM +0200]
> | This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> | of recent regressions.
> |
> | The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> | from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> | (either way).
> |
> |
> | Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
> | Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
> | Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> | Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (17 days old)
> | References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
> | Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
> | Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> | Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
> |
> |
>
> Hi Rafael!
>
> Well, Thomas already explained
>
> | The softlockup issue itself is fixed, but there are issues with
> | nmi_watchdog. I think we should remove the regression and keep the bug
> | alive to chase the other issues.
> |
> | Thanks,
> |
> | tglx
>
> so we either have to change the topic of this bug or better
> close it and post new one nmi_watchdog related. I may do so
> but since Joshua was opening bug it would be better if he
> make such an action. How do you think? (I've asked Joshua
> for additional info but it seems he is too busy now)
I had tried to close it, but someone reopened it afterwards.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick periodic()
@ 2008-09-27 19:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-09-27 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cyrill Gorcunov
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
On Saturday, 27 of September 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 05:56:46PM +0200]
> | This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> | of recent regressions.
> |
> | The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> | from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> | (either way).
> |
> |
> | Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
> | Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
> | Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
> | Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (17 days old)
> | References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
> | Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> | Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
> | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> |
> |
>
> Hi Rafael!
>
> Well, Thomas already explained
>
> | The softlockup issue itself is fixed, but there are issues with
> | nmi_watchdog. I think we should remove the regression and keep the bug
> | alive to chase the other issues.
> |
> | Thanks,
> |
> | tglx
>
> so we either have to change the topic of this bug or better
> close it and post new one nmi_watchdog related. I may do so
> but since Joshua was opening bug it would be better if he
> make such an action. How do you think? (I've asked Joshua
> for additional info but it seems he is too busy now)
I had tried to close it, but someone reopened it afterwards.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-10-04 17:28 2.6.27-rc8-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-04 17:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-04 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-10-04 17:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-04 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (24 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-10-04 17:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-04 19:44 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-10-04 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 07:32:52PM +0200]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of recent regressions.
|
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
| (either way).
|
|
| Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
| Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (24 days old)
| References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
| Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
|
|
Joshua is testing -rc8 now. He said (in bugzilla entry):
>
> -rc8 proved itself stable for a few days on two test nodes and it's being
> rolled out onto 32 nodes production nodes as I type this. The bug strikes
> somewhat randomly so it'll take time for it to pop up in -rc8 if it's still
> there. Heavy jobs will be running over the weekend and should trip this
> issues if it's still in there...
>
So we're waiting for his verdict.
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-10-04 19:44 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-10-04 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Oct 04, 2008 at 07:32:52PM +0200]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of recent regressions.
|
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| from 2.6.26. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
| (either way).
|
|
| Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
| Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (24 days old)
| References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
| Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
|
Joshua is testing -rc8 now. He said (in bugzilla entry):
>
> -rc8 proved itself stable for a few days on two test nodes and it's being
> rolled out onto 32 nodes production nodes as I type this. The bug strikes
> somewhat randomly so it'll take time for it to pop up in -rc8 if it's still
> there. Heavy jobs will be running over the weekend and should trip this
> issues if it's still in there...
>
So we're waiting for his verdict.
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* 2.6.28-rc1-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27
@ 2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Andrew Morton, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List
[Here's something new, a list of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and
2.6.27. We haven't fixed all of them yet and they're still being reported.
Also, they need to be fixed as well as those introduced later (although they
may be considered as "less important").
Quite frankly, I don't know how this is going to work out, but I thought
it's worth trying. Enjoy! ;-)]
This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and
2.6.27, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.26
and 2.6.27, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2008-10-26 190 34 29
2008-10-04 181 41 33
2008-09-27 173 35 28
2008-09-21 169 45 36
2008-09-15 163 46 32
2008-09-12 163 51 38
2008-09-07 150 43 33
2008-08-30 135 48 36
2008-08-23 122 48 40
2008-08-16 103 47 37
2008-08-10 80 52 31
2008-08-02 47 31 20
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11843
Subject : usb hdd problems with 2.6.27.2
Submitter : Luciano Rocha <luciano-YWehAnL2kLNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-22 16:22 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122469318102679&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11836
Subject : Scheduler on C2D CPU and latest 2.6.27 kernel
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-21 9:59 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122458320502371&w=4
Handled-By : Chris Snook <csnook-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
Subject : 2.6.27: "irq 18: nobody cared" on Toshiba Satellite A100
Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave-qUEp0r/b3FNfOZc0+OmrVg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-19 14:06 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122442552100406&w=4
Handled-By : Stefan Assmann <sassmann-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11830
Subject : disk statistics issue in 2.6.27
Submitter : Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs-qWit8jRvyhWsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-19 11:31 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441671421326&w=4
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11820
Subject : 2.6.27: 0 MHz CPU and wrong system time on AMD Geode system
Submitter : Antipov Dmitry <dmantipov-o+MxOtu4lMCHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-15 6:39 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122405421010969&w=4
Handled-By : Jordan Crouse <jordan.crouse-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11721
Subject : after upgrade to 2.6.27 i cannot navigate
Submitter : Aldo Maggi <sentiniate-IWqWACnzNjyonA0d6jMUrA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-08 08:08 (18 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11699
Subject : 2.6.27-rc-7: BUG: scheduling while atomic, c1e_idle+0x98/0xe0
Submitter : Prakash Punnoor <prakash-HU31jPUvoIKELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-28 17:45 (28 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122262403415629&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11698
Subject : 2.6.27-rc7, freezes with > 1 s2ram cycle
Submitter : Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel-YxZl4NRrHdw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-29 11:29 (27 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122268780926859&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11664
Subject : acpi errors and random freeze on sony vaio sr
Submitter : Giovanni Pellerano <giovanni.pellerano-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-28 03:48 (28 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608
Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-16 23:00 (40 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11607
Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 Bug in tty_chars_in_buffer
Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-15 2:26 (41 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122144565514490&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569
Subject : Panic stop CPUs regression
Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi-Vw/NltI1exuRpAAqCnN02g@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-02 13:49 (54 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (45 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512
Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig"
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (51 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504
Subject : reiserfs BUG in 2.6.27-rc5
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-03 16:35 (53 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476
Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (55 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4
Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Dan Williams <dcbw-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407
Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (66 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org>
Pavel Machek <pavel-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404
Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (66 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4
Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380
Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (67 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340
Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (74 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308
Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (76 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272
Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835
Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (82 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271
Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (82 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98
Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu-W8zweXLXuWQS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264
Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue
Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (80 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220
Subject : Screen stays black after resume
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215
Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210
Subject : libata badness
Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4
Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209
Subject : 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman-8qz54MUs51PtwjQa/ONI9g@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 10:43 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121750102917490&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/30/199
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122470441624295&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Dhaval Giani <dhaval-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Miao Xie <miaox-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11831
Subject : NULL pointer derefence since 2.6.27 in (e)poll
Submitter : Ben Castricum <lk0810-YLO5ZLKhJ/U/fZsR/wcYMA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-19 11:02 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441506419398&w=4
Handled-By : Davide Libenzi <davidel-AhlLAIvw+VEjIGhXcJzhZg@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122428548613067&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11829
Subject : Kernel 2.6.26.5 -> 2.6.27.2 [USB REGRESSION] (USB -> D_STATE)
Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-19 11:26 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441560120027&w=4
Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
Mike Isely <isely-2vzrQ03IO+5eoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2/rev/0bb411d8d2e4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
Subject : when CPU hotplugging is disabled, nr_cpu_ids does not get set properly during boot
Submitter : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-29 11:40 (27 days old)
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
Handled-By : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18105
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550
Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (47 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4
Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman-cENuUygGYd//D1n+0JDH9g@public.gmane.org>
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505
Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine
Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (52 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4
http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins-Et1tbQHTxzrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27, unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11167
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* 2.6.28-rc1-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27
@ 2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Andrew Morton, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List
[Here's something new, a list of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and
2.6.27. We haven't fixed all of them yet and they're still being reported.
Also, they need to be fixed as well as those introduced later (although they
may be considered as "less important").
Quite frankly, I don't know how this is going to work out, but I thought
it's worth trying. Enjoy! ;-)]
This message contains a list of some regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and
2.6.27, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them
have been fixed already, please let me know.
If you know of any other unresolved regressions introduced between 2.6.26
and 2.6.27, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list.
Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid.
Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
issue.
Listed regressions statistics:
Date Total Pending Unresolved
----------------------------------------
2008-10-26 190 34 29
2008-10-04 181 41 33
2008-09-27 173 35 28
2008-09-21 169 45 36
2008-09-15 163 46 32
2008-09-12 163 51 38
2008-09-07 150 43 33
2008-08-30 135 48 36
2008-08-23 122 48 40
2008-08-16 103 47 37
2008-08-10 80 52 31
2008-08-02 47 31 20
Unresolved regressions
----------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11843
Subject : usb hdd problems with 2.6.27.2
Submitter : Luciano Rocha <luciano@eurotux.com>
Date : 2008-10-22 16:22 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122469318102679&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11836
Subject : Scheduler on C2D CPU and latest 2.6.27 kernel
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-10-21 9:59 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122458320502371&w=4
Handled-By : Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
Subject : 2.6.27: "irq 18: nobody cared" on Toshiba Satellite A100
Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave@superonline.com>
Date : 2008-10-19 14:06 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122442552100406&w=4
Handled-By : Stefan Assmann <sassmann@suse.de>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11830
Subject : disk statistics issue in 2.6.27
Submitter : Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net>
Date : 2008-10-19 11:31 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441671421326&w=4
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11820
Subject : 2.6.27: 0 MHz CPU and wrong system time on AMD Geode system
Submitter : Antipov Dmitry <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Date : 2008-10-15 6:39 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122405421010969&w=4
Handled-By : Jordan Crouse <jordan.crouse@amd.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11721
Subject : after upgrade to 2.6.27 i cannot navigate
Submitter : Aldo Maggi <sentiniate@tiscali.it>
Date : 2008-10-08 08:08 (18 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11699
Subject : 2.6.27-rc-7: BUG: scheduling while atomic, c1e_idle+0x98/0xe0
Submitter : Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de>
Date : 2008-09-28 17:45 (28 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122262403415629&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11698
Subject : 2.6.27-rc7, freezes with > 1 s2ram cycle
Submitter : Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de>
Date : 2008-09-29 11:29 (27 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122268780926859&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11664
Subject : acpi errors and random freeze on sony vaio sr
Submitter : Giovanni Pellerano <giovanni.pellerano@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-28 03:48 (28 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608
Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-16 23:00 (40 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11607
Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 Bug in tty_chars_in_buffer
Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-15 2:26 (41 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122144565514490&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569
Subject : Panic stop CPUs regression
Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date : 2008-09-02 13:49 (54 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (45 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512
Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig"
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (51 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504
Subject : reiserfs BUG in 2.6.27-rc5
Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2008-09-03 16:35 (53 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476
Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (55 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4
Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407
Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (66 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404
Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (66 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4
Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380
Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (67 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340
Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (74 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308
Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (76 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272
Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835
Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (82 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271
Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (82 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98
Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264
Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue
Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (80 days old)
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220
Subject : Screen stays black after resume
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico@schottelius.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215
Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210
Subject : libata badness
Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4
Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209
Subject : 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Date : 2008-07-31 10:43 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121750102917490&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/30/199
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122470441624295&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Regressions with patches
------------------------
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11831
Subject : NULL pointer derefence since 2.6.27 in (e)poll
Submitter : Ben Castricum <lk0810@bencastricum.nl>
Date : 2008-10-19 11:02 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441506419398&w=4
Handled-By : Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122428548613067&w=2
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11829
Subject : Kernel 2.6.26.5 -> 2.6.27.2 [USB REGRESSION] (USB -> D_STATE)
Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Date : 2008-10-19 11:26 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441560120027&w=4
Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Mike Isely <isely@isely.net>
Patch : http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2/rev/0bb411d8d2e4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
Subject : when CPU hotplugging is disabled, nr_cpu_ids does not get set properly during boot
Submitter : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Date : 2008-09-29 11:40 (27 days old)
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
Handled-By : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18105
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550
Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (47 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4
Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505
Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine
Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (52 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4
http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4
For details, please visit the bug entries and follow the links given in
references.
As you can see, there is a Bugzilla entry for each of the listed regressions.
There also is a Bugzilla entry used for tracking the regressions introduced
between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27, unresolved as well as resolved, at:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11167
Please let me know if there are any Bugzilla entries that should be added to
the list in there.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dhaval Giani, Miao Xie, Peter Zijlstra,
Zhang, Yanmin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org>
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Dhaval Giani <dhaval-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Miao Xie <miaox-BthXqXjhjHXQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
@ 2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dhaval Giani, Miao Xie, Peter Zijlstra,
Zhang, Yanmin
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11207
Subject : VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Date : 2008-07-31 3:20 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121747464114335&w=4
Handled-By : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11209] 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Lukas Hejtmanek, Peter Zijlstra
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209
Subject : 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman-8qz54MUs51PtwjQa/ONI9g@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 10:43 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121750102917490&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/30/199
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122470441624295&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jean-Luc Coulon
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264
Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue
Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (80 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11210] libata badness
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Kumar Gala
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210
Subject : libata badness
Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4
Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Nico Schottelius
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220
Subject : Screen stays black after resume
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico-xuaVFQXs+5hIG4jRRZ66WA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Peter Zijlstra, Zdenek Kabelac
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215
Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11209] 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Lukas Hejtmanek, Peter Zijlstra
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11209
Subject : 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting
Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Date : 2008-07-31 10:43 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121750102917490&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/9/30/199
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122470441624295&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jean-Luc Coulon
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11264
Subject : Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue
Submitter : Jean-Luc Coulon <jean.luc.coulon@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-07 04:18 (80 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Peter Zijlstra, Zdenek Kabelac
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11215
Subject : INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-07-31 9:41 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121749737011637&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Nico Schottelius
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11220
Subject : Screen stays black after resume
Submitter : Nico Schottelius <nico@schottelius.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 21:05 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121753882422899&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11210] libata badness
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Kumar Gala
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11210
Subject : libata badness
Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Date : 2008-07-31 18:53 (87 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=121753059307310&w=4
Handled-By : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11340] LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Dobriyan
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340
Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (74 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christoph Lameter
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308
Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (76 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jaswinder Singh
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272
Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835
Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (82 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Francois Romieu, Jaswinder Singh
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271
Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (82 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98
Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu-W8zweXLXuWQS+FvcfC7Uqw@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jaswinder Singh
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11272
Subject : BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835
Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-05 15:12 (82 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121794900319776&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Francois Romieu, Jaswinder Singh
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11271
Subject : BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1
Submitter : Jaswinder Singh <jaswinderlinux@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-05 14:58 (82 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=121794762016830&w=4
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/10/98
Handled-By : Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christoph Lameter
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11308
Subject : tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28
Submitter : Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Date : 2008-08-11 18:36 (76 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121847986119495&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122125737421332&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11340] LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Dobriyan
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11340
Subject : LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-13 9:24 (74 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121861951902949&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek, Pekka Enberg,
Rafael J. Wysocki, Vegard Nossum
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407
Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (66 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
Pekka Enberg <penberg-bbCR+/B0CizivPeTLB3BmA@public.gmane.org>
Pavel Machek <pavel-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380
Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (67 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, James Bottomley, Miller, Mike (OS Dev),
rdunlap
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404
Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (66 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4
Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek, Pekka Enberg,
Rafael J. Wysocki, Vegard Nossum
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11407
Subject : suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-08-21 17:28 (66 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121933974928881&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, James Bottomley, Miller, Mike (OS Dev),
rdunlap
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404
Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (66 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4
Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com>
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11380
Subject : lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16
Submitter : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Date : 2008-08-20 6:44 (67 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121921480931970&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11505] oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Gregory Haskins, Ingo Molnar, Lin Ming,
Peter Zijlstra
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505
Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine
Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (52 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4
http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins-Et1tbQHTxzrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11476] failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dan Williams, Jouni Malinen,
Michael S. Tsirkin, Zhu Yi
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476
Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (55 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4
Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Dan Williams <dcbw-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11476] failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dan Williams, Jouni Malinen,
Michael S. Tsirkin, Zhu Yi
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11476
Subject : failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram
Submitter : Michael S. Tsirkin <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-01 13:33 (55 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122028529415108&w=4
Handled-By : Zhu Yi <yi.zhu@intel.com>
Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11505] oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Gregory Haskins, Ingo Molnar, Lin Ming,
Peter Zijlstra
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11505
Subject : oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine
Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Date : 2008-09-04 7:06 (52 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122051202202373&w=4
http://marc.info/?t=122089704700005&r=1&w=4
Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122194673932703&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (45 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Frans Pop, Rene Herman,
Rene Herman
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550
Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil-EIBgga6/0yRmR6Xm/wNWPw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (47 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4
Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman-cENuUygGYd//D1n+0JDH9g@public.gmane.org>
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11512] sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig"
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Dobriyan
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512
Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig"
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (51 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11512] sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig"
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexey Dobriyan
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11512
Subject : sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig"
Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-05 22:50 (51 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122065498013858&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas, Frans Pop, Rene Herman,
Rene Herman
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550
Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Date : 2008-09-09 10:50 (47 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122095745403793&w=4
Handled-By : Rene Herman <rene.herman@keyaccess.nl>
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122246533505643&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (45 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11569] Panic stop CPUs regression
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andi Kleen
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569
Subject : Panic stop CPUs regression
Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi-Vw/NltI1exuRpAAqCnN02g@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-02 13:49 (54 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11664] acpi errors and random freeze on sony vaio sr
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Giovanni Pellerano
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11664
Subject : acpi errors and random freeze on sony vaio sr
Submitter : Giovanni Pellerano <giovanni.pellerano-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-28 03:48 (28 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11669] when CPU hotplugging is disabled, nr_cpu_ids does not get set properly during boot
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Chuck Ebbert
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
Subject : when CPU hotplugging is disabled, nr_cpu_ids does not get set properly during boot
Submitter : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-29 11:40 (27 days old)
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
Handled-By : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18105
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11608] 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, John Daiker
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608
Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-16 23:00 (40 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11569] Panic stop CPUs regression
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andi Kleen
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11569
Subject : Panic stop CPUs regression
Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date : 2008-09-02 13:49 (54 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122036356127282&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11664] acpi errors and random freeze on sony vaio sr
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Giovanni Pellerano
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11664
Subject : acpi errors and random freeze on sony vaio sr
Submitter : Giovanni Pellerano <giovanni.pellerano@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-28 03:48 (28 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11608] 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, John Daiker
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11608
Subject : 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request
Submitter : John Daiker <daikerjohn@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-09-16 23:00 (40 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122160611517267&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11669] when CPU hotplugging is disabled, nr_cpu_ids does not get set properly during boot
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Chuck Ebbert
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
Subject : when CPU hotplugging is disabled, nr_cpu_ids does not get set properly during boot
Submitter : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Date : 2008-09-29 11:40 (27 days old)
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
Handled-By : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18105
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11698] 2.6.27-rc7, freezes with > 1 s2ram cycle
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki, Soeren Sonnenburg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11698
Subject : 2.6.27-rc7, freezes with > 1 s2ram cycle
Submitter : Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel-YxZl4NRrHdw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-29 11:29 (27 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122268780926859&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11699] 2.6.27-rc-7: BUG: scheduling while atomic, c1e_idle+0x98/0xe0
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Prakash Punnoor, Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11699
Subject : 2.6.27-rc-7: BUG: scheduling while atomic, c1e_idle+0x98/0xe0
Submitter : Prakash Punnoor <prakash-HU31jPUvoIKELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-28 17:45 (28 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122262403415629&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11698] 2.6.27-rc7, freezes with > 1 s2ram cycle
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Rafael J. Wysocki, Soeren Sonnenburg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11698
Subject : 2.6.27-rc7, freezes with > 1 s2ram cycle
Submitter : Soeren Sonnenburg <kernel@nn7.de>
Date : 2008-09-29 11:29 (27 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122268780926859&w=4
Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11699] 2.6.27-rc-7: BUG: scheduling while atomic, c1e_idle+0x98/0xe0
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Prakash Punnoor, Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11699
Subject : 2.6.27-rc-7: BUG: scheduling while atomic, c1e_idle+0x98/0xe0
Submitter : Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de>
Date : 2008-09-28 17:45 (28 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122262403415629&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11721] after upgrade to 2.6.27 i cannot navigate
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Aldo Maggi, Ilpo J�rvinen
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11721
Subject : after upgrade to 2.6.27 i cannot navigate
Submitter : Aldo Maggi <sentiniate-IWqWACnzNjyonA0d6jMUrA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-08 08:08 (18 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11721] after upgrade to 2.6.27 i cannot navigate
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Aldo Maggi, Ilpo J�rvinen
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11721
Subject : after upgrade to 2.6.27 i cannot navigate
Submitter : Aldo Maggi <sentiniate@tiscali.it>
Date : 2008-10-08 08:08 (18 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11829] Kernel 2.6.26.5 -> 2.6.27.2 [USB REGRESSION] (USB -> D_STATE)
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Justin Piszcz, Mike Isely
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11829
Subject : Kernel 2.6.26.5 -> 2.6.27.2 [USB REGRESSION] (USB -> D_STATE)
Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz-BP4nVm5VUdNhbmWW9KSYcQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-19 11:26 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441560120027&w=4
Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern-nwvwT67g6+6dFdvTe/nMLpVzexx5G7lz@public.gmane.org>
Mike Isely <isely-2vzrQ03IO+5eoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2/rev/0bb411d8d2e4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11820] 2.6.27: 0 MHz CPU and wrong system time on AMD Geode system
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Antipov Dmitry, Jordan Crouse
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11820
Subject : 2.6.27: 0 MHz CPU and wrong system time on AMD Geode system
Submitter : Antipov Dmitry <dmantipov-o+MxOtu4lMCHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-15 6:39 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122405421010969&w=4
Handled-By : Jordan Crouse <jordan.crouse-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11830] disk statistics issue in 2.6.27
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jens Axboe, Miquel van Smoorenburg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11830
Subject : disk statistics issue in 2.6.27
Submitter : Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs-qWit8jRvyhWsTnJN9+BGXg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-19 11:31 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441671421326&w=4
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11831] NULL pointer derefence since 2.6.27 in (e)poll
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ben Castricum, Davide Libenzi
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11831
Subject : NULL pointer derefence since 2.6.27 in (e)poll
Submitter : Ben Castricum <lk0810-YLO5ZLKhJ/U/fZsR/wcYMA@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-19 11:02 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441506419398&w=4
Handled-By : Davide Libenzi <davidel-AhlLAIvw+VEjIGhXcJzhZg@public.gmane.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122428548613067&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11820] 2.6.27: 0 MHz CPU and wrong system time on AMD Geode system
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Antipov Dmitry, Jordan Crouse
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11820
Subject : 2.6.27: 0 MHz CPU and wrong system time on AMD Geode system
Submitter : Antipov Dmitry <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Date : 2008-10-15 6:39 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122405421010969&w=4
Handled-By : Jordan Crouse <jordan.crouse@amd.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11829] Kernel 2.6.26.5 -> 2.6.27.2 [USB REGRESSION] (USB -> D_STATE)
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Stern, Justin Piszcz, Mike Isely
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11829
Subject : Kernel 2.6.26.5 -> 2.6.27.2 [USB REGRESSION] (USB -> D_STATE)
Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Date : 2008-10-19 11:26 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441560120027&w=4
Handled-By : Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Mike Isely <isely@isely.net>
Patch : http://linuxtv.org/hg/~mcisely/pvrusb2/rev/0bb411d8d2e4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11830] disk statistics issue in 2.6.27
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Jens Axboe, Miquel van Smoorenburg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11830
Subject : disk statistics issue in 2.6.27
Submitter : Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@xs4all.net>
Date : 2008-10-19 11:31 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441671421326&w=4
Handled-By : Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11831] NULL pointer derefence since 2.6.27 in (e)poll
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ben Castricum, Davide Libenzi
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11831
Subject : NULL pointer derefence since 2.6.27 in (e)poll
Submitter : Ben Castricum <lk0810@bencastricum.nl>
Date : 2008-10-19 11:02 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122441506419398&w=4
Handled-By : Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122428548613067&w=2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11832] 2.6.27: "irq 18: nobody cared" on Toshiba Satellite A100
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, M. Vefa Bicakci, Stefan Assmann
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
Subject : 2.6.27: "irq 18: nobody cared" on Toshiba Satellite A100
Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave-qUEp0r/b3FNfOZc0+OmrVg@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-19 14:06 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122442552100406&w=4
Handled-By : Stefan Assmann <sassmann-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11843] usb hdd problems with 2.6.27.2
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Luciano Rocha
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11843
Subject : usb hdd problems with 2.6.27.2
Submitter : Luciano Rocha <luciano-YWehAnL2kLNBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-22 16:22 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122469318102679&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11836] Scheduler on C2D CPU and latest 2.6.27 kernel
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Chris Snook, Zdenek Kabelac
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11836
Subject : Scheduler on C2D CPU and latest 2.6.27 kernel
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-10-21 9:59 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122458320502371&w=4
Handled-By : Chris Snook <csnook-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11832] 2.6.27: "irq 18: nobody cared" on Toshiba Satellite A100
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, M. Vefa Bicakci, Stefan Assmann
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11832
Subject : 2.6.27: "irq 18: nobody cared" on Toshiba Satellite A100
Submitter : M. Vefa Bicakci <bicave@superonline.com>
Date : 2008-10-19 14:06 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122442552100406&w=4
Handled-By : Stefan Assmann <sassmann@suse.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11836] Scheduler on C2D CPU and latest 2.6.27 kernel
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Chris Snook, Zdenek Kabelac
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11836
Subject : Scheduler on C2D CPU and latest 2.6.27 kernel
Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com>
Date : 2008-10-21 9:59 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122458320502371&w=4
Handled-By : Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11843] usb hdd problems with 2.6.27.2
@ 2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-25 21:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Luciano Rocha
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11843
Subject : usb hdd problems with 2.6.27.2
Submitter : Luciano Rocha <luciano@eurotux.com>
Date : 2008-10-22 16:22 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122469318102679&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-25 23:24 ` Randy Dunlap
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2008-10-25 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, James Bottomley,
Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:07:47 +0200 (CEST) Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
Yes, it should still be listed.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404
> Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
> Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (66 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4
> Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller-VXdhtT5mjnY@public.gmane.org>
> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley-JuX6DAaQMKPCXq6kfMZ53/egYHeGw8Jk@public.gmane.org>
---
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
@ 2008-10-25 23:24 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2008-10-25 23:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, James Bottomley,
Miller, Mike (OS Dev)
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:07:47 +0200 (CEST) Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
Yes, it should still be listed.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11404
> Subject : BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr
> Submitter : rdunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> Date : 2008-08-21 5:52 (66 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121929819616273&w=4
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121932889105368&w=4
> Handled-By : Miller, Mike (OS Dev) <Mike.Miller@hp.com>
> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
---
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11504] reiserfs ????BUG in 2.6.27-rc5
[not found] ` <gLTYxg3cC1.A.Z_F.-K6AJB@chimera>
@ 2008-10-25 23:55 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2008-10-25 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
I believe this to be a valid bug report, but there doesn't appear to be
anyone to be interested in working on it. It can be killed off.
I no longer care about it.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504
> Subject : reiserfs BUG in 2.6.27-rc5
> Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2008-09-03 16:35 (53 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4
--
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11504] reiserfs ????BUG in 2.6.27-rc5
@ 2008-10-25 23:55 ` Randy Dunlap
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Randy Dunlap @ 2008-10-25 23:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
I believe this to be a valid bug report, but there doesn't appear to be
anyone to be interested in working on it. It can be killed off.
I no longer care about it.
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504
> Subject : reiserfs BUG in 2.6.27-rc5
> Submitter : Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
> Date : 2008-09-03 16:35 (53 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122045982120138&w=4
--
~Randy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11721] after upgrade to 2.6.27 i cannot navigate
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-26 5:02 ` David Miller
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2008-10-26 5:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
kernel-testers-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
sentiniate-IWqWACnzNjyonA0d6jMUrA,
ilpo.jarvinen-pxSi+dnQzZMxHbG02/KK1g
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:07:52 +0200 (CEST)
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11721
> Subject : after upgrade to 2.6.27 i cannot navigate
> Submitter : Aldo Maggi <sentiniate-IWqWACnzNjyonA0d6jMUrA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2008-10-08 08:08 (18 days old)
Should be fixed by:
commit fd6149d332973bafa50f03ddb0ea9513e67f4517
Author: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen-pxSi+dnQzZMxHbG02/KK1g@public.gmane.org>
Date: Thu Oct 23 14:06:35 2008 -0700
tcp: Restore ordering of TCP options for the sake of inter-operability
This is not our bug! Sadly some devices cannot cope with the change
of TCP option ordering which was a result of the recent rewrite of
the option code (not that there was some particular reason steming
from the rewrite for the reordering) though any ordering of TCP
options is perfectly legal. Thus we restore the original ordering
to allow interoperability with/through such broken devices and add
some warning about this trap. Since the reordering just happened
without any particular reason, this change shouldn't cost us
anything.
There are already couple of known failure reports (within close
proximity of the last release), so the problem might be more
wide-spread than a single device. And other reports which may
be due to the same problem though the symptoms were less obvious.
Analysis of one of the case revealed (with very high probability)
that sack capability cannot be negotiated as the first option
(SYN never got a response).
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen-pxSi+dnQzZMxHbG02/KK1g@public.gmane.org>
Reported-by: Aldo Maggi <sentiniate-IWqWACnzNjyonA0d6jMUrA@public.gmane.org>
Tested-by: Aldo Maggi <sentiniate-IWqWACnzNjyonA0d6jMUrA@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index de54f02..e4c5ac9 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -362,6 +362,17 @@ struct tcp_out_options {
__u32 tsval, tsecr; /* need to include OPTION_TS */
};
+/* Beware: Something in the Internet is very sensitive to the ordering of
+ * TCP options, we learned this through the hard way, so be careful here.
+ * Luckily we can at least blame others for their non-compliance but from
+ * inter-operatibility perspective it seems that we're somewhat stuck with
+ * the ordering which we have been using if we want to keep working with
+ * those broken things (not that it currently hurts anybody as there isn't
+ * particular reason why the ordering would need to be changed).
+ *
+ * At least SACK_PERM as the first option is known to lead to a disaster
+ * (but it may well be that other scenarios fail similarly).
+ */
static void tcp_options_write(__be32 *ptr, struct tcp_sock *tp,
const struct tcp_out_options *opts,
__u8 **md5_hash) {
@@ -376,6 +387,12 @@ static void tcp_options_write(__be32 *ptr, struct tcp_sock *tp,
*md5_hash = NULL;
}
+ if (unlikely(opts->mss)) {
+ *ptr++ = htonl((TCPOPT_MSS << 24) |
+ (TCPOLEN_MSS << 16) |
+ opts->mss);
+ }
+
if (likely(OPTION_TS & opts->options)) {
if (unlikely(OPTION_SACK_ADVERTISE & opts->options)) {
*ptr++ = htonl((TCPOPT_SACK_PERM << 24) |
@@ -392,12 +409,6 @@ static void tcp_options_write(__be32 *ptr, struct tcp_sock *tp,
*ptr++ = htonl(opts->tsecr);
}
- if (unlikely(opts->mss)) {
- *ptr++ = htonl((TCPOPT_MSS << 24) |
- (TCPOLEN_MSS << 16) |
- opts->mss);
- }
-
if (unlikely(OPTION_SACK_ADVERTISE & opts->options &&
!(OPTION_TS & opts->options))) {
*ptr++ = htonl((TCPOPT_NOP << 24) |
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11721] after upgrade to 2.6.27 i cannot navigate
@ 2008-10-26 5:02 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2008-10-26 5:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw; +Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-testers, sentiniate, ilpo.jarvinen
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:07:52 +0200 (CEST)
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11721
> Subject : after upgrade to 2.6.27 i cannot navigate
> Submitter : Aldo Maggi <sentiniate@tiscali.it>
> Date : 2008-10-08 08:08 (18 days old)
Should be fixed by:
commit fd6149d332973bafa50f03ddb0ea9513e67f4517
Author: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Date: Thu Oct 23 14:06:35 2008 -0700
tcp: Restore ordering of TCP options for the sake of inter-operability
This is not our bug! Sadly some devices cannot cope with the change
of TCP option ordering which was a result of the recent rewrite of
the option code (not that there was some particular reason steming
from the rewrite for the reordering) though any ordering of TCP
options is perfectly legal. Thus we restore the original ordering
to allow interoperability with/through such broken devices and add
some warning about this trap. Since the reordering just happened
without any particular reason, this change shouldn't cost us
anything.
There are already couple of known failure reports (within close
proximity of the last release), so the problem might be more
wide-spread than a single device. And other reports which may
be due to the same problem though the symptoms were less obvious.
Analysis of one of the case revealed (with very high probability)
that sack capability cannot be negotiated as the first option
(SYN never got a response).
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Reported-by: Aldo Maggi <sentiniate@tiscali.it>
Tested-by: Aldo Maggi <sentiniate@tiscali.it>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
index de54f02..e4c5ac9 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_output.c
@@ -362,6 +362,17 @@ struct tcp_out_options {
__u32 tsval, tsecr; /* need to include OPTION_TS */
};
+/* Beware: Something in the Internet is very sensitive to the ordering of
+ * TCP options, we learned this through the hard way, so be careful here.
+ * Luckily we can at least blame others for their non-compliance but from
+ * inter-operatibility perspective it seems that we're somewhat stuck with
+ * the ordering which we have been using if we want to keep working with
+ * those broken things (not that it currently hurts anybody as there isn't
+ * particular reason why the ordering would need to be changed).
+ *
+ * At least SACK_PERM as the first option is known to lead to a disaster
+ * (but it may well be that other scenarios fail similarly).
+ */
static void tcp_options_write(__be32 *ptr, struct tcp_sock *tp,
const struct tcp_out_options *opts,
__u8 **md5_hash) {
@@ -376,6 +387,12 @@ static void tcp_options_write(__be32 *ptr, struct tcp_sock *tp,
*md5_hash = NULL;
}
+ if (unlikely(opts->mss)) {
+ *ptr++ = htonl((TCPOPT_MSS << 24) |
+ (TCPOLEN_MSS << 16) |
+ opts->mss);
+ }
+
if (likely(OPTION_TS & opts->options)) {
if (unlikely(OPTION_SACK_ADVERTISE & opts->options)) {
*ptr++ = htonl((TCPOPT_SACK_PERM << 24) |
@@ -392,12 +409,6 @@ static void tcp_options_write(__be32 *ptr, struct tcp_sock *tp,
*ptr++ = htonl(opts->tsecr);
}
- if (unlikely(opts->mss)) {
- *ptr++ = htonl((TCPOPT_MSS << 24) |
- (TCPOLEN_MSS << 16) |
- opts->mss);
- }
-
if (unlikely(OPTION_SACK_ADVERTISE & opts->options &&
!(OPTION_TS & opts->options))) {
*ptr++ = htonl((TCPOPT_NOP << 24) |
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-26 7:11 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-10-26 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:07:49PM +0200]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
|
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
| be listed and let me know (either way).
|
|
| Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
| Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (45 days old)
| References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
| Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
|
|
It's still there but with completely out of 'subject' problems.
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-10-26 7:11 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-10-26 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:07:49PM +0200]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
|
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
| be listed and let me know (either way).
|
|
| Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
| Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (45 days old)
| References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
| Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
|
It's still there but with completely out of 'subject' problems.
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-10-26 7:11 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
@ 2008-10-26 11:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-26 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cyrill Gorcunov
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
On Sunday, 26 of October 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:07:49PM +0200]
> | This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> | of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
> |
> | The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> | introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
> | be listed and let me know (either way).
> |
> |
> | Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
> | Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
> | Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> | Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (45 days old)
> | References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
> | Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
> | Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> | Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
> |
> |
>
> It's still there but with completely out of 'subject' problems.
OK, what subject will be more appropriate?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-10-26 11:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-26 11:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cyrill Gorcunov
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
On Sunday, 26 of October 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> [Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:07:49PM +0200]
> | This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> | of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
> |
> | The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> | introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
> | be listed and let me know (either way).
> |
> |
> | Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
> | Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
> | Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
> | Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (45 days old)
> | References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
> | Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> | Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
> | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> |
> |
>
> It's still there but with completely out of 'subject' problems.
OK, what subject will be more appropriate?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-10-26 11:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-26 11:20 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-10-26 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:03:42PM +0100]
| On Sunday, 26 of October 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| > [Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:07:49PM +0200]
| > | This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| > | of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
| > |
| > | The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| > | introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
| > | be listed and let me know (either way).
| > |
| > |
| > | Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| > | Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| > | Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
| > | Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (45 days old)
| > | References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| > | Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
| > | Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
| > | Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
| > |
| > |
| >
| > It's still there but with completely out of 'subject' problems.
|
| OK, what subject will be more appropriate?
|
| Rafael
|
Not sure Rafael -- now Joshua have different type
of kernel errors -- and NULL deref and do_IRQ hang.
Joshua?
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-10-26 11:20 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-10-26 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:03:42PM +0100]
| On Sunday, 26 of October 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
| > [Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:07:49PM +0200]
| > | This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| > | of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
| > |
| > | The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| > | introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
| > | be listed and let me know (either way).
| > |
| > |
| > | Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| > | Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| > | Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
| > | Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (45 days old)
| > | References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| > | Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
| > | Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
| > | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
| > |
| > |
| >
| > It's still there but with completely out of 'subject' problems.
|
| OK, what subject will be more appropriate?
|
| Rafael
|
Not sure Rafael -- now Joshua have different type
of kernel errors -- and NULL deref and do_IRQ hang.
Joshua?
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-26 16:43 ` Frans Pop
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Frans Pop @ 2008-10-26 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas,
Rene Herman, Rene Herman
On Saturday 25 October 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550
> Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
AFAIK the issue should still be listed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
@ 2008-10-26 16:43 ` Frans Pop
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Frans Pop @ 2008-10-26 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Bjorn Helgaas,
Rene Herman, Rene Herman
On Saturday 25 October 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11550
> Subject : pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages
AFAIK the issue should still be listed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11669] when CPU hotplugging is disabled, nr_cpu_ids does not get set properly during boot
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-10-26 22:00 ` Chuck Ebbert
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Ebbert @ 2008-10-26 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:07:50 +0200 (CEST)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
> Subject : when CPU hotplugging is disabled, nr_cpu_ids does not get set properly during boot
> Submitter : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Date : 2008-09-29 11:40 (27 days old)
> References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
> Handled-By : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18105
>
>
Fixed by commit 14adf855baefad5ac3b545be23a64e6b61d6b74a
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11669] when CPU hotplugging is disabled, nr_cpu_ids does not get set properly during boot
@ 2008-10-26 22:00 ` Chuck Ebbert
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Chuck Ebbert @ 2008-10-26 22:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:07:50 +0200 (CEST)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
> be listed and let me know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
> Subject : when CPU hotplugging is disabled, nr_cpu_ids does not get set properly during boot
> Submitter : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
> Date : 2008-09-29 11:40 (27 days old)
> References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
> Handled-By : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18105
>
>
Fixed by commit 14adf855baefad5ac3b545be23a64e6b61d6b74a
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11669] when CPU hotplugging is disabled, nr_cpu_ids does not get set properly during boot
2008-10-26 22:00 ` Chuck Ebbert
@ 2008-10-26 22:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-26 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Ebbert; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sunday, 26 of October 2008, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:07:50 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
> > Subject : when CPU hotplugging is disabled, nr_cpu_ids does not get set properly during boot
> > Submitter : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Date : 2008-09-29 11:40 (27 days old)
> > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
> > Handled-By : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
> > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18105
> >
> >
>
> Fixed by commit 14adf855baefad5ac3b545be23a64e6b61d6b74a
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11669] when CPU hotplugging is disabled, nr_cpu_ids does not get set properly during boot
@ 2008-10-26 22:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-10-26 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chuck Ebbert; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Sunday, 26 of October 2008, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Oct 2008 23:07:50 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
> > Subject : when CPU hotplugging is disabled, nr_cpu_ids does not get set properly during boot
> > Submitter : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
> > Date : 2008-09-29 11:40 (27 days old)
> > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11669
> > Handled-By : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
> > Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=18105
> >
> >
>
> Fixed by commit 14adf855baefad5ac3b545be23a64e6b61d6b74a
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-11-02 16:47 2.6.28-rc2-git7: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-02 16:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (53 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-11-02 16:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-02 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (53 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-11-02 16:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-03 7:22 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-11-03 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 05:49:34PM +0100]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
|
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
| be listed and let me know (either way).
|
|
| Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
| Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (53 days old)
| References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
| Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
|
|
Still in progress
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-11-03 7:22 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-11-03 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 05:49:34PM +0100]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
|
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
| be listed and let me know (either way).
|
|
| Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
| Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (53 days old)
| References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
| Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
|
|
Still in progress
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-11-09 19:40 2.6.28-rc3-git6: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-09 19:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-09 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (60 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-11-09 19:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-09 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (60 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-11-09 19:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-10 16:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-11-10 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 08:43:19PM +0100]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
|
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
| be listed and let me know (either way).
|
|
| Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
| Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (60 days old)
| References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
| Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
|
|
Waiting for info from Joshua
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-11-10 16:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-11-10 16:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 08:43:19PM +0100]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
|
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
| be listed and let me know (either way).
|
|
| Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
| Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (60 days old)
| References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
| Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
|
|
Waiting for info from Joshua
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-11-16 17:38 2.6.28-rc5: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-16 17:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-16 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (67 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-11-16 17:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-16 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (67 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-11-22 20:57 2.6.28-rc6-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-22 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-22 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (73 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-11-22 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-11-22 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (73 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-11-22 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-11-23 8:06 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-11-23 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 09:59:19PM +0100]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
|
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
| be listed and let me know (either way).
|
|
| Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
| Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (73 days old)
| References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
| Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
|
|
Hi Rafael, it's still there. Joshua is collecting data.
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-11-23 8:06 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-11-23 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 09:59:19PM +0100]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
|
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
| be listed and let me know (either way).
|
|
| Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
| Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (73 days old)
| References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
| Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
|
|
Hi Rafael, it's still there. Joshua is collecting data.
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-12-03 22:38 2.6.28-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-12-03 22:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-12-03 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (84 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-12-03 22:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-12-03 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (84 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-12-03 22:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-12-04 16:36 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-12-04 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:40:29PM +0100]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
|
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
| be listed and let me know (either way).
|
|
| Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
| Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (84 days old)
| References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
| Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
|
|
info needed
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-12-04 16:36 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Cyrill Gorcunov @ 2008-12-04 16:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Ingo Molnar,
Joshua Hoblitt, Thomas Gleixner
[Rafael J. Wysocki - Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 11:40:29PM +0100]
| This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
| of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
|
| The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
| introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
| be listed and let me know (either way).
|
|
| Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
| Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
| Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
| Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (84 days old)
| References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
| Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
| Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
| Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
|
|
info needed
- Cyrill -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
2008-12-07 20:39 2.6.28-rc8-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2008-12-07 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-12-07 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel-amK9oZtvyLhBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (88 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Ingo Molnar <mingo-X9Un+BFzKDI@public.gmane.org>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
* [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
@ 2008-12-07 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 120+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2008-12-07 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Cyrill Gorcunov, Ingo Molnar, Joshua Hoblitt,
Thomas Gleixner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of regressions introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
introduced between 2.6.26 and 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should
be listed and let me know (either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11543
Subject : kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ???
Submitter : Joshua Hoblitt <j_kernel@hoblitt.com>
Date : 2008-09-11 16:46 (88 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122117786124326&w=4
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 120+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-07 22:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 120+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-25 21:04 2.6.28-rc1-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:04 ` [Bug #11207] VolanoMark regression with 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11264] Invalid op opcode in kernel/workqueue Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11209] 2.6.27-rc1 process time accounting Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11220] Screen stays black after resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11210] libata badness Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11271] BUG: fealnx in 2.6.27-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11340] LTP overnight run resulted in unusable box Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11272] BUG: parport_serial in 2.6.27-rc1 for NetMos Technology PCI 9835 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11308] tbench regression on each kernel release from 2.6.22 -> 2.6.28 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11407] suspend: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11380] lockdep warning: cpu_add_remove_lock at:cpu_maps_update_begin+0x14/0x16 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11404] BUG: in 2.6.23-rc3-git7 in do_cciss_intr Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 23:24 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-10-25 23:24 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11505] oltp ~10% regression with 2.6.27-rc5 on stoakley machine Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11476] failure to associate after resume from suspend to ram Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11550] pnp: Huge number of "io resource overlap" messages Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-26 16:43 ` Frans Pop
2008-10-26 16:43 ` Frans Pop
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-26 7:11 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-10-26 7:11 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-10-26 11:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-26 11:03 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <200810261203.43348.rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-26 11:20 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-10-26 11:20 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11512] sort-of regression due to "kconfig: speed up all*config + randconfig" Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11664] acpi errors and random freeze on sony vaio sr Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11669] when CPU hotplugging is disabled, nr_cpu_ids does not get set properly during boot Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-26 22:00 ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-10-26 22:00 ` Chuck Ebbert
[not found] ` <20081026180052.414c7d66-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-26 22:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-26 22:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11569] Panic stop CPUs regression Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11608] 2.6.27-rc6 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11699] 2.6.27-rc-7: BUG: scheduling while atomic, c1e_idle+0x98/0xe0 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11698] 2.6.27-rc7, freezes with > 1 s2ram cycle Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11721] after upgrade to 2.6.27 i cannot navigate Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-26 5:02 ` David Miller
2008-10-26 5:02 ` David Miller
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11820] 2.6.27: 0 MHz CPU and wrong system time on AMD Geode system Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11830] disk statistics issue in 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11829] Kernel 2.6.26.5 -> 2.6.27.2 [USB REGRESSION] (USB -> D_STATE) Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11831] NULL pointer derefence since 2.6.27 in (e)poll Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11843] usb hdd problems with 2.6.27.2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11832] 2.6.27: "irq 18: nobody cared" on Toshiba Satellite A100 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` [Bug #11836] Scheduler on C2D CPU and latest 2.6.27 kernel Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-25 21:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <gLTYxg3cC1.A.Z_F.-K6AJB@chimera>
2008-10-25 23:55 ` [Bug #11504] reiserfs ????BUG in 2.6.27-rc5 Randy Dunlap
2008-10-25 23:55 ` Randy Dunlap
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-07 20:39 2.6.28-rc8-git5: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-07 20:41 ` [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-07 20:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-03 22:38 2.6.28-rc7-git2: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-03 22:40 ` [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-03 22:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-04 16:36 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-04 16:36 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-22 20:57 2.6.28-rc6-git1: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-22 20:59 ` [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-22 20:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-23 8:06 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-23 8:06 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-16 17:38 2.6.28-rc5: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-16 17:40 ` [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-16 17:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-09 19:40 2.6.28-rc3-git6: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-09 19:43 ` [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-09 19:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-10 16:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-10 16:18 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-02 16:47 2.6.28-rc2-git7: Reported regressions 2.6.26 -> 2.6.27 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:49 ` [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-02 16:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-11-03 7:22 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-03 7:22 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-10-04 17:28 2.6.27-rc8-git7: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-04 17:32 ` [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-04 17:32 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-10-04 19:44 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-10-04 19:44 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-27 15:54 2.6.27-rc7-git5: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-27 15:56 ` =?utf-8?q?[Bug=20#11543]=20kernel=20panic:=20softlockup=20in=20tick_periodic()=20????= Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-27 18:50 ` [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick periodic() Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-27 18:50 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-27 19:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-27 19:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:52 2.6.27-rc6-git6: Reported regressions from 2.6.26 Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` [Bug #11543] kernel panic: softlockup in tick_periodic() ??? Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-21 18:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-22 6:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-22 6:01 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-09-23 10:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-09-23 10:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0809231244190.3247-dbfLifZv8x0yMciVaGeJ0d53zsg1cpMQ@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-23 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-09-23 13:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.