From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@drzeus.cx>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3 RFC] MMC SPI support for OpenFirmware platforms
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:55:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081030195546.GA30645@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
Hi all,
Here are the bindings, again. Still RFC.
This patch series depends on:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/16/250
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/24/416
+ of_gpio_flags enum (Trent Piepho will post an updated patch soon,
I believe).
Pierre, the approach is somewhat similar to this one:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/26/135
Posted few months ago.
I know you don't like it, but I ask you to reconsider it. The
I2C and SPI cases are similar, and recently we tried to write
bindings for some I2C GPIO controllers.
There we've learned that we:
1. Don't like the bus notifiers approach b/c we can't place the OF
code into the module.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/21/425
Hacks are possible, but they're are ugly.
2. Don't want to write new drivers to solely handle the platform
data:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/28/257
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/28/268
And personally I don't want to do refactoring for every driver that
we'd want to use with the OpenFirmware...
If I understood correctly, for GPIO controllers David agreed that
we can live with the platform data accessors, at least for now:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/23/24
And when/if we'll find something better I'll be the first who
will offer help to convert the bindings code to this "something
better".
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
Pierre Ossman <drzeus-mmc@drzeus.cx>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3 RFC] MMC SPI support for OpenFirmware platforms
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 22:55:46 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081030195546.GA30645@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
Hi all,
Here are the bindings, again. Still RFC.
This patch series depends on:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/16/250
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/24/416
+ of_gpio_flags enum (Trent Piepho will post an updated patch soon,
I believe).
Pierre, the approach is somewhat similar to this one:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/26/135
Posted few months ago.
I know you don't like it, but I ask you to reconsider it. The
I2C and SPI cases are similar, and recently we tried to write
bindings for some I2C GPIO controllers.
There we've learned that we:
1. Don't like the bus notifiers approach b/c we can't place the OF
code into the module.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/21/425
Hacks are possible, but they're are ugly.
2. Don't want to write new drivers to solely handle the platform
data:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/28/257
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/28/268
And personally I don't want to do refactoring for every driver that
we'd want to use with the OpenFirmware...
If I understood correctly, for GPIO controllers David agreed that
we can live with the platform data accessors, at least for now:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/23/24
And when/if we'll find something better I'll be the first who
will offer help to convert the bindings code to this "something
better".
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next reply other threads:[~2008-10-30 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-30 19:55 Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2008-10-30 19:55 ` [PATCH 0/3 RFC] MMC SPI support for OpenFirmware platforms Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-30 19:56 ` [PATCH 1/3] powerpc: Add mmc-spi-slot bindings Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-30 19:56 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-30 20:37 ` Grant Likely
2008-10-30 20:37 ` Grant Likely
2008-10-30 23:02 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-30 23:02 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-30 23:24 ` David Gibson
2008-10-30 23:24 ` David Gibson
2008-10-30 23:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-30 23:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-30 19:56 ` [PATCH 2/3] mmc: Add mmc_vddrange_to_ocrmask() helper function Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-30 19:56 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-11-08 20:55 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-11-08 20:55 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-11-26 19:54 ` [PATCH v2] " Anton Vorontsov
2008-11-26 19:54 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-11-30 20:06 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-11-30 20:06 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-12-01 11:53 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-01 11:53 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-12-14 17:28 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-12-14 17:28 ` Pierre Ossman
2008-10-30 19:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] mmc_spi: Add support for OpenFirmware bindings Anton Vorontsov
2008-10-30 19:56 ` Anton Vorontsov
2008-11-08 20:50 ` [PATCH 0/3 RFC] MMC SPI support for OpenFirmware platforms Pierre Ossman
2008-11-08 20:50 ` Pierre Ossman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081030195546.GA30645@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=drzeus-mmc@drzeus.cx \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.