From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: "Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"jens.axboe@oracle.com" <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com" <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>,
"nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au" <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] generic-ipi: fix the smp_mb() placement
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:23:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081030202322.GM30573@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081030185322.GE17822@elte.hu>
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:53:22AM -0700, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Subject: generic-ipi: fix the smp_mb() placement
> >
> > smp_mb() is needed (to make the memory operations visible globally)
> > before sending the ipi on the sender and the receiver (on Alpha
> > atleast) needs smp_read_barrier_depends() in the handler before
> > reading the call_single_queue list in a lock-free fashion.
> >
> > On x86, x2apic mode register accesses for sending IPI's don't have
> > serializing semantics. So the need for smp_mb() before sending the
> > IPI becomes more critical in x2apic mode.
> >
> > Remove the unnecessary smp_mb() in csd_flag_wait(), as the presence
> > of that smp_mb() doesn't mean anything on the sender, when the ipi
> > receiver is not doing any thing special (like memory fence) after
> > clearing the CSD_FLAG_WAIT.
>
> nice! Did you see an actual lockup due to this?
We didn't see the lockup in our tests but Xen folks reported similar failures
with their smp call function code.
> Seems like a v2.6.28 fix to me in any case.
Yes.
thanks,
suresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-30 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-29 22:42 [patch] generic-ipi: fix the smp_mb() placement Suresh Siddha
2008-10-30 7:20 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-30 16:30 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-10-30 17:25 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-30 18:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-30 20:23 ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2008-10-31 5:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-31 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-31 11:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-31 16:53 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-10-31 20:30 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-11-03 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-03 23:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-11-04 9:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-04 22:25 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-11-05 9:20 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081030202322.GM30573@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.