From: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>,
"jens.axboe@oracle.com" <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au" <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
"torvalds@linux-foundation.org" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] generic-ipi: fix the smp_mb() placement
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 09:53:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081031165334.GA10468@linux-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <490AE820.1010301@goop.org>
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 04:12:32AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Suresh Siddha wrote:
> >>
> >>> We didn't see the lockup in our tests but Xen folks reported similar failures
> >>> with their smp call function code.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> ...really? I don't remember anything like that, but perhaps I'm
> >> forgetting something. In Xen the IPI is sent with a hypercall,
> >> which is definitely a solid enough barrier for these purposes.
> >>
> >
> > i think Suresh might be referring to some of the fragilities Xen had
> > with generic-ipi. But those AFAICT were due to the on-stack lifetime
> > bug that Nick fixed via the kmalloc? v2.6.26-ish issue.
>
> Right, that's all I could think of.
No. I am referring to Xen hypervisor code fix recently done by the Xen
team in the Intel.
http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg?rev/50170dc8649c
thanks,
suresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-31 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-29 22:42 [patch] generic-ipi: fix the smp_mb() placement Suresh Siddha
2008-10-30 7:20 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-30 16:30 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-10-30 17:25 ` Jens Axboe
2008-10-30 18:53 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-30 20:23 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-10-31 5:10 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-31 9:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-10-31 11:12 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-10-31 16:53 ` Suresh Siddha [this message]
2008-10-31 20:30 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-11-03 10:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-03 23:48 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-11-04 9:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-04 22:25 ` Suresh Siddha
2008-11-05 9:20 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081031165334.GA10468@linux-os.sc.intel.com \
--to=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.