From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@fastmail.fm>,
Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@mailshack.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
lguest@ozlabs.org, jeremy@xensource.com,
Steven Rostedt <srostedt@redhat.com>,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 17:58:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081104165811.GA1664@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081104164717.GD21470@localhost>
* Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
> [Alexander van Heukelum - Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 05:23:09PM +0100]
> ...
> |
> | I did some timings using the little program below (32-bit only), doing
> | 1024 times the same sequence. TEST1 is just pushing a constant onto
> | the stack; TEST2 is pushing the cs register; TEST3 is the sequence
> | from the patch to extract the vector number from the cs register.
> |
> | Opteron (cycles): 1024 / 1157 / 3527
> | Xeon E5345 (cycles): 1092 / 1085 / 6622
> | Athlon XP (cycles): 1028 / 1166 / 5192
>
> Xeon is defenitely out of luck :-)
it's still OK - i.e. no outrageous showstopper overhead anywhere in
that instruction sequence. The total round-trip overhead is what will
matter most.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-04 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-04 12:28 [PATCH RFC/RFB] x86_64, i386: interrupt dispatch changes Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-04 12:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-04 13:29 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-04 14:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-04 16:23 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-04 16:47 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-04 16:58 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-11-04 17:13 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-04 17:29 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-06 9:19 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-04 20:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-11-04 20:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-04 20:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-11-04 15:07 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-04 15:47 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-04 16:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-04 16:45 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-04 16:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-04 16:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-04 16:58 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-04 17:39 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-04 17:05 ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-04 18:06 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-04 18:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-04 18:44 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-04 19:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-04 19:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-04 20:06 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-11-04 20:30 ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-04 20:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-04 20:46 ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-04 20:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-04 21:06 ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-05 0:42 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-11-05 0:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-06 9:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-06 9:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-06 9:30 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-05 10:26 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-14 1:11 ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-14 1:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-14 2:12 ` Nick Piggin
2008-11-04 21:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-04 21:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-04 21:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-05 17:53 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-05 18:04 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-05 18:14 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-11-05 18:20 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-05 18:26 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
[not found] ` <1226243805.27361.1283784629@webmail.messagingengine.com>
2008-11-10 1:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-26 21:35 ` [Lguest] " Avi Kivity
2008-11-26 21:50 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-27 0:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-27 10:13 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-27 10:56 ` Andi Kleen
2008-11-27 10:59 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-28 20:48 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-29 15:45 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-29 18:21 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-29 18:22 ` Avi Kivity
2008-11-29 19:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-01 4:32 ` Rusty Russell
2008-12-01 8:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-01 9:24 ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-01 10:32 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
2008-12-01 10:41 ` Avi Kivity
2008-12-01 10:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-10 8:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-10 12:44 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-10 13:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-10 21:35 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-10 22:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-11 5:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-13 22:23 ` Matt Mackall
2008-11-14 1:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-14 2:29 ` Matt Mackall
2008-11-14 3:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-11 9:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-11-10 15:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-10 21:44 ` Alexander van Heukelum
2008-11-10 23:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-11-05 18:15 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081104165811.GA1664@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=gorcunov@gmail.com \
--cc=heukelum@fastmail.fm \
--cc=heukelum@mailshack.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=jeremy@xensource.com \
--cc=lguest@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.