All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@googlemail.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
	Arjan van de Veen <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	perfctr-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] [Announcement] Performance Counters for Linux
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 19:30:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081204193011.37d2b3cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081204225345.654705757@linutronix.de>

On Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:44:39 -0000 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:

> Performance counters are special hardware registers available on most modern
> CPUs. These register count the number of certain types of hw events: such
> as instructions executed, cachemisses suffered, or branches mis-predicted,
> without slowing down the kernel or applications. These registers can also
> trigger interrupts when a threshold number of events have passed - and can
> thus be used to profile the code that runs on that CPU.
> 
> We'd like to announce a brand new implementation of performance counter
> support for Linux. It is a very simple and extensible design that has the
> potential to implement the full range of features we would expect from such
> a subsystem.
> 
> The Linux Performance Counter subsystem (implemented via the patches
> posted in this announcement) provides an abstraction of performance counter
> hardware capabilities. It provides per task and per CPU counters, and it
> provides event capabilities on top of those.
> 
> The code is far from complete - but the basic approach is already there
> and stable.
> 
> The biggest missing detail is lowlevel support for non-Intel CPUs and
> older Intel CPUs - right now the code is implemented for Intel Core2
> (and later) Intel CPUs that have the PERFMON CPU feature. (see below
> a wider list of missing/upcoming features)
> 
> We are aware of the perfmon3 patchset that has been submitted to lkml
> recently. Our patchset tries to achieve a similar end result, with
> a fundamentally different (and we believe, superior :-) design:

There's also the perfctr patchset, which has been available for a long
time.

I believe that established users of this sort of capability often
access it via the supposed-to-be-cross-platform PAPI interface/library.

Please cc perfctr-devel@lists.sourceforge.net on emails related to this
work.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-12-05  3:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-04 23:44 [patch 0/3] [Announcement] Performance Counters for Linux Thomas Gleixner
2008-12-04 23:44 ` [patch 1/3] performance counters: core code Thomas Gleixner
2008-12-05 10:55   ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05 11:20     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-04 23:44 ` [patch 2/3] performance counters: documentation Thomas Gleixner
2008-12-05  0:33   ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05  0:37     ` David Miller
2008-12-05  2:50       ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-12-05  3:26         ` David Miller
2008-12-05  2:33     ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-04 23:45 ` [patch 3/3] performance counters: x86 support Thomas Gleixner
2008-12-05  0:22 ` [patch 0/3] [Announcement] Performance Counters for Linux Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05  6:31   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05  7:02     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-12-05  7:52       ` David Miller
2008-12-05  7:03     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05  7:16       ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-05  7:57         ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05  8:03           ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-05  8:07             ` David Miller
2008-12-05  8:11               ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05  8:17                 ` David Miller
2008-12-05  8:24                   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05  8:27                     ` David Miller
2008-12-05  8:42                       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05  8:49                         ` David Miller
2008-12-05 12:13                           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05 12:39                         ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-05 20:08                           ` David Miller
2008-12-10  3:48                             ` Paul Mundt
2008-12-10  4:42                               ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-10  8:43                               ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-12-10 10:28                               ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-10 10:28                                 ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-10 10:23                                 ` Paul Mundt
2008-12-10 11:03                                   ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-10 11:03                                     ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-05 15:00               ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-12-05  9:16             ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05  7:57       ` David Miller
2008-12-05  8:18         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05  8:20           ` David Miller
2008-12-05  7:54     ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05  8:08       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05  8:15         ` David Miller
2008-12-05 13:25           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05  9:10         ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05 12:07           ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-06  0:05             ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-06  1:23               ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-12-06 12:34               ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-07  5:15                 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-08  7:18                   ` stephane eranian
2008-12-08 11:11                     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-08 11:58                       ` David Miller
2008-12-09  0:21                       ` stephane eranian
2008-12-05  0:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-12-05  0:43   ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05  1:12 ` David Miller
2008-12-05  6:10   ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05  7:50     ` David Miller
2008-12-05  9:34     ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05 10:41       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05 10:05     ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05  3:30 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-12-06  2:36 ` stephane eranian
2008-12-08  2:12   ` [perfmon2] [patch 0/3] [Announcement] Performance Counters forLinux Dan Terpstra
2008-12-08  2:12     ` Dan Terpstra
2008-12-10 16:27   ` [patch 0/3] [Announcement] Performance Counters for Linux Rob Fowler
2008-12-10 16:27     ` [perfmon2] " Rob Fowler
2008-12-10 17:11     ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-10 17:11       ` Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-05 21:24 Corey Ashford

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20081204193011.37d2b3cd.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eranian@googlemail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=perfctr-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.