From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, paulus@samba.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, eranian@googlemail.com,
dada1@cosmosbay.com, robert.richter@amd.com, arjan@infradead.org,
hpa@zytor.com, rostedt@goodmis.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] [Announcement] Performance Counters for Linux
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 09:11:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20081205081137.GB2030@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081205.000716.40104924.davem@davemloft.net>
* David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
> Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 09:03:36 +0100
>
> > On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 18:57 +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > > Peter Zijlstra writes:
> > >
> > > > So, while most people would not consider two consecutive read() ops to
> > > > be close or near the same time, due to preemption and such, that is
> > > > taken away by the fact that the counters are task local time based - so
> > > > preemption doesn't affect thing. Right?
> > >
> > > I'm sorry, I don't follow the argument here. What do you mean by
> > > "task local time based"?
> >
> > time only flows when the task is running.
>
> These things aren't measuring time, or even just cycles, they are
> measuring things like L2 cache misses, cpu cycles, and other similar
> kinds of events.
>
> So these counters are going to measure all of the damn crap assosciated
> with doing the read() call as well as the real work the task does.
that's wrong, look at the example we posted - see it pasted below.
When monitoring another task it does _not_ count the read() done in the
monitoring task, it does _not_ include it in the event count. It is a
fundamental property of our code to be as unintrusive as possible. It
only measures the work done by that task.
( You _can_ measure your own overhead of course too, if you want to. It's
a natural special-case of our performance counter abstraction. )
Ingo
---
/*
* Performance counters monitoring test case
*/
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <getopt.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <errno.h>
#define __user
#include "sys.h"
static int count = 10000;
static int eventid;
static int tid;
static char *debuginfo;
static void display_help(void)
{
printf("monitor\n");
printf("Usage:\n"
"monitor options threadid\n\n"
"-e EID --eventid=EID eventid\n"
"-c CNT --count=CNT event count on which IP is sampled\n"
"-d FILE --debug=FILE path to binary file with debug info\n");
exit(0);
}
static void process_options (int argc, char *argv[])
{
int error = 0;
for (;;) {
int option_index = 0;
/** Options for getopt */
static struct option long_options[] = {
{"count", required_argument, NULL, 'c'},
{"debug", required_argument, NULL, 'd'},
{"eventid", required_argument, NULL, 'e'},
{"help", no_argument, NULL, 'h'},
{NULL, 0, NULL, 0}
};
int c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "c:d:e:",
long_options, &option_index);
if (c == -1)
break;
switch (c) {
case 'c': count = atoi(optarg); break;
case 'd': debuginfo = strdup(optarg); break;
case 'e': eventid = atoi(optarg); break;
default: error = 1; break;
}
}
if (error || optind == argc)
display_help ();
tid = atoi(argv[optind]);
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
char str[256];
uint64_t ip;
ssize_t res;
int fd;
process_options(argc, argv);
fd = perf_counter_open(eventid, count, 1, tid, -1);
if (fd < 0) {
perror("Create counter");
exit(-1);
}
while (1) {
res = read(fd, (char *) &ip, sizeof(ip));
if (res != sizeof(ip)) {
perror("Read counter");
break;
}
if (!debuginfo) {
printf("IP: 0x%016llx\n", (unsigned long long)ip);
} else {
sprintf(str, "addr2line -e %s 0x%llx\n", debuginfo,
(unsigned long long)ip);
system(str);
}
}
close(fd);
exit(0);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-05 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-04 23:44 [patch 0/3] [Announcement] Performance Counters for Linux Thomas Gleixner
2008-12-04 23:44 ` [patch 1/3] performance counters: core code Thomas Gleixner
2008-12-05 10:55 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05 11:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-04 23:44 ` [patch 2/3] performance counters: documentation Thomas Gleixner
2008-12-05 0:33 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05 0:37 ` David Miller
2008-12-05 2:50 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-12-05 3:26 ` David Miller
2008-12-05 2:33 ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-04 23:45 ` [patch 3/3] performance counters: x86 support Thomas Gleixner
2008-12-05 0:22 ` [patch 0/3] [Announcement] Performance Counters for Linux Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05 6:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05 7:02 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-12-05 7:52 ` David Miller
2008-12-05 7:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05 7:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-05 7:57 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05 8:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-05 8:07 ` David Miller
2008-12-05 8:11 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2008-12-05 8:17 ` David Miller
2008-12-05 8:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05 8:27 ` David Miller
2008-12-05 8:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05 8:49 ` David Miller
2008-12-05 12:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05 12:39 ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-05 20:08 ` David Miller
2008-12-10 3:48 ` Paul Mundt
2008-12-10 4:42 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-10 8:43 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-12-10 10:28 ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-10 10:28 ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-10 10:23 ` Paul Mundt
2008-12-10 11:03 ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-10 11:03 ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-05 15:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-12-05 9:16 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05 7:57 ` David Miller
2008-12-05 8:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05 8:20 ` David Miller
2008-12-05 7:54 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05 8:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05 8:15 ` David Miller
2008-12-05 13:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05 9:10 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05 12:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-06 0:05 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-06 1:23 ` Mikael Pettersson
2008-12-06 12:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2008-12-07 5:15 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-08 7:18 ` stephane eranian
2008-12-08 11:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-08 11:58 ` David Miller
2008-12-09 0:21 ` stephane eranian
2008-12-05 0:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-12-05 0:43 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05 1:12 ` David Miller
2008-12-05 6:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05 7:50 ` David Miller
2008-12-05 9:34 ` Paul Mackerras
2008-12-05 10:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05 10:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-12-05 3:30 ` Andrew Morton
2008-12-06 2:36 ` stephane eranian
2008-12-08 2:12 ` [perfmon2] [patch 0/3] [Announcement] Performance Counters forLinux Dan Terpstra
2008-12-08 2:12 ` Dan Terpstra
2008-12-10 16:27 ` [patch 0/3] [Announcement] Performance Counters for Linux Rob Fowler
2008-12-10 16:27 ` [perfmon2] " Rob Fowler
2008-12-10 17:11 ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-10 17:11 ` Andi Kleen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-12-05 21:24 Corey Ashford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20081205081137.GB2030@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eranian@googlemail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.