Re: Confusion in usr/include/asm-generic/fcntl.h

[Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>]

On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:13:16PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Could we add a new symbol for this?
> > We know we are going to use this in several places so a simpler var=
iant
> > would be more readable.
> >=20
> > Something like:
> >=20
> > #ifdef __64BIT
> > ...
> > #endif
> >=20
> > When we define __64BIT we would use the =A0__BITS_PER_LONG =3D=3D 6=
4 check.
>=20
> I would prefer using the __BITS_PER_LONG =3D=3D 64 check directly, be=
cause
> it gives you a warning when __BITS_PER_LONG is undefined, whereas the
> #ifdef check gets easily fooled by include order problems. Note that
> this is not a problem in the kernel for CONFIG_* symbols which are
> always defined before the first #include.

It gives the warning only if you add -Wundef which IIRC is not default
with -Wall. And using the "__BITS_PER_LONG =3D=3D 64" the risk of gitti=
ng
the expression wrong is much higher than the simpler variant where
you only write:

    __64BIT

But I have no strong feelings for it.

	Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc"=
 in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html