Re: checksums situation

[Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>]

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 09:49:04AM +0100, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 of February 2009 07:46:39 Tom Rini wrote:
> 
> > And, is anyone doing more then 'cat tmp/checksums.ini >>
> > openembedded/conf/checksums.ini && python the-sorter' ?  And by more
> > I mean check for an upstream .md5 or similar, to make sure this is
> > really right?
> 
> commit 67aa127f4b4cb2e4083a02adfddd7d82534751a3
> Author: Marcin Juszkiewicz <hrw@openembedded.org>
> Date:   Thu Nov 13 18:07:47 2008 +0100
> 
>     checksums.ini: add 1212 entries from test fetch build
> 
>     This is result of simple shell script and few hours of fetching:
>     for recipe in $OEROOT/packages/*/*.bb
>     do
>       bitbake -b $recipe -cfetch
>     done
> 
> This was done with not so empty DL_DIR but most of entries were fresh 
> fetched. If someone has machine with good network connection (I no 
> longer have access to machine where I was running that test) then feel 
> free to call that loop with empty DL_DIR.

IOW, no.  We're just using checksums.ini as a "at one point, it was ..."
and not actually making sure that it's the right checksum.

-- 
Tom Rini