Re: checksums situation

[Otavio Salvador <otavio@debian.org>]

Ihar Hrachyshka <ihar.hrachyshka@gmail.com> writes:

> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Otavio Salvador <otavio@debian.org> wrote:
>> Marcin Juszkiewicz <openembedded@haerwu.biz> writes:
>>
>> <...>
>>> This solution also has one nasty part - now we can keep SRC_URI for
>>> multiple versions in common file, but if we switch to storing it in
>>> SRC_URI we will have to change that.
>>>
>>> Other solution proposed on IRC was to keep checksums in extra file in
>>> each directory of packages/ subdirectory. I think that it is not best
>>> but sounds better then one file.
>>>
>>> What do you think? Which way we should go? Do you have other ideas?
>> <...>
>>
>> What about having a checksums for _each_ recipe?
>>
>> foo_1.0.bb
>> foo_1.0.md5sum
>
> This will waste directories and will make tree navigation harder.

Well; so let's just create a md5sums directory at OE topdir and add the
dirs and files there.

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."