Re: checksums situation

[Otavio Salvador <otavio@debian.org>]

Marcin Juszkiewicz <openembedded@haerwu.biz> writes:

<...>
> This solution also has one nasty part - now we can keep SRC_URI for 
> multiple versions in common file, but if we switch to storing it in 
> SRC_URI we will have to change that.
>
> Other solution proposed on IRC was to keep checksums in extra file in 
> each directory of packages/ subdirectory. I think that it is not best 
> but sounds better then one file.
>
> What do you think? Which way we should go? Do you have other ideas?
<...>

What about having a checksums for _each_ recipe?

foo_1.0.bb
foo_1.0.md5sum

This could have the valid one; this also avoid the sorting problem and
like.

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: otavio@debian.org      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://otavio.ossystems.com.br
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft sells you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."