Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] memcg softlimit (Another one) v4

[Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-03-12 13:39:49]:

> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 09:16:47 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-03-12 09:52:47]:
> > I've tested so far by
> > 
> > Creating two cgroups and then 
> > 
> > a. Assigning limits of 1G and 2G and run memory allocation and touch
> > test
> softlimit ?
>

Yes
 
> > b. Same as (a) with 1G and 1G
> > c. Same as (a) with 0 and 1G
> > d. Same as (a) with 0 and 0
> > 
> > More comments in induvidual patches.
> > 
> Then,
>   1. what's the number of active threads ?

One for each process in the two groups

>   2. what's the number of cpus ?

4

>   3. what's the numa configuration, if numa ?

Fake NUMA with nodes = 4, I have DMA, DMA32 and NORMAL split across
nodes.

>   4. what's the zone configuration ?
>   5. what's arch ?
>   6. what's amount of total memory ?

I have 4GB on x86-64 system (Quad Core)

>   7. Do you find difference in behavior with and without softlimit ?

Very much so.. I see the resources being shared as defined by soft
limits.

>   8. Do you tested *this* version ?
> 

Not yet.. you just posted it. I am testing my v5, which I'll post
soon. I am seeing very good results with v5. I'll test yours later
today.

> Thanks,
> -Kame

-- 
	Balbir