From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
"kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] memcg softlimit (Another one) v4
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:56:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090312082646.GA5828@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090312143212.50818cd5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-03-12 14:32:12]:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:34:23 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Not yet.. you just posted it. I am testing my v5, which I'll post
> > soon. I am seeing very good results with v5. I'll test yours later
> > today.
> >
>
> If "hooks" to usual path doesn't exist and there are no global locks,
> I don't have much concern with your version.
Good to know. I think it is always good to have competing patches and
then collaborating and getting the best in.
> But 'sorting' seems to be overkill to me.
>
Sorting is very useful, specially if you have many cgroups. Without
sorting, how do we select what group to select first.
> I'm sorry if my responce to your patch is delayed. I may not be in office.
>
No problem
--
Balbir
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp>,
"kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com" <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] memcg softlimit (Another one) v4
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:56:46 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090312082646.GA5828@balbir.in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090312143212.50818cd5.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
* KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-03-12 14:32:12]:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 10:34:23 +0530
> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Not yet.. you just posted it. I am testing my v5, which I'll post
> > soon. I am seeing very good results with v5. I'll test yours later
> > today.
> >
>
> If "hooks" to usual path doesn't exist and there are no global locks,
> I don't have much concern with your version.
Good to know. I think it is always good to have competing patches and
then collaborating and getting the best in.
> But 'sorting' seems to be overkill to me.
>
Sorting is very useful, specially if you have many cgroups. Without
sorting, how do we select what group to select first.
> I'm sorry if my responce to your patch is delayed. I may not be in office.
>
No problem
--
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-12 8:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-12 0:52 [RFC][PATCH 0/5] memcg softlimit (Another one) v4 KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 0:52 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 0:55 ` [BUGFIX][PATCH 1/5] memcg use correct scan number at reclaim KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 0:55 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 3:49 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 3:49 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 3:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 3:51 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 4:00 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 4:00 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 4:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 4:05 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 4:14 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 4:14 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 4:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 4:17 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 7:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-12 7:45 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-12 9:45 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 9:45 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 11:23 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-12 11:23 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-03-12 0:56 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/5] add softlimit to res_counter KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 0:56 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 3:54 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 3:54 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 3:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 3:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 4:10 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 4:10 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 4:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 4:14 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 0:57 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/5] memcg per zone softlimit scheduler core KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 0:57 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 0:58 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/5] memcg softlimit_priority KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 0:58 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 1:00 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/5] memcg softlimit hooks to kswapd KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 1:00 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 3:58 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 3:58 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 4:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 4:02 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 4:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 4:59 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 1:01 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/5] softlimit document KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 1:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 1:54 ` Li Zefan
2009-03-12 1:54 ` Li Zefan
2009-03-12 2:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 2:01 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 3:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/5] memcg softlimit (Another one) v4 Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 3:46 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 4:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 4:39 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 5:04 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 5:04 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 5:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 5:32 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 8:26 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2009-03-12 8:26 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 8:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 8:45 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-12 9:53 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-12 9:53 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-14 18:52 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-14 18:52 ` Balbir Singh
2009-03-16 0:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2009-03-16 0:10 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090312082646.GA5828@balbir.in.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.