All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acquire mmap semaphore in pagemap_read.
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:46:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090312164634.6f2027ac@skybase> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49B92D2B.2090100@ens-lyon.org>

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:41:31 +0100
Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org> wrote:

> > Which would be really ugly. I still have not grasped why this will
> > introduce a deadlock though. The worst the put_user can do is to cause
> > a page fault, no? I do not see where the fault handler acquires the
> > mmap_sem as writer. It takes the mmap_sem as reader and two readers
> > should be fine.
> 
> Somebody else can acquire for write in the meantime, for instance
> another thread doing mprotect. This writer is blocked by the first
> reader, and the second reader is blocked by the writer. So both
> tasks are blocked.

I see, fair r/w locks. So nested down_read is a no-no.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
To: Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com>,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acquire mmap semaphore in pagemap_read.
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:46:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090312164634.6f2027ac@skybase> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49B92D2B.2090100@ens-lyon.org>

On Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:41:31 +0100
Brice Goglin <Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org> wrote:

> > Which would be really ugly. I still have not grasped why this will
> > introduce a deadlock though. The worst the put_user can do is to cause
> > a page fault, no? I do not see where the fault handler acquires the
> > mmap_sem as writer. It takes the mmap_sem as reader and two readers
> > should be fine.
> 
> Somebody else can acquire for write in the meantime, for instance
> another thread doing mprotect. This writer is blocked by the first
> reader, and the second reader is blocked by the writer. So both
> tasks are blocked.

I see, fair r/w locks. So nested down_read is a no-no.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-12 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-12 10:33 [PATCH] acquire mmap semaphore in pagemap_read Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-12 10:33 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-12 11:45 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-03-12 11:45   ` Alexey Dobriyan
2009-03-12 11:54   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-12 11:54     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-12 15:23     ` Matt Mackall
2009-03-12 15:23       ` Matt Mackall
2009-03-12 15:27       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-12 15:27         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-12 15:41         ` Brice Goglin
2009-03-12 15:41           ` Brice Goglin
2009-03-12 15:46           ` Martin Schwidefsky [this message]
2009-03-12 15:46             ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-12 15:54       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-12 15:54         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-17 12:04         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-17 12:04           ` Martin Schwidefsky
2009-03-17 16:21           ` Matt Mackall
2009-03-17 16:21             ` Matt Mackall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090312164634.6f2027ac@skybase \
    --to=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=Brice.Goglin@ens-lyon.org \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=gerald.schaefer@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.