From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] [PATCH][GIT PULL] remove unnecessary (un)likelys
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:19:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090325071932.GA25833@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090325051920.406564281@goodmis.org>
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> Ingo,
>
> I guess this can go through you. This is a start of clean ups to
> get rid of (un)likelys that are at least 50% incorrect. This
> series has some that are 100% incorrect.
Nice!
I'll wait for the acks from affected (and Cc:-ed) maintainers though
- and they might decide to carry the patches in their trees straight
away (or disagree with the change) so a rebase is in the cards as
well.
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-25 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-25 5:19 [PATCH 0/5] [PATCH][GIT PULL] remove unnecessary (un)likelys Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH 1/5] ptrace: remove incorrect unlikelys Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 7:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-25 13:31 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-03-25 13:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 9:28 ` Roland McGrath
2009-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: remove unlikly NULL from kfree Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 7:34 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-03-25 7:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-25 8:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-03-25 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-25 8:02 ` Hua Zhong
2009-03-25 8:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-03-25 13:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-03-25 14:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 14:59 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-03-25 15:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 15:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 16:14 ` Matt Mackall
2009-03-25 16:34 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 20:26 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-03-25 21:09 ` Matt Mackall
2009-03-25 21:01 ` Matt Mackall
2009-03-25 21:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 15:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-26 16:10 ` Al Viro
2009-03-26 16:15 ` Andrew Morton
2009-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH 3/5] sched: remove unlikely in pre_schedule_rt Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 5:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched: remove unlikelys from sched_move_task Steven Rostedt
2009-03-25 5:19 ` [PATCH 5/5] mm: remove unlikelys for unlock in rmap.c Steven Rostedt
2009-04-24 11:12 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-04-24 12:15 ` Lee Schermerhorn
2009-03-25 7:19 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2009-03-25 7:25 ` [PATCH 0/5] [PATCH][GIT PULL] remove unnecessary (un)likelys Ingo Molnar
2009-03-25 13:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-27 16:30 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090325071932.GA25833@elte.hu \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=roland@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.