Re: [patch 0/6] Guest page hinting version 7.

[Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>]

On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:05:28 +1030
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:

> On Saturday 28 March 2009 01:39:05 Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > Greetings,
> > the circus is back in town -- another version of the guest page hinting
> > patches. The patches differ from version 6 only in the kernel version,
> > they apply against 2.6.29. My short sniff test showed that the code
> > is still working as expected.
> > 
> > To recap (you can skip this if you read the boiler plate of the last
> > version of the patches):
> > The main benefit for guest page hinting vs. the ballooner is that there
> > is no need for a monitor that keeps track of the memory usage of all the
> > guests, a complex algorithm that calculates the working set sizes and for
> > the calls into the guest kernel to control the size of the balloons.
> 
> I thought you weren't convinced of the concrete benefits over ballooning,
> or am I misremembering?

The performance test I have seen so far show that the benefits of
ballooning vs. guest page hinting are about the same. I am still
convinced that the guest page hinting is the way to go because you do
not need an external monitor. Calculating the working set size for a
guest is a challenge. With guest page hinting there is no need for a
working set size calculation.

-- 
blue skies,
   Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>