* [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k @ 2009-05-07 8:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2009-05-07 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1] (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k: * >= 2.6.27.22 * >= 2.6.28.10 * 2.6.29 If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29. If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285 devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still in RC series). As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3]. Luis [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* New kernel recommendations for ath9k @ 2009-05-07 8:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2009-05-07 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-wireless; +Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1] (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k: * >= 2.6.27.22 * >= 2.6.28.10 * 2.6.29 If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29. If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285 devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still in RC series). As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3]. Luis [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* New kernel recommendations for ath9k @ 2009-05-07 8:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2009-05-07 8:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-wireless; +Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1] (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k: * >= 2.6.27.22 * >= 2.6.28.10 * 2.6.29 If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29. If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285 devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still in RC series). As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3]. Luis [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k 2009-05-07 8:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez (?) @ 2009-05-07 10:02 ` Karl Hiramoto -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Karl Hiramoto @ 2009-05-07 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1] > (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to > let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k: > > * >= 2.6.27.22 > * >= 2.6.28.10 > * 2.6.29 > > If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29. > If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285 > devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to > start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still > in RC series). > > As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or > another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to > be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for > stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3]. > > Luis > > [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k > [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download > [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable > Thanks for the update. If i want to use multiple AP's with Ath9k it it still best to use wireless-testing? Is multiple AP support in 2.6.30-rc series net-next or wireless-next? Thanks. -- Karl ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k @ 2009-05-07 10:02 ` Karl Hiramoto 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Karl Hiramoto @ 2009-05-07 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Luis R. Rodriguez Cc: linux-wireless, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1] > (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to > let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k: > > * >= 2.6.27.22 > * >= 2.6.28.10 > * 2.6.29 > > If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29. > If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285 > devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to > start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still > in RC series). > > As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or > another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to > be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for > stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3]. > > Luis > > [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k > [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download > [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable > Thanks for the update. If i want to use multiple AP's with Ath9k it it still best to use wireless-testing? Is multiple AP support in 2.6.30-rc series net-next or wireless-next? Thanks. -- Karl ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k @ 2009-05-07 10:02 ` Karl Hiramoto 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Karl Hiramoto @ 2009-05-07 10:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Luis R. Rodriguez Cc: linux-wireless, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1] > (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to > let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k: > > * >= 2.6.27.22 > * >= 2.6.28.10 > * 2.6.29 > > If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29. > If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285 > devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to > start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still > in RC series). > > As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or > another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to > be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for > stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3]. > > Luis > > [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k > [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download > [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable > Thanks for the update. If i want to use multiple AP's with Ath9k it it still best to use wireless-testing? Is multiple AP support in 2.6.30-rc series net-next or wireless-next? Thanks. -- Karl ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k 2009-05-07 10:02 ` Karl Hiramoto (?) @ 2009-05-07 17:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2009-05-07 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org> wrote: > Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1] >> (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to >> let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k: >> >> ?* ?>= 2.6.27.22 >> ?* ?>= 2.6.28.10 >> ?* ?2.6.29 >> >> If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29. >> If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285 >> devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to >> start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still >> in RC series). >> >> As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or >> another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to >> be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for >> stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3]. >> >> ?Luis >> >> [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k >> [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download >> [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable >> > > Thanks for the update. ?If i want to use multiple AP's with Ath9k it it > still best to use wireless-testing? ?Is multiple AP support in 2.6.30-rc > series net-next or wireless-next? Yeah wireless-testing is best for that. I should also mention that if you want to use AP mode you want to be at least on 2.6.29 (your own kernel, not the compat-wireless one) if you care about Power Save buffering on the AP as otherwise even if you use a compat-wireless with code from > 2.6.29 those frames will be dropped. IIRC its due to the way we use skb->cb for this and there not being a clean way to backport this (so we just drop them). Luis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k @ 2009-05-07 17:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2009-05-07 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Karl Hiramoto Cc: linux-wireless, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gabor Juhos, Felix Fietkau On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org> wrote: > Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1] >> (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to >> let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k: >> >> * >= 2.6.27.22 >> * >= 2.6.28.10 >> * 2.6.29 >> >> If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29. >> If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285 >> devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to >> start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still >> in RC series). >> >> As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or >> another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to >> be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for >> stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3]. >> >> Luis >> >> [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k >> [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download >> [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable >> > > Thanks for the update. If i want to use multiple AP's with Ath9k it it > still best to use wireless-testing? Is multiple AP support in 2.6.30-rc > series net-next or wireless-next? Yeah wireless-testing is best for that. I should also mention that if you want to use AP mode you want to be at least on 2.6.29 (your own kernel, not the compat-wireless one) if you care about Power Save buffering on the AP as otherwise even if you use a compat-wireless with code from > 2.6.29 those frames will be dropped. IIRC its due to the way we use skb->cb for this and there not being a clean way to backport this (so we just drop them). Luis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k @ 2009-05-07 17:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2009-05-07 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Karl Hiramoto Cc: linux-wireless, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Gabor Juhos, Felix Fietkau On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org> wrote= : > Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1= ] >> (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to >> let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k: >> >> =C2=A0* =C2=A0>=3D 2.6.27.22 >> =C2=A0* =C2=A0>=3D 2.6.28.10 >> =C2=A0* =C2=A02.6.29 >> >> If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.2= 9. >> If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285 >> devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to >> start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (sti= ll >> in RC series). >> >> As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason o= r >> another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens t= o >> be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases f= or >> stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3]. >> >> =C2=A0Luis >> >> [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k >> [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download >> [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable >> > > Thanks for the update. =C2=A0If i want to use multiple AP's with Ath9= k it it > still best to use wireless-testing? =C2=A0Is multiple AP support in 2= =2E6.30-rc > series net-next or wireless-next? Yeah wireless-testing is best for that. I should also mention that if you want to use AP mode you want to be at least on 2.6.29 (your own kernel, not the compat-wireless one) if you care about Power Save buffering on the AP as otherwise even if you use a compat-wireless with code from > 2.6.29 those frames will be dropped. IIRC its due to the way we use skb->cb for this and there not being a clean way to backport this (so we just drop them). Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-wireles= s" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k 2009-05-07 17:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez (?) @ 2009-05-09 5:50 ` Jason Daly -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Jason Daly @ 2009-05-09 5:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel Thanks for the kernel info. How do you configure hostapd to work in N mode with ath9k? Currently the hw_mode parameter found in hostapd.conf does not accept anything greater than g. Thanks -JD Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org> wrote: >> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>> For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1] >>> (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to >>> let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k: >>> >>> * >= 2.6.27.22 >>> * >= 2.6.28.10 >>> * 2.6.29 >>> >>> If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29. >>> If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285 >>> devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to >>> start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still >>> in RC series). >>> >>> As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or >>> another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to >>> be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for >>> stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3]. >>> >>> Luis >>> >>> [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k >>> [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download >>> [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable >>> >> Thanks for the update. If i want to use multiple AP's with Ath9k it it >> still best to use wireless-testing? Is multiple AP support in 2.6.30-rc >> series net-next or wireless-next? > > Yeah wireless-testing is best for that. I should also mention that if > you want to use AP mode you want to be at least on 2.6.29 (your own > kernel, not the compat-wireless one) if you care about Power Save > buffering on the AP as otherwise even if you use a compat-wireless > with code from > 2.6.29 those frames will be dropped. IIRC its due to > the way we use skb->cb for this and there not being a clean way to > backport this (so we just drop them). > > Luis > _______________________________________________ > ath9k-devel mailing list > ath9k-devel at lists.ath9k.org > https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k @ 2009-05-09 5:50 ` Jason Daly 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Jason Daly @ 2009-05-09 5:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Luis R. Rodriguez Cc: Karl Hiramoto, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-wireless, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thanks for the kernel info. How do you configure hostapd to work in N mode with ath9k? Currently the hw_mode parameter found in hostapd.conf does not accept anything greater than g. Thanks -JD Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org> wrote: >> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>> For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1] >>> (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to >>> let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k: >>> >>> * >= 2.6.27.22 >>> * >= 2.6.28.10 >>> * 2.6.29 >>> >>> If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29. >>> If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285 >>> devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to >>> start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still >>> in RC series). >>> >>> As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or >>> another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to >>> be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for >>> stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3]. >>> >>> Luis >>> >>> [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k >>> [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download >>> [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable >>> >> Thanks for the update. If i want to use multiple AP's with Ath9k it it >> still best to use wireless-testing? Is multiple AP support in 2.6.30-rc >> series net-next or wireless-next? > > Yeah wireless-testing is best for that. I should also mention that if > you want to use AP mode you want to be at least on 2.6.29 (your own > kernel, not the compat-wireless one) if you care about Power Save > buffering on the AP as otherwise even if you use a compat-wireless > with code from > 2.6.29 those frames will be dropped. IIRC its due to > the way we use skb->cb for this and there not being a clean way to > backport this (so we just drop them). > > Luis > _______________________________________________ > ath9k-devel mailing list > ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org > https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k @ 2009-05-09 5:50 ` Jason Daly 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Jason Daly @ 2009-05-09 5:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Luis R. Rodriguez Cc: Karl Hiramoto, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-wireless, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thanks for the kernel info. How do you configure hostapd to work in N mode with ath9k? Currently the hw_mode parameter found in hostapd.conf does not accept anything greater than g. Thanks -JD Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Karl Hiramoto <karl@hiramoto.org> wrote: >> Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >>> For those not subscribed to the ath9k wiki on wireless.kernel.org [1] >>> (which we recommend you do if you're a user) here's a quick note to >>> let you know our latest kernel recommendations for using ath9k: >>> >>> * >= 2.6.27.22 >>> * >= 2.6.28.10 >>> * 2.6.29 >>> >>> If you want 802.11n support or AP support you'll want at least 2.6.29. >>> If you happen to have one of our new 1x1 AR9285 devices (all AR9285 >>> devices are 1x1) then you'll need at least 2.6.29. If you want to >>> start using ath9k on APs with AHB you will need at least 2.6.30 (still >>> in RC series). >>> >>> As usual if you happen to be stuck on older kernels for one reason or >>> another you can always use compat-wireless [2] and if that happens to >>> be a little too bleeding edge we have now compat-wireless releases for >>> stable kernel releases, starting as of the 2.6.30-rc series [3]. >>> >>> Luis >>> >>> [1] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k >>> [2] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download >>> [3] http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Download/stable >>> >> Thanks for the update. If i want to use multiple AP's with Ath9k it it >> still best to use wireless-testing? Is multiple AP support in 2.6.30-rc >> series net-next or wireless-next? > > Yeah wireless-testing is best for that. I should also mention that if > you want to use AP mode you want to be at least on 2.6.29 (your own > kernel, not the compat-wireless one) if you care about Power Save > buffering on the AP as otherwise even if you use a compat-wireless > with code from > 2.6.29 those frames will be dropped. IIRC its due to > the way we use skb->cb for this and there not being a clean way to > backport this (so we just drop them). > > Luis > _______________________________________________ > ath9k-devel mailing list > ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org > https://lists.ath9k.org/mailman/listinfo/ath9k-devel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k 2009-05-09 5:50 ` Jason Daly (?) @ 2009-05-08 9:02 ` Johannes Berg -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-05-08 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 01:50 -0400, Jason Daly wrote: > Thanks for the kernel info. > > How do you configure hostapd to work in N mode with ath9k? Currently > the hw_mode parameter found in hostapd.conf does not accept anything > greater than g. N isn't "greater than" G. N is more features than G. Just set the N options in the config file. You may need a git hostapd, I don't know for sure. Also, please set your clock and timezone correctly _before_ you say "thank you"!. You have posted on Sat, 09 May 2009 01:50:12 -0400 (07:50 CEST) which is clearly impossible. johannes -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20090508/3838a1a6/attachment.pgp ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k @ 2009-05-08 9:02 ` Johannes Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-05-08 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Daly Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez, Karl Hiramoto, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-wireless, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 603 bytes --] On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 01:50 -0400, Jason Daly wrote: > Thanks for the kernel info. > > How do you configure hostapd to work in N mode with ath9k? Currently > the hw_mode parameter found in hostapd.conf does not accept anything > greater than g. N isn't "greater than" G. N is more features than G. Just set the N options in the config file. You may need a git hostapd, I don't know for sure. Also, please set your clock and timezone correctly _before_ you say "thank you"!. You have posted on Sat, 09 May 2009 01:50:12 -0400 (07:50 CEST) which is clearly impossible. johannes [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k @ 2009-05-08 9:02 ` Johannes Berg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Johannes Berg @ 2009-05-08 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jason Daly Cc: Luis R. Rodriguez, Karl Hiramoto, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-wireless, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 603 bytes --] On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 01:50 -0400, Jason Daly wrote: > Thanks for the kernel info. > > How do you configure hostapd to work in N mode with ath9k? Currently > the hw_mode parameter found in hostapd.conf does not accept anything > greater than g. N isn't "greater than" G. N is more features than G. Just set the N options in the config file. You may need a git hostapd, I don't know for sure. Also, please set your clock and timezone correctly _before_ you say "thank you"!. You have posted on Sat, 09 May 2009 01:50:12 -0400 (07:50 CEST) which is clearly impossible. johannes [-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k 2009-05-08 9:02 ` Johannes Berg (?) @ 2009-05-08 17:15 ` Luis R. Rodriguez -1 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2009-05-08 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ath9k-devel On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:02:04AM -0700, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 01:50 -0400, Jason Daly wrote: > > Thanks for the kernel info. > > > > How do you configure hostapd to work in N mode with ath9k? Currently > > the hw_mode parameter found in hostapd.conf does not accept anything > > greater than g. > > N isn't "greater than" G. N is more features than G. Just set the N > options in the config file. You may need a git hostapd, I don't know for > sure. > > Also, please set your clock and timezone correctly _before_ you say > "thank you"!. You have posted on > Sat, 09 May 2009 01:50:12 -0400 (07:50 CEST) > > which is clearly impossible. > Also check out: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Documentation/hostapd Luis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k @ 2009-05-08 17:15 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2009-05-08 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Berg Cc: Jason Daly, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-wireless, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:02:04AM -0700, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 01:50 -0400, Jason Daly wrote: > > Thanks for the kernel info. > > > > How do you configure hostapd to work in N mode with ath9k? Currently > > the hw_mode parameter found in hostapd.conf does not accept anything > > greater than g. > > N isn't "greater than" G. N is more features than G. Just set the N > options in the config file. You may need a git hostapd, I don't know for > sure. > > Also, please set your clock and timezone correctly _before_ you say > "thank you"!. You have posted on > Sat, 09 May 2009 01:50:12 -0400 (07:50 CEST) > > which is clearly impossible. > Also check out: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Documentation/hostapd Luis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k @ 2009-05-08 17:15 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Luis R. Rodriguez @ 2009-05-08 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Johannes Berg Cc: Jason Daly, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-wireless, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:02:04AM -0700, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sat, 2009-05-09 at 01:50 -0400, Jason Daly wrote: > > Thanks for the kernel info. > > > > How do you configure hostapd to work in N mode with ath9k? Currently > > the hw_mode parameter found in hostapd.conf does not accept anything > > greater than g. > > N isn't "greater than" G. N is more features than G. Just set the N > options in the config file. You may need a git hostapd, I don't know for > sure. > > Also, please set your clock and timezone correctly _before_ you say > "thank you"!. You have posted on > Sat, 09 May 2009 01:50:12 -0400 (07:50 CEST) > > which is clearly impossible. > Also check out: http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Documentation/hostapd Luis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-05-09 5:50 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-05-07 8:04 [ath9k-devel] New kernel recommendations for ath9k Luis R. Rodriguez 2009-05-07 8:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 2009-05-07 8:04 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 2009-05-07 10:02 ` [ath9k-devel] " Karl Hiramoto 2009-05-07 10:02 ` Karl Hiramoto 2009-05-07 10:02 ` Karl Hiramoto 2009-05-07 17:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 2009-05-07 17:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 2009-05-07 17:20 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 2009-05-09 5:50 ` Jason Daly 2009-05-09 5:50 ` Jason Daly 2009-05-09 5:50 ` Jason Daly 2009-05-08 9:02 ` Johannes Berg 2009-05-08 9:02 ` Johannes Berg 2009-05-08 9:02 ` Johannes Berg 2009-05-08 17:15 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 2009-05-08 17:15 ` Luis R. Rodriguez 2009-05-08 17:15 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.