All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, riel@redhat.com,
	cl@linux-foundation.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
	linuxram@us.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Count the number of times zone_reclaim() scans and fails
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:05:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090616090509.GA14241@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090615141912.878168ca.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 02:19:12PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:47:53 +0100
> Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:
> 
> > +		PGSCAN_ZONERECLAIM_FAILED,
> > @@ -2492,6 +2492,9 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> > +	"zreclaim_failed",
> 
> So we have "zonereclaim", "zone_reclaim" and "zreclaim", which isn't
> terribly developer-friendly.
> 
> 
> This?
> 

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>

> --- a/include/linux/vmstat.h~vmscan-count-the-number-of-times-zone_reclaim-scans-and-fails-fix
> +++ a/include/linux/vmstat.h
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ enum vm_event_item { PGPGIN, PGPGOUT, PS
>  		FOR_ALL_ZONES(PGSCAN_KSWAPD),
>  		FOR_ALL_ZONES(PGSCAN_DIRECT),
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> -		PGSCAN_ZONERECLAIM_FAILED,
> +		PGSCAN_ZONE_RECLAIM_FAILED,
>  #endif
>  		PGINODESTEAL, SLABS_SCANNED, KSWAPD_STEAL, KSWAPD_INODESTEAL,
>  		PAGEOUTRUN, ALLOCSTALL, PGROTATED,
> diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~vmscan-count-the-number-of-times-zone_reclaim-scans-and-fails-fix mm/vmscan.c
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c~vmscan-count-the-number-of-times-zone_reclaim-scans-and-fails-fix
> +++ a/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2520,7 +2520,7 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_
>  	zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED);
>  
>  	if (!ret)
> -		count_vm_event(PGSCAN_ZONERECLAIM_FAILED);
> +		count_vm_event(PGSCAN_ZONE_RECLAIM_FAILED);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> diff -puN mm/vmstat.c~vmscan-count-the-number-of-times-zone_reclaim-scans-and-fails-fix mm/vmstat.c
> --- a/mm/vmstat.c~vmscan-count-the-number-of-times-zone_reclaim-scans-and-fails-fix
> +++ a/mm/vmstat.c
> @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static const char * const vmstat_text[] 
>  	TEXTS_FOR_ZONES("pgscan_direct")
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> -	"zreclaim_failed",
> +	"zone_reclaim_failed",
>  #endif
>  	"pginodesteal",
>  	"slabs_scanned",
> _
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, riel@redhat.com,
	cl@linux-foundation.org, fengguang.wu@intel.com,
	linuxram@us.ibm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Count the number of times zone_reclaim() scans and fails
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:05:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090616090509.GA14241@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090615141912.878168ca.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 02:19:12PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:47:53 +0100
> Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie> wrote:
> 
> > +		PGSCAN_ZONERECLAIM_FAILED,
> > @@ -2492,6 +2492,9 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> > +	"zreclaim_failed",
> 
> So we have "zonereclaim", "zone_reclaim" and "zreclaim", which isn't
> terribly developer-friendly.
> 
> 
> This?
> 

Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>

> --- a/include/linux/vmstat.h~vmscan-count-the-number-of-times-zone_reclaim-scans-and-fails-fix
> +++ a/include/linux/vmstat.h
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ enum vm_event_item { PGPGIN, PGPGOUT, PS
>  		FOR_ALL_ZONES(PGSCAN_KSWAPD),
>  		FOR_ALL_ZONES(PGSCAN_DIRECT),
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> -		PGSCAN_ZONERECLAIM_FAILED,
> +		PGSCAN_ZONE_RECLAIM_FAILED,
>  #endif
>  		PGINODESTEAL, SLABS_SCANNED, KSWAPD_STEAL, KSWAPD_INODESTEAL,
>  		PAGEOUTRUN, ALLOCSTALL, PGROTATED,
> diff -puN mm/vmscan.c~vmscan-count-the-number-of-times-zone_reclaim-scans-and-fails-fix mm/vmscan.c
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c~vmscan-count-the-number-of-times-zone_reclaim-scans-and-fails-fix
> +++ a/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2520,7 +2520,7 @@ int zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_
>  	zone_clear_flag(zone, ZONE_RECLAIM_LOCKED);
>  
>  	if (!ret)
> -		count_vm_event(PGSCAN_ZONERECLAIM_FAILED);
> +		count_vm_event(PGSCAN_ZONE_RECLAIM_FAILED);
>  
>  	return ret;
>  }
> diff -puN mm/vmstat.c~vmscan-count-the-number-of-times-zone_reclaim-scans-and-fails-fix mm/vmstat.c
> --- a/mm/vmstat.c~vmscan-count-the-number-of-times-zone_reclaim-scans-and-fails-fix
> +++ a/mm/vmstat.c
> @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static const char * const vmstat_text[] 
>  	TEXTS_FOR_ZONES("pgscan_direct")
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
> -	"zreclaim_failed",
> +	"zone_reclaim_failed",
>  #endif
>  	"pginodesteal",
>  	"slabs_scanned",
> _
> 

-- 
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student                          Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick                         IBM Dublin Software Lab

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2009-06-16  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-06-11 10:47 [PATCH 0/3] Fix malloc() stall in zone_reclaim() and bring behaviour more in line with expectations V3 Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 10:47 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 10:47 ` [PATCH 1/3] Properly account for the number of page cache pages zone_reclaim() can reclaim Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 10:47   ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 11:37   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-11 11:37     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-12 10:17     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-12 10:17       ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-15  4:51       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-15  4:51         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-15 10:05         ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-15 10:05           ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 10:47 ` [PATCH 2/3] Do not unconditionally treat zones that fail zone_reclaim() as full Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 10:47   ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 13:48   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-11 13:48     ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-12 10:36     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-12 10:36       ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-12 15:44       ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-12 15:44         ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-15 10:28         ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-15 10:28           ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-15 15:58           ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-15 15:58             ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-11 10:47 ` [PATCH 3/3] Count the number of times zone_reclaim() scans and fails Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 10:47   ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 11:33   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-11 11:33     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-15 21:19   ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-15 21:19     ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-16  9:05     ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2009-06-16  9:05       ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-11 23:30 ` [PATCH 0/3] Fix malloc() stall in zone_reclaim() and bring behaviour more in line with expectations V3 Andrew Morton
2009-06-11 23:30   ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-12 11:04   ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-12 11:04     ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-12 16:08     ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-12 16:08       ` Andrew Morton
2009-06-15  9:42     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-15  9:42       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-15 10:56       ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-15 10:56         ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-15 15:01         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 15:01           ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-15 15:25           ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-15 15:25             ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-16 12:08             ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-16 12:08               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-16 12:20               ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-16 12:20                 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-16 12:30                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-16 12:30                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-16 12:57         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-16 12:57           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-16 13:44           ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-16 13:44             ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-16 14:51             ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-16 14:51               ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-17 10:06               ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-17 10:06                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-06-17 12:03                 ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-17 12:03                   ` Mel Gorman
2009-06-17 18:48                 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-06-17 18:48                   ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090616090509.GA14241@csn.ul.ie \
    --to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.