From: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
To: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com>,
Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ia64, kdump: Mask MCA/INIT on freezing cpus
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:55:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090623055536.GE6865@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A4022EA.1020506@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 09:33:46AM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> Robin Holt wrote:
...
> Do you mean that the 2nd kernel should be able to handle MCA/INIT from its
> boot up? I guess the word PROM is nearly equal to PAL/SAL firmware, if so
> then I don't think there are good generic interface/procedure could be
> useful here. Do you have any concrete idea?
No concrete ideas. Just a really uneasy feeling whenever the INIT
is disabled.
On SGI's ia64 servers, when the INIT is first received, our PROM (PAL/SAL)
records the processors state. This record remains for the next reset
or for salinfo to transfer to disk. We can dump all the records in a
format somewhat similar to the output in /var/log/salinfo/decoded.
On more occasions than I could even begin to describe, those records
have helped us determine what the processor was doing despite it even
ignoring interrupts. This includes everything except when MCA/INIT
handling is disabled or PMIs are being processed.
If you could give this some consideration, I would appreciate it.
I really don't have the time to dedicate to thinking all the way through
and therefore will not stand in the way of any patch you propose.
If I can be of help in any way, please let me know.
Thanks,
Robin
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
To: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>, Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ia64, kdump: Mask MCA/INIT on freezing cpus
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:55:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090623055536.GE6865@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A4022EA.1020506@jp.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 09:33:46AM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
> Robin Holt wrote:
...
> Do you mean that the 2nd kernel should be able to handle MCA/INIT from its
> boot up? I guess the word PROM is nearly equal to PAL/SAL firmware, if so
> then I don't think there are good generic interface/procedure could be
> useful here. Do you have any concrete idea?
No concrete ideas. Just a really uneasy feeling whenever the INIT
is disabled.
On SGI's ia64 servers, when the INIT is first received, our PROM (PAL/SAL)
records the processors state. This record remains for the next reset
or for salinfo to transfer to disk. We can dump all the records in a
format somewhat similar to the output in /var/log/salinfo/decoded.
On more occasions than I could even begin to describe, those records
have helped us determine what the processor was doing despite it even
ignoring interrupts. This includes everything except when MCA/INIT
handling is disabled or PMIs are being processed.
If you could give this some consideration, I would appreciate it.
I really don't have the time to dedicate to thinking all the way through
and therefore will not stand in the way of any patch you propose.
If I can be of help in any way, please let me know.
Thanks,
Robin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-23 5:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-18 6:44 [PATCH 0/7] Patches for kdump vs. INIT Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:44 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:46 ` [PATCH 1/7] ia64, kdump: Mask MCA/INIT on freezing cpus Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:46 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-22 13:45 ` Robin Holt
2009-06-22 13:45 ` Robin Holt
2009-06-23 0:33 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-23 0:33 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-23 5:55 ` Robin Holt [this message]
2009-06-23 5:55 ` Robin Holt
2009-06-23 8:07 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-23 8:07 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-24 11:14 ` Robin Holt
2009-06-24 11:14 ` Robin Holt
2009-06-25 2:15 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-25 2:15 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-25 3:29 ` Robin Holt
2009-06-25 3:29 ` Robin Holt
2009-06-18 6:48 ` [PATCH 2/7] ia64, kexec: Make INIT safe while kdump/kexec Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:48 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:48 ` [PATCH 3/7] ia64, kexec: Unregister MCA handler before kexec Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:48 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:49 ` [PATCH 4/7] ia64, kdump: Don't offline APs Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:49 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:50 ` [PATCH 5/7] ia64, kdump: Mask INIT first in panic-kdump path Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:50 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:51 ` [PATCH 6/7] ia64, kdump: Try INIT regardless of kdump_on_init Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:51 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] ia64, kdump: Short path to freeze CPUs Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:53 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-22 6:31 ` [PATCH 0/7] Patches for kdump vs. INIT Jay Lan
2009-06-22 6:31 ` Jay Lan
2009-06-22 7:16 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-22 7:16 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:02 ` [PATCH v2 " Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:02 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:02 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] ia64, kdump: Mask MCA/INIT on frozen cpus Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:10 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:10 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ia64, kexec: Make INIT safe while transition to kdump/kexec kernel Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:11 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ia64, kexec: Make INIT safe while transition to kdump/kexec Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] ia64, kexec: Unregister MCA handler before kexec Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:12 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:12 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] ia64, kdump: Don't return APs to SAL from kdump Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:14 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:14 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] ia64, kdump: Mask INIT first in panic-kdump path Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:15 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:15 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:17 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] ia64, kdump: Try INIT regardless of kdump_on_init Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:17 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:17 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:18 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ia64, kdump: Short path to freeze CPUs Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:18 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:18 ` Hidetoshi Seto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090623055536.GE6865@sgi.com \
--to=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.