From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Jay Lan <jay.zen.lan@gmail.com>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Patches for kdump vs. INIT
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:16:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A3F2FB6.6040901@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5AA89A0287224699B8E5C0526CE0EA41@Lanx8664>
Jay Lan wrote:
> Kdump with INIT on IPF worked on SGI's IA64 servers when i left SGI last
> December.
> Is this problem something new to you after .27?
No.
This is a potential bug in design, in case of INIT+INIT and panic+INIT.
> SGI folks should test this patchset to ensure no surprise is introduced
> to their servers.
Any tests and comments would be appreciated.
Thanks,
H.Seto
_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Jay Lan <jay.zen.lan@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Haren Myneni <hbabu@us.ibm.com>,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Patches for kdump vs. INIT
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:16:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A3F2FB6.6040901@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5AA89A0287224699B8E5C0526CE0EA41@Lanx8664>
Jay Lan wrote:
> Kdump with INIT on IPF worked on SGI's IA64 servers when i left SGI last
> December.
> Is this problem something new to you after .27?
No.
This is a potential bug in design, in case of INIT+INIT and panic+INIT.
> SGI folks should test this patchset to ensure no surprise is introduced
> to their servers.
Any tests and comments would be appreciated.
Thanks,
H.Seto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-22 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-18 6:44 [PATCH 0/7] Patches for kdump vs. INIT Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:44 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:46 ` [PATCH 1/7] ia64, kdump: Mask MCA/INIT on freezing cpus Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:46 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-22 13:45 ` Robin Holt
2009-06-22 13:45 ` Robin Holt
2009-06-23 0:33 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-23 0:33 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-23 5:55 ` Robin Holt
2009-06-23 5:55 ` Robin Holt
2009-06-23 8:07 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-23 8:07 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-24 11:14 ` Robin Holt
2009-06-24 11:14 ` Robin Holt
2009-06-25 2:15 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-25 2:15 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-25 3:29 ` Robin Holt
2009-06-25 3:29 ` Robin Holt
2009-06-18 6:48 ` [PATCH 2/7] ia64, kexec: Make INIT safe while kdump/kexec Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:48 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:48 ` [PATCH 3/7] ia64, kexec: Unregister MCA handler before kexec Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:48 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:49 ` [PATCH 4/7] ia64, kdump: Don't offline APs Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:49 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:50 ` [PATCH 5/7] ia64, kdump: Mask INIT first in panic-kdump path Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:50 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:51 ` [PATCH 6/7] ia64, kdump: Try INIT regardless of kdump_on_init Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:51 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] ia64, kdump: Short path to freeze CPUs Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-18 6:53 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-06-22 6:31 ` [PATCH 0/7] Patches for kdump vs. INIT Jay Lan
2009-06-22 6:31 ` Jay Lan
2009-06-22 7:16 ` Hidetoshi Seto [this message]
2009-06-22 7:16 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:02 ` [PATCH v2 " Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:02 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:02 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] ia64, kdump: Mask MCA/INIT on frozen cpus Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:10 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:10 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ia64, kexec: Make INIT safe while transition to kdump/kexec kernel Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:11 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ia64, kexec: Make INIT safe while transition to kdump/kexec Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:12 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] ia64, kexec: Unregister MCA handler before kexec Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:12 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:12 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] ia64, kdump: Don't return APs to SAL from kdump Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:14 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:14 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] ia64, kdump: Mask INIT first in panic-kdump path Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:15 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:15 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:17 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] ia64, kdump: Try INIT regardless of kdump_on_init Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:17 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:17 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:18 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ia64, kdump: Short path to freeze CPUs Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:18 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2009-07-09 7:18 ` Hidetoshi Seto
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A3F2FB6.6040901@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jay.zen.lan@gmail.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.