From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
To: Alessandro Rubini <rubini-list@gnudd.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ads7846: allocate separate cache lines for tx and rx data
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 11:06:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200907151106.47917.david-b@pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090715093313.GA2897@mail.gnudd.com>
On Wednesday 15 July 2009, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> From: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>
>
> Since the SPI master might use DMA, tx and rx buffers must live on
> different cache lines.
Not true. Full duplex tranfsers using a single buffer are
explicitly allowed.
> Here one cache line is used for all tx and
> another for all rx. This will work whether the SPI master maps/unmaps
> one buffer at a time or all together. The patch only fixes the analog
> inputs, as touch screen operation is not affected, although I didn't
> check why. I tested on at91sam9263, where buffers are all mapped
> initially and unmapped individually at irq time.
If that spi_master driver mis-handles this, it's a bug in that
driver. (And I hope you were using a version of the '9263 chip
which fixed its SPI bugs. Initial silicon had a SPI controller
which was essentially unusuable in a multitasking environment.)
> The issue was discussed with Russell King on linux-arm-kernel.
Gee, but not with the author of that driver or the maintainer of
the SPI framework. Who could have pointed out instantly where
the true bug resides.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alessandro Rubini <rubini@gnudd.com>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-07-15 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-07-15 9:33 [PATCH] ads7846: allocate separate cache lines for tx and rx data Alessandro Rubini
2009-07-15 18:06 ` David Brownell [this message]
2009-07-15 19:33 ` Alessandro Rubini
2009-07-16 7:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-07-16 7:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-07-16 7:56 ` David Brownell
2009-07-16 7:28 ` David Brownell
2009-07-16 10:00 ` Marek Vasut
2009-07-16 15:35 ` David Brownell
2009-07-16 20:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-07-16 7:51 ` David Brownell
2009-07-16 8:15 ` Alessandro Rubini
2009-07-16 8:35 ` David Brownell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200907151106.47917.david-b@pacbell.net \
--to=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rubini-list@gnudd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.