From: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
To: Mark Kelly <mark@bifferos.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch, v2] x86: CPU detection for RDC
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:21:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200908181121.26886.florian@openwrt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0908170746040.28730@cent.localnet>
Hi Mark,
Le Monday 17 August 2009 09:13:58 Mark Kelly, vous avez écrit :
> On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 08/17/2009 02:31 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > I thought it was to prevent oopses for zero cpu according
> > > to the reporter?
> > >
> > > But these oopses should be probably separately fixed anyways.
> >
> > They should.
>
> Perhaps, but they don't need to be. Unfortunately I was testing up to
> 2.6.30.5 (which gives the Oops), but someone must have changed the
> detection code for 486 in Linus' tree, because when I tried that (at
> Ingo's suggestion) I magically got a boot, and a correctly recognised
> 486 without my patch. This does rather remove my reason for the patch
> submission, but I will carry on if people think this is still worthwhile.
>
> With the above in mind we can give up on detection without fear of a
> subsequent Oops, so I've simplified the code to not bother with
> the unrecognised variants (still gives a warning).
>
> I've added the PCI config dependency, and the runtime check. I'll call
> this v2, please ignore all the previous patches. It's against
> 2.6.31-rc6-tip.
Thanks for doing that.
>
> regards,
> Mark.
>
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Kelly <mark@bifferos.com>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <florian@openwrt.org>
> diff --git a/Documentation/x86/rdc.txt b/Documentation/x86/rdc.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..f9591af
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/rdc.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> +
> +Introduction
> +============
> +
> +RDC (http://www.rdc.com.tw) have been manufacturing x86-compatible SoC
> +(system-on-chips) for a number of years. They are not the fastest of
> +CPUs (clock speeds ranging from 133-150MHz) but 486SX compatibility
> +coupled with very low power consumption[1] and low cost make them ideal
> +for embedded applications.
> +
> +
> +Where to find
> +=============
> +
> +RDC chips show up in numerous embedded devices, but be careful since
> +many of them will not run Linux 2.6 without significant expertise.
> +
> +There are several variants of what the linux kernel refers to generically
> +as RDC321X: R8610, R321x, S3282 and AMRISC20000.
> +
> +R321x: Found in various routers, see the OpenWrt project for details,
> + http://wiki.openwrt.org/oldwiki/rdcport
> +
> +R8610: Found on the RDC evaluation board
> + http://www.ivankuten.com/system-on-chip-soc/rdc-r8610/
> +
> +AMRISC20000: Found in the MGB-100 wireless hard disk
> + http://tintuc.no-ip.com/linux/tipps/mgb100/
> +
> +S3282: Found in various NAS devices, including the Bifferboard
> + http://www.bifferos.com
> +
> +
> +Kernel Configuration
> +====================
> +
> +Add support for this CPU with CONFIG_X86_RDC321X. Ensure that maths
> +emulation is included (CONFIG_MATH_EMULATION selected) and avoid MCE
> +(CONFIG_X86_MCE not selected).
> +
> +
> +CPU detection
> +=============
> +
> +None of these chips support the cpuid instruction, so as with some
> +other x86 compatible SoCs, we must check the north bridge and look
> +for specific 'signature' PCI device config.
> +
> +The current detection code has been tested only on the Bifferboard
> +(S3282 CPU), please send bug reports or success stories with
> +other devices to bifferos@yahoo.co.uk.
> +
> +
> +Credits
> +=======
> +
> +Many thanks to RDC for providing the customer codes to allow
> +detection of all known variants, without which this detection code
> +would have been very hard to ascertain.
> +
> +
> +References
> +==========
> +
> +[1] S3282 in certain NAS solutions consumes less than 1W
> +
> +
> +mark@bifferos.com 2009
> +
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 1655b77..5d2bcaa 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ config X86_RDC321X
> bool "RDC R-321x SoC"
> depends on X86_32
> depends on X86_EXTENDED_PLATFORM
> + select PCI
> select M486
> select X86_REBOOTFIXUPS
> ---help---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h index 2b03f70..75b96e9 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -122,7 +122,8 @@ struct cpuinfo_x86 {
> #define X86_VENDOR_CENTAUR 5
> #define X86_VENDOR_TRANSMETA 7
> #define X86_VENDOR_NSC 8
> -#define X86_VENDOR_NUM 9
> +#define X86_VENDOR_RDC 9
> +#define X86_VENDOR_NUM 10
>
> #define X86_VENDOR_UNKNOWN 0xff
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> index 3efcb2b..55ba09a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_CYRIX_32) += cyrix.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_CENTAUR) += centaur.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_TRANSMETA_32) += transmeta.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_UMC_32) += umc.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_X86_RDC321X) += rdc.o
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_PERF_COUNTERS) += perf_counter.o
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdc.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..369a671
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/rdc.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> +/*
> + * See Documentation/x86/rdc.txt
> + *
> + * mark@bifferos.com
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <asm/pci-direct.h>
> +#include "cpu.h"
> +
> +
> +static void __cpuinit rdc_identify(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> +{
> + u16 vendor, device;
> + u32 customer_id;
> +
> + if (!early_pci_allowed())
> + return;
> +
> + /* RDC CPU is SoC (system-on-chip), Northbridge is always present */
> + vendor = read_pci_config_16(0, 0, 0, PCI_VENDOR_ID);
> + device = read_pci_config_16(0, 0, 0, PCI_DEVICE_ID);
> +
> + if (vendor != PCI_VENDOR_ID_RDC || device != PCI_DEVICE_ID_RDC_R6020)
> + return; /* not RDC */
> + /*
> + * NB: We could go on and check other devices, e.g. r6040 NIC, but
> + * that's probably overkill
> + */
> +
> + customer_id = read_pci_config(0, 0, 0, 0x90);
> +
> + switch (customer_id) {
> + /* id names are from RDC */
> + case 0x00321000:
> + strcpy(c->x86_model_id, "R3210/R3211");
> + break;
> + case 0x00321001:
> + strcpy(c->x86_model_id, "AMITRISC20000/20010");
> + break;
> + case 0x00321002:
> + strcpy(c->x86_model_id, "R3210X/Edimax");
> + break;
> + case 0x00321003:
> + strcpy(c->x86_model_id, "R3210/Kcodes");
> + break;
> + case 0x00321004: /* tested */
> + strcpy(c->x86_model_id, "S3282/CodeTek");
> + break;
> + case 0x00321007:
> + strcpy(c->x86_model_id, "R8610");
> + break;
> + default:
> + pr_info("RDC CPU: Unrecognised Customer ID (0x%x) please report to
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\n", customer_id); + return;
> + }
> +
> + strcpy(c->x86_vendor_id, "RDC");
> + c->x86_vendor = X86_VENDOR_RDC;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct cpu_dev __cpuinitconst rdc_cpu_dev = {
> + .c_vendor = "RDC",
> + .c_ident = { "RDC" },
> + .c_identify = rdc_identify,
> + .c_x86_vendor = X86_VENDOR_RDC,
> +};
> +
> +cpu_dev_register(rdc_cpu_dev);
--
Best regards, Florian Fainelli
Email: florian@openwrt.org
Web: http://openwrt.org
IRC: [florian] on irc.freenode.net
-------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-18 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-16 15:46 [patch] x86 CPU detection for RDC Mark Kelly
2009-08-16 15:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-16 2:20 ` Mark Kelly
2009-08-16 17:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-16 3:35 ` Mark Kelly
2009-08-17 17:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-17 18:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-17 18:22 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-17 18:46 ` Andi Kleen
2009-08-17 18:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-17 21:31 ` Andi Kleen
2009-08-17 22:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-17 7:13 ` [patch, v2] x86: " Mark Kelly
2009-08-18 9:21 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2009-08-18 10:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-08-18 2:56 ` [patch, v3] " Mark Kelly
2009-08-17 18:58 ` [patch] x86 " H. Peter Anvin
2009-08-17 13:44 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200908181121.26886.florian@openwrt.org \
--to=florian@openwrt.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark@bifferos.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.