All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: remove unused code in delay.S
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:41:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909151541.08852.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253017761.3273.117.camel@linux-1lbu>

Dne ?t 15. z??? 2009 14:29:21 Steve Chen napsal(a):
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 12:37 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > >> > Because then you get it whenever you configure for V4 as the
> > > >> > lowest denominator CPU, which leads to the buggy behaviour on
> > > >> > better CPUs. It's far better to leave it as is and just accept
> > > >> > that the old CPUs will have longer than necessary delays.  If
> > > >> > people really really care (and there's likely to only be a small
> > > >> > minority of them now) changing the '0' to a '1' is a very simple
> > > >> > change for them to carry in their local tree.  Unlike getting the
> > > >> > right unrolling etc.
> > > >>
> > > >> Well, they can also 'git revert' this patch. If somebody really
> > > >> cares I think they should shout now and provide a better patch,
> > > >> otherwise this one should be merged.
> > > >
> > > > On the other hand, having the code there as it currently stands is
> > > > not harmful in any way, so leaving it there is just as easy.
> > >
> > > It makes the code less understandable. I'm not sure about linux's
> > > practices, but an #if 0 generally means somebody is being lazy.
> >
> > Not in this case, as you was explained to you. You may want to add
> > explaining comment above #if 0....
> > 								Pavel
> 
> Perhaps we can document with something like..
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index aef63c8..ca8d535 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -813,6 +813,14 @@ config ARM_ERRATA_460075
>  	  ACTLR register. Note that setting specific bits in the ACTLR
> register
>  	  may not be available in non-secure mode.
> 
> +config OLD_CPU_DELAY
> +	depends on CPU_32v3 || CPU_32v4 || CPU_32v4T
> +	bool "Accurate delays for older CPU"
> +	def_bool n
> +	help
> +	  Enable if observing longer than expected delays and need more
> +	  accurate delays on older CPUs.
> +
>  endmenu
> 
>  source "arch/arm/common/Kconfig"
> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/delay.S b/arch/arm/lib/delay.S
> index 8d6a876..8b3fa63 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/lib/delay.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/delay.S
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ ENTRY(__const_udelay)				@ 0 <= r0 <= 0x7fffff06
>  @ Delay routine
>  ENTRY(__delay)
>  		subs	r0, r0, #1
> -#if 0
> +#if CONFIG_OLD_CPU_DELAY

ifdef please

>  		movls	pc, lr
>  		subs	r0, r0, #1
>  		movls	pc, lr
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: Steve Chen <schen@mvista.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>,
	Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>,
	"Russell King - ARM Linux" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: remove unused code in delay.S
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:41:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200909151541.08852.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253017761.3273.117.camel@linux-1lbu>

Dne Út 15. září 2009 14:29:21 Steve Chen napsal(a):
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 12:37 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > >> > Because then you get it whenever you configure for V4 as the
> > > >> > lowest denominator CPU, which leads to the buggy behaviour on
> > > >> > better CPUs. It's far better to leave it as is and just accept
> > > >> > that the old CPUs will have longer than necessary delays.  If
> > > >> > people really really care (and there's likely to only be a small
> > > >> > minority of them now) changing the '0' to a '1' is a very simple
> > > >> > change for them to carry in their local tree.  Unlike getting the
> > > >> > right unrolling etc.
> > > >>
> > > >> Well, they can also 'git revert' this patch. If somebody really
> > > >> cares I think they should shout now and provide a better patch,
> > > >> otherwise this one should be merged.
> > > >
> > > > On the other hand, having the code there as it currently stands is
> > > > not harmful in any way, so leaving it there is just as easy.
> > >
> > > It makes the code less understandable. I'm not sure about linux's
> > > practices, but an #if 0 generally means somebody is being lazy.
> >
> > Not in this case, as you was explained to you. You may want to add
> > explaining comment above #if 0....
> > 								Pavel
> 
> Perhaps we can document with something like..
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> index aef63c8..ca8d535 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
> @@ -813,6 +813,14 @@ config ARM_ERRATA_460075
>  	  ACTLR register. Note that setting specific bits in the ACTLR
> register
>  	  may not be available in non-secure mode.
> 
> +config OLD_CPU_DELAY
> +	depends on CPU_32v3 || CPU_32v4 || CPU_32v4T
> +	bool "Accurate delays for older CPU"
> +	def_bool n
> +	help
> +	  Enable if observing longer than expected delays and need more
> +	  accurate delays on older CPUs.
> +
>  endmenu
> 
>  source "arch/arm/common/Kconfig"
> diff --git a/arch/arm/lib/delay.S b/arch/arm/lib/delay.S
> index 8d6a876..8b3fa63 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/lib/delay.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/lib/delay.S
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ ENTRY(__const_udelay)				@ 0 <= r0 <= 0x7fffff06
>  @ Delay routine
>  ENTRY(__delay)
>  		subs	r0, r0, #1
> -#if 0
> +#if CONFIG_OLD_CPU_DELAY

ifdef please

>  		movls	pc, lr
>  		subs	r0, r0, #1
>  		movls	pc, lr
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-15 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-13 21:05 [PATCH] arm: remove unused code in delay.S Felipe Contreras
2009-09-13 21:05 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-13 21:28 ` Marek Vasut
2009-09-13 21:28   ` Marek Vasut
2009-09-13 23:00   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-13 23:00     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-14  0:21     ` Jamie Lokier
2009-09-14  0:21       ` Jamie Lokier
2009-09-14  8:10       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-14  8:10         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-14 12:58         ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 12:58           ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 14:00           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-14 14:00             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-14 14:38             ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 14:38               ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 14:40               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-14 14:40                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-14 15:14                 ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 15:14                   ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 15:21                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-14 15:21                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-14 15:50                     ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 15:50                       ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 16:25                       ` Marek Vasut
2009-09-14 16:25                         ` Marek Vasut
2009-09-14 16:54                         ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 16:54                           ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 15:36                   ` Wolfram Sang
2009-09-14 15:36                     ` Wolfram Sang
2009-09-14 16:06                     ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 16:06                       ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-14 16:24                       ` Wolfram Sang
2009-09-14 16:24                         ` Wolfram Sang
2009-09-15 10:37                   ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-15 10:37                     ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-15 10:47                     ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-15 10:47                       ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-15 10:49                       ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-15 10:49                         ` Pavel Machek
2009-09-15 11:20                         ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-15 11:20                           ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-15 12:29                     ` Steve Chen
2009-09-15 12:29                       ` Steve Chen
2009-09-15 13:41                       ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2009-09-15 13:41                         ` Marek Vasut
2009-09-15 16:30                         ` Steve Chen
2009-09-15 16:30                           ` Steve Chen
2009-09-15 18:58                           ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-15 18:58                             ` Felipe Contreras
2009-09-15 19:44                             ` Steve Chen
2009-09-15 19:44                               ` Steve Chen
2009-09-15 20:39                               ` Marek Vasut
2009-09-15 20:39                                 ` Marek Vasut
2009-09-15 21:04                               ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-09-15 21:04                                 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-09-15 22:26                                 ` Steve Chen
2009-09-15 22:26                                   ` Steve Chen
2009-09-15 22:47                                   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-09-15 22:47                                     ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-09-16  8:26                                     ` Steve Chen
2009-09-16  8:26                                       ` Steve Chen
2009-09-16 12:30                                       ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-09-16 12:30                                         ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-09-16 14:49                                         ` Steve Chen
2009-09-16 14:49                                           ` Steve Chen
2009-09-16 20:21                                           ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-09-16 20:21                                             ` Sergei Shtylyov
2009-09-16 13:47                                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-16 13:47                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-17 19:32                                   ` Jamie Lokier
2009-09-17 19:32                                     ` Jamie Lokier
2009-09-17 19:41                                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-17 19:41                                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2009-09-17 21:29                                       ` [PATCH v2] " Steve Chen
2009-09-17 21:29                                         ` Steve Chen
2009-09-17 21:37                                         ` Jamie Lokier
2009-09-17 21:37                                           ` Jamie Lokier
2009-09-17 22:25                                           ` Steve Chen
2009-09-17 22:25                                             ` Steve Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200909151541.08852.marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --to=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.