All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: fix bdi_unregister() before sb kill
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:40:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090918064006.GU23126@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1253229410.2783.16.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>

On Thu, Sep 17 2009, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 21:40 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 17 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > This can cause a hang on NFS umount, since the bdi gets pruned before we
> > > flush any pending dirty IO. Peter, can you check whether it fixes your
> > > issue?
> > 
> > There's another problem with NFS && backing devices. NFS may call
> > bdi_destroy() on a bdi without ever called bdi_init(). This was always a
> > bad idea, now it's an issue.
> > 
> > So, Trond, can I safely add a server->flags private flag to indicate
> > that we have called bdi_init()? Then nfs_free_server() knows when to
> > call bdi_destroy(). Seems like the safest fix, since error handling is
> > currently 'just call nfs_free_server()'.
> 
> Urgh... Is there any reason why we can't just move the call to
> bdi_init() into nfs_bdi_register()? It seems bizarre to have to
> initialise the backing_dev_info twice like this...

No reason at all, I don't know why it was implemented that way
originally.

> If we do that, then we can just look at the BDI_registered state flag in
> order to figure out if we need to call bdi_unregister()

That's not exactly pretty either, diving into internal bdi details to
find out if we did an init/register of the device. BDI_registered is
just a debug flag, it may even go away again shortly.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  reply	other threads:[~2009-09-18  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-09-17 12:42 [PATCH] nfs: fix bdi_unregister() before sb kill Jens Axboe
2009-09-17 19:40 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-17 19:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-17 19:48     ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-17 23:16   ` Trond Myklebust
2009-09-18  6:40     ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2009-09-18 15:02       ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-18 16:19         ` Trond Myklebust
2009-09-18 17:36           ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-18 18:32             ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-18 18:40               ` Trond Myklebust
2009-09-18 18:46                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-18 20:01                   ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-18 20:05                     ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-18 20:11                       ` Trond Myklebust
2009-09-18 20:16               ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-18 20:22                 ` Jens Axboe
2009-09-18 20:38                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-09-18 20:44                     ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090918064006.GU23126@kernel.dk \
    --to=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.