* u8500 paches are being held ( was My first patch to the mailist, but being held)
@ 2009-09-22 14:05 Srinidhi KASAGAR
2009-09-23 3:58 ` Ben Dooks
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Srinidhi KASAGAR @ 2009-09-22 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
David,
I have posted a series of patches (u8500 machine support) today and one among them was 48K which was being held by the infradead server. Do you still consider the patches of size > 40 KB are suspects? Should I need to repost the whole patch series by splitting it to match 'your 40K' limit OR is there any possibility that the patch get posted to the list?
git format-patch -M did not help either.
regards,
srinidhi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* u8500 paches are being held ( was My first patch to the mailist, but being held)
2009-09-22 14:05 u8500 paches are being held ( was My first patch to the mailist, but being held) Srinidhi KASAGAR
@ 2009-09-23 3:58 ` Ben Dooks
2009-09-23 7:17 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2009-09-23 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 04:05:04PM +0200, Srinidhi KASAGAR wrote:
> David,
>
> I have posted a series of patches (u8500 machine support) today and one among them was 48K which was being held by the infradead server. Do you still consider the patches of size > 40 KB are suspects? Should I need to repost the whole patch series by splitting it to match 'your 40K' limit OR is there any possibility that the patch get posted to the list?
>
> git format-patch -M did not help either.
I've always felt that patches that big are probably too big to review
properly anyway. But that's just my personal view on the matter.
PS, word-wrap your postings to under 77 characters per line.
--
Ben
Q: What's a light-year?
A: One-third less calories than a regular year.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* u8500 paches are being held ( was My first patch to the mailist, but being held)
2009-09-23 3:58 ` Ben Dooks
@ 2009-09-23 7:17 ` Pavel Machek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2009-09-23 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed 2009-09-23 04:58:45, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 04:05:04PM +0200, Srinidhi KASAGAR wrote:
> > David,
> >
> > I have posted a series of patches (u8500 machine support) today and one among them was 48K which was being held by the infradead server. Do you still consider the patches of size > 40 KB are suspects? Should I need to repost the whole patch series by splitting it to match 'your 40K' limit OR is there any possibility that the patch get posted to the list?
> >
> > git format-patch -M did not help either.
>
> I've always felt that patches that big are probably too big to review
> properly anyway. But that's just my personal view on the matter.
Well, not all patches that go to the list are for review/submit. Some
of them are for info etc...
(Plus, stuff like MSM dsp support is quite hard to split :-()
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-09-23 7:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-09-22 14:05 u8500 paches are being held ( was My first patch to the mailist, but being held) Srinidhi KASAGAR
2009-09-23 3:58 ` Ben Dooks
2009-09-23 7:17 ` Pavel Machek
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.