From: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
To: Nix <nix-dKoSMcxRz+Te9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts prevent I2C bus and temperature sensors being visible
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:43:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090926134349.01580d9e@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ws3maqf2.fsf-AdTWujXS48Mg67Zj9sPl2A@public.gmane.org>
Hello man with no name,
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:36:33 +0100, Nix wrote:
> [Sorry for the huge Cc:, but this problem may cross subsystems: at least
> I have no idea which subsystem the problem is in.]
>
> My desktop system is a newish Nehalem with PCIe (of course), the usual
> coretemp sensor, and a Winbond W83667HG on the I2C bus. In 2.6.30.5,
> this all worked, but in 2.6.31.1 the latter sensor isn't found. The boot
> log says, in part (full log appended):
>
> [ 0.929754] i2c /dev entries driver
> [ 0.929821] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT C -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> [ 0.929887] ACPI: I/O resource 0000:00:1f.3 [0x400-0x41f] conflicts with ACPI region SMRG [0x400-0x40f]
> [ 0.929955] ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver
> [ 0.930003] i801_smbus: probe of 0000:00:1f.3 failed with error -16
> [ 0.930077] coretemp coretemp.0: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930156] coretemp coretemp.1: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930228] coretemp coretemp.2: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930304] coretemp coretemp.3: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930375] coretemp coretemp.4: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930448] coretemp coretemp.5: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930521] coretemp coretemp.6: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930596] coretemp coretemp.7: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930682] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG chip at 0x290
> [ 0.930736] ACPI: I/O resource w83627ehf [0x295-0x296] conflicts with ACPI region HWRE [0x290-0x299]
> [ 0.930804] ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver
>
> 2.6.30.x said (I didn't have coretemp built in back then):
>
> [ 40.297764] i2c /dev entries driver
> [ 40.297830] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT C -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> [ 40.297952] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG chip at 0x290
>
> Note: coretemp is not at fault, I just built it in because I wanted
> *some* sort of temperature monitoring. Here's the same part of my first
> 2.6.31.x boot log, without coretemp:
>
> [ 0.931782] i2c /dev entries driver
> [ 0.931848] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT C -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> [ 0.931914] ACPI: I/O resource 0000:00:1f.3 [0x400-0x41f] conflicts with ACPI region SMRG [0x400-0x40f]
> [ 0.931982] ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver
> [ 0.932031] i801_smbus: probe of 0000:00:1f.3 failed with error -16
> [ 0.932109] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG chip at 0x290
> [ 0.932163] ACPI: I/O resource w83627ehf [0x295-0x296] conflicts with ACPI region HWRE [0x290-0x299]
> [ 0.932231] ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver
>
> The only kernel patch installed is TuxOnIce, and that too was installed
> and working in 2.6.30 and has hardly changed since then. (I very much
> doubt it gets involved in bus probes anyway, but I could verify that
> the regression still happens without it if need be.)
>
> I can bisect for this if you wish.
You didn't do your homework. This issue has been reported several dozen
times already, both on LKML and on bugzilla. And it is fully documented
here:
http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/FAQ/Chapter3#Mysensorshavestoppedworkinginkernel2.6.31
--
Jean Delvare
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:43:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090926134349.01580d9e@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ws3maqf2.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix>
Hello man with no name,
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:36:33 +0100, Nix wrote:
> [Sorry for the huge Cc:, but this problem may cross subsystems: at least
> I have no idea which subsystem the problem is in.]
>
> My desktop system is a newish Nehalem with PCIe (of course), the usual
> coretemp sensor, and a Winbond W83667HG on the I2C bus. In 2.6.30.5,
> this all worked, but in 2.6.31.1 the latter sensor isn't found. The boot
> log says, in part (full log appended):
>
> [ 0.929754] i2c /dev entries driver
> [ 0.929821] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT C -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> [ 0.929887] ACPI: I/O resource 0000:00:1f.3 [0x400-0x41f] conflicts with ACPI region SMRG [0x400-0x40f]
> [ 0.929955] ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver
> [ 0.930003] i801_smbus: probe of 0000:00:1f.3 failed with error -16
> [ 0.930077] coretemp coretemp.0: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930156] coretemp coretemp.1: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930228] coretemp coretemp.2: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930304] coretemp coretemp.3: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930375] coretemp coretemp.4: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930448] coretemp coretemp.5: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930521] coretemp coretemp.6: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930596] coretemp coretemp.7: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930682] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG chip at 0x290
> [ 0.930736] ACPI: I/O resource w83627ehf [0x295-0x296] conflicts with ACPI region HWRE [0x290-0x299]
> [ 0.930804] ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver
>
> 2.6.30.x said (I didn't have coretemp built in back then):
>
> [ 40.297764] i2c /dev entries driver
> [ 40.297830] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT C -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> [ 40.297952] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG chip at 0x290
>
> Note: coretemp is not at fault, I just built it in because I wanted
> *some* sort of temperature monitoring. Here's the same part of my first
> 2.6.31.x boot log, without coretemp:
>
> [ 0.931782] i2c /dev entries driver
> [ 0.931848] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT C -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> [ 0.931914] ACPI: I/O resource 0000:00:1f.3 [0x400-0x41f] conflicts with ACPI region SMRG [0x400-0x40f]
> [ 0.931982] ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver
> [ 0.932031] i801_smbus: probe of 0000:00:1f.3 failed with error -16
> [ 0.932109] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG chip at 0x290
> [ 0.932163] ACPI: I/O resource w83627ehf [0x295-0x296] conflicts with ACPI region HWRE [0x290-0x299]
> [ 0.932231] ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver
>
> The only kernel patch installed is TuxOnIce, and that too was installed
> and working in 2.6.30 and has hardly changed since then. (I very much
> doubt it gets involved in bus probes anyway, but I could verify that
> the regression still happens without it if need be.)
>
> I can bisect for this if you wish.
You didn't do your homework. This issue has been reported several dozen
times already, both on LKML and on bugzilla. And it is fully documented
here:
http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/FAQ/Chapter3#Mysensorshavestoppedworkinginkernel2.6.31
--
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
To: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts prevent I2C bus and temperature sensors being visible
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:43:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090926134349.01580d9e@hyperion.delvare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ws3maqf2.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix>
Hello man with no name,
On Sat, 26 Sep 2009 12:36:33 +0100, Nix wrote:
> [Sorry for the huge Cc:, but this problem may cross subsystems: at least
> I have no idea which subsystem the problem is in.]
>
> My desktop system is a newish Nehalem with PCIe (of course), the usual
> coretemp sensor, and a Winbond W83667HG on the I2C bus. In 2.6.30.5,
> this all worked, but in 2.6.31.1 the latter sensor isn't found. The boot
> log says, in part (full log appended):
>
> [ 0.929754] i2c /dev entries driver
> [ 0.929821] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT C -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> [ 0.929887] ACPI: I/O resource 0000:00:1f.3 [0x400-0x41f] conflicts with ACPI region SMRG [0x400-0x40f]
> [ 0.929955] ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver
> [ 0.930003] i801_smbus: probe of 0000:00:1f.3 failed with error -16
> [ 0.930077] coretemp coretemp.0: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930156] coretemp coretemp.1: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930228] coretemp coretemp.2: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930304] coretemp coretemp.3: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930375] coretemp coretemp.4: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930448] coretemp coretemp.5: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930521] coretemp coretemp.6: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930596] coretemp coretemp.7: Using relative temperature scale!
> [ 0.930682] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG chip at 0x290
> [ 0.930736] ACPI: I/O resource w83627ehf [0x295-0x296] conflicts with ACPI region HWRE [0x290-0x299]
> [ 0.930804] ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver
>
> 2.6.30.x said (I didn't have coretemp built in back then):
>
> [ 40.297764] i2c /dev entries driver
> [ 40.297830] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT C -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> [ 40.297952] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG chip at 0x290
>
> Note: coretemp is not at fault, I just built it in because I wanted
> *some* sort of temperature monitoring. Here's the same part of my first
> 2.6.31.x boot log, without coretemp:
>
> [ 0.931782] i2c /dev entries driver
> [ 0.931848] i801_smbus 0000:00:1f.3: PCI INT C -> GSI 18 (level, low) -> IRQ 18
> [ 0.931914] ACPI: I/O resource 0000:00:1f.3 [0x400-0x41f] conflicts with ACPI region SMRG [0x400-0x40f]
> [ 0.931982] ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver
> [ 0.932031] i801_smbus: probe of 0000:00:1f.3 failed with error -16
> [ 0.932109] w83627ehf: Found W83667HG chip at 0x290
> [ 0.932163] ACPI: I/O resource w83627ehf [0x295-0x296] conflicts with ACPI region HWRE [0x290-0x299]
> [ 0.932231] ACPI: Device needs an ACPI driver
>
> The only kernel patch installed is TuxOnIce, and that too was installed
> and working in 2.6.30 and has hardly changed since then. (I very much
> doubt it gets involved in bus probes anyway, but I could verify that
> the regression still happens without it if need be.)
>
> I can bisect for this if you wish.
You didn't do your homework. This issue has been reported several dozen
times already, both on LKML and on bugzilla. And it is fully documented
here:
http://www.lm-sensors.org/wiki/FAQ/Chapter3#Mysensorshavestoppedworkinginkernel2.6.31
--
Jean Delvare
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-26 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-26 11:36 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts prevent I2C bus and temperature sensors being visible Nix
2009-09-26 11:36 ` [lm-sensors] 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts prevent Nix
[not found] ` <87ws3maqf2.fsf-AdTWujXS48Mg67Zj9sPl2A@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-26 11:43 ` Jean Delvare [this message]
2009-09-26 11:43 ` 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts prevent I2C bus and temperature sensors being visible Jean Delvare
2009-09-26 11:43 ` [lm-sensors] 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20090926134349.01580d9e-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-26 13:54 ` 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts prevent I2C bus and temperature sensors being visible Nix
2009-09-26 13:54 ` Nix
2009-09-26 13:54 ` [lm-sensors] 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts Nix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090926134349.01580d9e@hyperion.delvare \
--to=khali-puyad+kwke1g9huczpvpmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=nix-dKoSMcxRz+Te9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.