From: Nix <nix-dKoSMcxRz+Te9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
To: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts prevent I2C bus and temperature sensors being visible
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:54:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87my4hbyla.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090926134349.01580d9e-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org> (Jean Delvare's message of "Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:43:49 +0200")
On 26 Sep 2009, Jean Delvare told this:
> Hello man with no name,
I've used 'Nix' consistently in real life and on the net for twenty
years now. I think that counts. :)
> You didn't do your homework. This issue has been reported several dozen
> times already, both on LKML and on bugzilla. And it is fully documented
> here:
My google-fu is obviously weak today. Apologies for wasting your
time. (I even looked at the lm-sensors FAQ, but still missed it.)
(And there is a workaround! Yay! You guys think of everything...)
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:54:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87my4hbyla.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090926134349.01580d9e@hyperion.delvare> (Jean Delvare's message of "Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:43:49 +0200")
On 26 Sep 2009, Jean Delvare told this:
> Hello man with no name,
I've used 'Nix' consistently in real life and on the net for twenty
years now. I think that counts. :)
> You didn't do your homework. This issue has been reported several dozen
> times already, both on LKML and on bugzilla. And it is fully documented
> here:
My google-fu is obviously weak today. Apologies for wasting your
time. (I even looked at the lm-sensors FAQ, but still missed it.)
(And there is a workaround! Yay! You guys think of everything...)
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
To: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts prevent I2C bus and temperature sensors being visible
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:54:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87my4hbyla.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090926134349.01580d9e@hyperion.delvare> (Jean Delvare's message of "Sat, 26 Sep 2009 13:43:49 +0200")
On 26 Sep 2009, Jean Delvare told this:
> Hello man with no name,
I've used 'Nix' consistently in real life and on the net for twenty
years now. I think that counts. :)
> You didn't do your homework. This issue has been reported several dozen
> times already, both on LKML and on bugzilla. And it is fully documented
> here:
My google-fu is obviously weak today. Apologies for wasting your
time. (I even looked at the lm-sensors FAQ, but still missed it.)
(And there is a workaround! Yay! You guys think of everything...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-26 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-26 11:36 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts prevent I2C bus and temperature sensors being visible Nix
2009-09-26 11:36 ` [lm-sensors] 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts prevent Nix
[not found] ` <87ws3maqf2.fsf-AdTWujXS48Mg67Zj9sPl2A@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-26 11:43 ` 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts prevent I2C bus and temperature sensors being visible Jean Delvare
2009-09-26 11:43 ` Jean Delvare
2009-09-26 11:43 ` [lm-sensors] 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20090926134349.01580d9e-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-09-26 13:54 ` Nix [this message]
2009-09-26 13:54 ` 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts prevent I2C bus and temperature sensors being visible Nix
2009-09-26 13:54 ` [lm-sensors] 2.6.31 regression: brand-new ACPI conflicts Nix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87my4hbyla.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix \
--to=nix-dkosmcxrz+te9xe1eozjha@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=lm-sensors-GZX6beZjE8VD60Wz+7aTrA@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.