All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>,
	Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 <B05799@freescale.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] gianfar: Revive SKB recycling
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:11:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091111001110.GF8817@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091111001036.GA28576@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>

Before calling gfar_clean_tx_ring() the driver grabs an irqsave
spinlock, and then tries to recycle skbs. But since
skb_recycle_check() returns 0 with IRQs disabled, we'll never
recycle any skbs.

It appears that gfar_clean_tx_ring() and gfar_start_xmit() are
mostly idependent and can work in parallel, except when they
modify num_txbdfree.

So we can drop the lock from most sections and thus fix the skb
recycling.

Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
---
 drivers/net/gianfar.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/gianfar.c b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
index fde430a..16def13 100644
--- a/drivers/net/gianfar.c
+++ b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
@@ -1928,14 +1928,11 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 	/* total number of fragments in the SKB */
 	nr_frags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&tx_queue->txlock, flags);
-
 	/* check if there is space to queue this packet */
 	if ((nr_frags+1) > tx_queue->num_txbdfree) {
 		/* no space, stop the queue */
 		netif_tx_stop_queue(txq);
 		dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx_queue->txlock, flags);
 		return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
 	}
 
@@ -1999,6 +1996,20 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 	lstatus |= BD_LFLAG(TXBD_CRC | TXBD_READY) | skb_headlen(skb);
 
 	/*
+	 * We can work in parallel with gfar_clean_tx_ring(), except
+	 * when modifying num_txbdfree. Note that we didn't grab the lock
+	 * when we were reading the num_txbdfree and checking for available
+	 * space, that's because outside of this function it can only grow,
+	 * and once we've got needed space, it cannot suddenly disappear.
+	 *
+	 * The lock also protects us from gfar_error(), which can modify
+	 * regs->tstat and thus retrigger the transfers, which is why we
+	 * also must grab the lock before setting ready bit for the first
+	 * to be transmitted BD.
+	 */
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&tx_queue->txlock, flags);
+
+	/*
 	 * The powerpc-specific eieio() is used, as wmb() has too strong
 	 * semantics (it requires synchronization between cacheable and
 	 * uncacheable mappings, which eieio doesn't provide and which we
@@ -2225,6 +2236,8 @@ static int gfar_clean_tx_ring(struct gfar_priv_tx_q *tx_queue)
 	skb_dirtytx = tx_queue->skb_dirtytx;
 
 	while ((skb = tx_queue->tx_skbuff[skb_dirtytx])) {
+		unsigned long flags;
+
 		frags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
 		lbdp = skip_txbd(bdp, frags, base, tx_ring_size);
 
@@ -2269,7 +2282,9 @@ static int gfar_clean_tx_ring(struct gfar_priv_tx_q *tx_queue)
 			TX_RING_MOD_MASK(tx_ring_size);
 
 		howmany++;
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&tx_queue->txlock, flags);
 		tx_queue->num_txbdfree += frags + 1;
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx_queue->txlock, flags);
 	}
 
 	/* If we freed a buffer, we can restart transmission, if necessary */
@@ -2548,7 +2563,6 @@ static int gfar_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 	int tx_cleaned = 0, i, left_over_budget = budget;
 	unsigned long serviced_queues = 0;
 	int num_queues = 0;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	num_queues = gfargrp->num_rx_queues;
 	budget_per_queue = budget/num_queues;
@@ -2568,14 +2582,7 @@ static int gfar_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 			rx_queue = priv->rx_queue[i];
 			tx_queue = priv->tx_queue[rx_queue->qindex];
 
-			/* If we fail to get the lock,
-			 * don't bother with the TX BDs */
-			if (spin_trylock_irqsave(&tx_queue->txlock, flags)) {
-				tx_cleaned += gfar_clean_tx_ring(tx_queue);
-				spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx_queue->txlock,
-							flags);
-			}
-
+			tx_cleaned += gfar_clean_tx_ring(tx_queue);
 			rx_cleaned_per_queue = gfar_clean_rx_ring(rx_queue,
 							budget_per_queue);
 			rx_cleaned += rx_cleaned_per_queue;
-- 
1.6.3.3

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andy Fleming <afleming@freescale.com>, Jon Loeliger <jdl@jdl.com>,
	Kumar Gopalpet-B05799 <B05799@freescale.com>,
	Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>,
	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] gianfar: Revive SKB recycling
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:11:10 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091111001110.GF8817@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091111001036.GA28576@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>

Before calling gfar_clean_tx_ring() the driver grabs an irqsave
spinlock, and then tries to recycle skbs. But since
skb_recycle_check() returns 0 with IRQs disabled, we'll never
recycle any skbs.

It appears that gfar_clean_tx_ring() and gfar_start_xmit() are
mostly idependent and can work in parallel, except when they
modify num_txbdfree.

So we can drop the lock from most sections and thus fix the skb
recycling.

Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
---
 drivers/net/gianfar.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/gianfar.c b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
index fde430a..16def13 100644
--- a/drivers/net/gianfar.c
+++ b/drivers/net/gianfar.c
@@ -1928,14 +1928,11 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 	/* total number of fragments in the SKB */
 	nr_frags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(&tx_queue->txlock, flags);
-
 	/* check if there is space to queue this packet */
 	if ((nr_frags+1) > tx_queue->num_txbdfree) {
 		/* no space, stop the queue */
 		netif_tx_stop_queue(txq);
 		dev->stats.tx_fifo_errors++;
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx_queue->txlock, flags);
 		return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
 	}
 
@@ -1999,6 +1996,20 @@ static int gfar_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 	lstatus |= BD_LFLAG(TXBD_CRC | TXBD_READY) | skb_headlen(skb);
 
 	/*
+	 * We can work in parallel with gfar_clean_tx_ring(), except
+	 * when modifying num_txbdfree. Note that we didn't grab the lock
+	 * when we were reading the num_txbdfree and checking for available
+	 * space, that's because outside of this function it can only grow,
+	 * and once we've got needed space, it cannot suddenly disappear.
+	 *
+	 * The lock also protects us from gfar_error(), which can modify
+	 * regs->tstat and thus retrigger the transfers, which is why we
+	 * also must grab the lock before setting ready bit for the first
+	 * to be transmitted BD.
+	 */
+	spin_lock_irqsave(&tx_queue->txlock, flags);
+
+	/*
 	 * The powerpc-specific eieio() is used, as wmb() has too strong
 	 * semantics (it requires synchronization between cacheable and
 	 * uncacheable mappings, which eieio doesn't provide and which we
@@ -2225,6 +2236,8 @@ static int gfar_clean_tx_ring(struct gfar_priv_tx_q *tx_queue)
 	skb_dirtytx = tx_queue->skb_dirtytx;
 
 	while ((skb = tx_queue->tx_skbuff[skb_dirtytx])) {
+		unsigned long flags;
+
 		frags = skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags;
 		lbdp = skip_txbd(bdp, frags, base, tx_ring_size);
 
@@ -2269,7 +2282,9 @@ static int gfar_clean_tx_ring(struct gfar_priv_tx_q *tx_queue)
 			TX_RING_MOD_MASK(tx_ring_size);
 
 		howmany++;
+		spin_lock_irqsave(&tx_queue->txlock, flags);
 		tx_queue->num_txbdfree += frags + 1;
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx_queue->txlock, flags);
 	}
 
 	/* If we freed a buffer, we can restart transmission, if necessary */
@@ -2548,7 +2563,6 @@ static int gfar_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 	int tx_cleaned = 0, i, left_over_budget = budget;
 	unsigned long serviced_queues = 0;
 	int num_queues = 0;
-	unsigned long flags;
 
 	num_queues = gfargrp->num_rx_queues;
 	budget_per_queue = budget/num_queues;
@@ -2568,14 +2582,7 @@ static int gfar_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
 			rx_queue = priv->rx_queue[i];
 			tx_queue = priv->tx_queue[rx_queue->qindex];
 
-			/* If we fail to get the lock,
-			 * don't bother with the TX BDs */
-			if (spin_trylock_irqsave(&tx_queue->txlock, flags)) {
-				tx_cleaned += gfar_clean_tx_ring(tx_queue);
-				spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tx_queue->txlock,
-							flags);
-			}
-
+			tx_cleaned += gfar_clean_tx_ring(tx_queue);
 			rx_cleaned_per_queue = gfar_clean_rx_ring(rx_queue,
 							budget_per_queue);
 			rx_cleaned += rx_cleaned_per_queue;
-- 
1.6.3.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-11  0:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-11  0:10 [PATCH 0/6] gianfar: Some fixes Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-11  0:10 ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-11  0:11 ` [PATCH 1/6] skbuff: Do not allow skb recycling with disabled IRQs Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-11  0:11   ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-11  0:11 ` [PATCH 2/6] gianfar: Remove 'Interrupt problem!' warning Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-11  0:11   ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-11  0:11 ` [PATCH 3/6] gianfar: Fix build with CONFIG_PM=y Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-11  0:11   ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-11  4:27   ` Kumar Gopalpet-B05799
2009-11-11  4:27     ` Kumar Gopalpet-B05799
2009-11-11  0:11 ` [PATCH 4/6] gianfar: Fix thinko in gfar_set_rx_stash_index() Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-11  0:11   ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-11  0:11 ` [PATCH 5/6] gianfar: Fix race between gfar_error() and gfar_start_xmit() Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-11  0:11   ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-11  0:11 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2009-11-11  0:11   ` [PATCH 6/6] gianfar: Revive SKB recycling Anton Vorontsov
2009-11-11  4:20   ` Kumar Gopalpet-B05799
2009-11-11  4:20     ` Kumar Gopalpet-B05799
2009-11-11 15:16 ` [PATCH 0/6] gianfar: Some fixes Kumar Gala
2009-11-12  3:04   ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091111001110.GF8817@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
    --to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
    --cc=B05799@freescale.com \
    --cc=afleming@freescale.com \
    --cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jdl@jdl.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.