All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] b43: Rewrite DMA Tx status handling sanity checks
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:30:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200911231130.23873.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B09E691.8020205@lwfinger.net>

On Monday 23 November 2009 02:34:09 Larry Finger wrote:
> On 11/19/2009 03:24 PM, Michael Buesch wrote:
> > This rewrites the error handling policies in the TX status handler.
> > It tries to be error-tolerant as in "try hard to not crash the machine".
> > It won't recover from errors (that are bugs in the firmware or driver),
> > because that's impossible. However, it will return a more or less useful
> > error message and bail out. It also tries hard to use rate-limited messages
> > to not flood the syslog in case of a failure.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
> > 
> > ---
> 
> Tested and ACKed by Larry Finger. Not only does this improve the error handling
> for b43, but it also appears to fix the skb == NULL error that I experienced
> with the open-source firmware.

I don't think there's any way it can fix this. The patch doesn't change the
code behavior. It just changes the sanity checks, that under normal circumstances
should never trigger.

> John - please push this into wireless-testing. It should also go to 2.6.32, but
> it is likely too large for the current stage. At least Cc it to stable.

Don't put it into stable. This is not a fix.
I don't think it's suitable for 2.6.32 at this stage, too.

-- 
Greetings, Michael.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-11-23 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-19 21:24 [PATCH] b43: Rewrite DMA Tx status handling sanity checks Michael Buesch
2009-11-22 17:52 ` Michael Buesch
2009-11-22 18:11   ` Larry Finger
2009-11-22 18:19     ` Michael Buesch
2009-11-23  1:34 ` Larry Finger
2009-11-23 10:30   ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2009-11-23  4:45 ` Larry Finger
2009-11-23 10:49   ` Michael Buesch
2009-11-23 11:00     ` Francesco Gringoli
2009-11-23 11:05       ` Michael Buesch
2009-11-23 15:41       ` Larry Finger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200911231130.23873.mb@bu3sch.de \
    --to=mb@bu3sch.de \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.