Re: Just a cosmetic question about grub_vprintf()?

[Robert Millan <rmh@aybabtu.com>]

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 01:10:11PM +0000, rubisher wrote:
> But as far as the 1st parameter of grub_vsprintf is a pointer,
> wouldn't it be better to write:
> --- kern/misc.c.orig	2009-11-22 13:07:22.000000000 +0000
> +++ kern/misc.c	2009-11-22 13:07:51.000000000 +0000
> @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
>  {
>    int ret;
>
> -  ret = grub_vsprintf (0, fmt, args);
> +  ret = grub_vsprintf (NULL, fmt, args);
>    return ret;
>  }

Yes.  But we have many of those, so we don't go huntin' them.  If you'd
like to help us, a patch that does this change in bulk would be welcome.

Thanks

-- 
Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."