From: Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>
To: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>,
dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drop 80-character limit in checkpatch.pl
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 12:59:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091216195935.GA551@ldl.fc.hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0912151656010.29183@hs20-bc2-1.build.redhat.com>
I've no comments on the actual patch but...
* Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>:
> Drop 80-character limit in checkpatch.pl
>
> Serious issues:
> ===============
>
> (1) The code is hard to edit with common text editors
You mention vi; most distros provide vim these days.
In my .vimrc, I have:
set ai
set si
That helps a bit.
> (2) Grepping the code is unreliable
Reviewers (at least in my part of the kernel) have been
requesting that user-visible (and thus developer greppable)
output be combined on one line precisely for this reason.
We've been rejecting patches that unnecessarily break up these
strings at 80 cols.
> But some maintainers take output of the script checkpatch.pl
> dogmatically, requiring that every new work must pass the
> script without a warning.
This is the real problem. And I think the solution is to lobby
your maintainer.
fwiw,
/ac
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-16 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-15 21:57 [PATCH] Drop 80-character limit in checkpatch.pl Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-15 21:57 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-15 22:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-15 22:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-17 9:31 ` Américo Wang
2009-12-17 15:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 15:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 15:18 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-17 15:18 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-17 15:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 16:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-17 16:08 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-17 16:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 16:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 16:30 ` Janakiram Sistla
2009-12-17 18:05 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-18 13:31 ` Pádraig Brady
2009-12-18 16:32 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-18 16:32 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-18 22:33 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-18 13:04 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-12-18 13:04 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-12-18 13:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-18 13:55 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-18 14:39 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-18 14:39 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-27 17:15 ` Jon Smirl
2009-12-21 6:32 ` Paul Mundt
2009-12-22 15:10 ` Jiri Kosina
2009-12-16 10:58 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-16 19:59 ` Alex Chiang [this message]
2009-12-17 6:12 ` Paul Mundt
2009-12-17 6:12 ` Paul Mundt
2009-12-17 8:34 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-17 23:29 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-17 23:29 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-17 23:35 ` Al Viro
2009-12-18 4:29 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-12-18 5:12 ` [PATCH] scripts/checkpatch.pl: Change long line warning to 105 chars Joe Perches
2009-12-18 5:57 ` Paul Mundt
2009-12-18 5:57 ` Paul Mundt
2009-12-18 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-18 17:54 ` Joe Perches
2009-12-18 18:41 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-18 14:37 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-18 14:37 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-18 15:12 ` Alasdair G Kergon
2009-12-18 15:12 ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2009-12-18 16:58 ` Randy Dunlap
2009-12-18 16:58 ` [dm-devel] " Randy Dunlap
2009-12-18 17:12 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-18 17:12 ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-18 22:36 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-18 17:31 ` Joe Perches
2009-12-18 17:31 ` Joe Perches
2009-12-18 14:28 ` [PATCH] Drop 80-character limit in checkpatch.pl Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-18 14:28 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-18 14:52 ` kevin granade
2009-12-18 16:43 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-18 16:43 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-18 16:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-18 16:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-18 17:09 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-18 17:09 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-18 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-18 17:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-18 21:15 ` kevin granade
2009-12-18 15:11 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-17 22:37 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-17 22:37 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-17 23:12 ` Paul Mundt
2009-12-17 23:12 ` Paul Mundt
2009-12-17 23:33 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-17 23:33 ` Mikulas Patocka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091216195935.GA551@ldl.fc.hp.com \
--to=achiang@hp.com \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.