All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com, "Mikulas Patocka" <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Alasdair G Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drop 80-character limit in checkpatch.pl
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:18:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912171618.32882.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0912170713390.17868@localhost.localdomain>

On Thursday 17 December 2009 04:14:37 pm Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Américo Wang wrote:
> > 
> > I like this patch, this is actually what I wanted to do.
> 
> I have nothing against a switch, but it had better default to off.
> 
> The whole 80-char limit is insane. It results in insane "fixes". Just 
> about every time somebody "improves" a patch due to the warning, the 
> result is worse than the original patch.

Examples? :)

--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Américo Wang" <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	"Mikulas Patocka" <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Alasdair G Kergon" <agk@redhat.com>,
	dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Drop 80-character limit in checkpatch.pl
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 16:18:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200912171618.32882.bzolnier@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0912170713390.17868@localhost.localdomain>

On Thursday 17 December 2009 04:14:37 pm Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2009, Américo Wang wrote:
> > 
> > I like this patch, this is actually what I wanted to do.
> 
> I have nothing against a switch, but it had better default to off.
> 
> The whole 80-char limit is insane. It results in insane "fixes". Just 
> about every time somebody "improves" a patch due to the warning, the 
> result is worse than the original patch.

Examples? :)

--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

  reply	other threads:[~2009-12-17 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-15 21:57 [PATCH] Drop 80-character limit in checkpatch.pl Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-15 21:57 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-15 22:26 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-15 22:26   ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-17  9:31   ` Américo Wang
2009-12-17 15:14     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 15:14       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 15:18       ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2009-12-17 15:18         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-17 15:37         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 16:08           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-17 16:08             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-17 16:21             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 16:21               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-17 16:30               ` Janakiram Sistla
2009-12-17 18:05               ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-18 13:31               ` Pádraig Brady
2009-12-18 16:32               ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-18 16:32                 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-18 22:33                 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-18 13:04         ` Jiri Kosina
2009-12-18 13:04           ` Jiri Kosina
2009-12-18 13:55           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-18 13:55             ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-18 14:39             ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-18 14:39               ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-27 17:15             ` Jon Smirl
2009-12-21  6:32           ` Paul Mundt
2009-12-22 15:10             ` Jiri Kosina
2009-12-16 10:58 ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-16 19:59 ` Alex Chiang
2009-12-17  6:12 ` Paul Mundt
2009-12-17  6:12   ` Paul Mundt
2009-12-17  8:34   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-17 23:29     ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-17 23:29       ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-17 23:35       ` Al Viro
2009-12-18  4:29       ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2009-12-18  5:12         ` [PATCH] scripts/checkpatch.pl: Change long line warning to 105 chars Joe Perches
2009-12-18  5:57           ` Paul Mundt
2009-12-18  5:57             ` Paul Mundt
2009-12-18 17:43             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-18 17:54               ` Joe Perches
2009-12-18 18:41               ` Andi Kleen
2009-12-18 14:37           ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-18 14:37             ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-18 15:12             ` Alasdair G Kergon
2009-12-18 15:12               ` [dm-devel] " Alasdair G Kergon
2009-12-18 16:58               ` Randy Dunlap
2009-12-18 16:58                 ` [dm-devel] " Randy Dunlap
2009-12-18 17:12                 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-18 17:12                   ` [dm-devel] " Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-18 22:36                   ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-18 17:31             ` Joe Perches
2009-12-18 17:31               ` Joe Perches
2009-12-18 14:28         ` [PATCH] Drop 80-character limit in checkpatch.pl Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-18 14:28           ` Krzysztof Halasa
2009-12-18 14:52           ` kevin granade
2009-12-18 16:43             ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-18 16:43               ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-18 16:50               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-18 16:50                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-18 17:09                 ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-18 17:09                   ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-18 17:28                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-18 17:28                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-12-18 21:15               ` kevin granade
2009-12-18 15:11           ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-12-17 22:37   ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-17 22:37     ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-17 23:12     ` Paul Mundt
2009-12-17 23:12       ` Paul Mundt
2009-12-17 23:33       ` Mikulas Patocka
2009-12-17 23:33         ` Mikulas Patocka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200912171618.32882.bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --to=bzolnier@gmail.com \
    --cc=agk@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.