* [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms
@ 2010-01-25 9:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2010-01-25 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Jean Delvare, Ben Dooks
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
---
Hello,
I wonder if it makes sence to split the "I2C SUBSYSTEM" entry into
something like:
I2C SUBSYSTEM (PC drivers, core)
M: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
L: ...
W: ...
T: quilt ...
S: ...
F: Documentation/i2c/
F: drivers/i2c/
F: include/linux/i2c.h
F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
I2C SUBSYSTEM (embedded platforms)
M: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
L: ...
W: ...
T: git ...
S: ...
F: drivers/i2c/
F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
(I'm not entirely sure about the file patterns for the 2nd entry.)
Best regards
Uwe
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 1858646..a1813fd 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -2629,6 +2629,7 @@ M: "Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@fluff.org>
L: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
W: http://i2c.wiki.kernel.org/
T: quilt kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/
+T: git git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git
S: Maintained
F: Documentation/i2c/
F: drivers/i2c/
--
1.6.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms
@ 2010-01-25 9:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2010-01-25 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-i2c; +Cc: linux-kernel, Jean Delvare, Ben Dooks
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
---
Hello,
I wonder if it makes sence to split the "I2C SUBSYSTEM" entry into
something like:
I2C SUBSYSTEM (PC drivers, core)
M: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
L: ...
W: ...
T: quilt ...
S: ...
F: Documentation/i2c/
F: drivers/i2c/
F: include/linux/i2c.h
F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
I2C SUBSYSTEM (embedded platforms)
M: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
L: ...
W: ...
T: git ...
S: ...
F: drivers/i2c/
F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
(I'm not entirely sure about the file patterns for the 2nd entry.)
Best regards
Uwe
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 1858646..a1813fd 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -2629,6 +2629,7 @@ M: "Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@fluff.org>
L: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
W: http://i2c.wiki.kernel.org/
T: quilt kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/
+T: git git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git
S: Maintained
F: Documentation/i2c/
F: drivers/i2c/
--
1.6.6
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1264411234-5400-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms
2010-01-25 9:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2010-01-25 10:10 ` Jean Delvare
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-01-25 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uwe Kleine-König
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Ben Dooks
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:20:34 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if it makes sence to split the "I2C SUBSYSTEM" entry into
> something like:
>
> I2C SUBSYSTEM (PC drivers, core)
> M: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> L: ...
> W: ...
> T: quilt ...
> S: ...
> F: Documentation/i2c/
> F: drivers/i2c/
> F: include/linux/i2c.h
> F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
>
> I2C SUBSYSTEM (embedded platforms)
> M: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
> L: ...
> W: ...
> T: git ...
> S: ...
> F: drivers/i2c/
> F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
>
> (I'm not entirely sure about the file patterns for the 2nd entry.)
I'm not sure what value it adds, compared to having a single entry as
we have today. scripts/get_maintainer.pl will produce the same output,
won't it?
This script (and our minds) being directory-driven, I suspect that the
only efficient way to split the entries would be to first move all i2c bus
driver for embedded platforms to a separate subdirectory. I'm leaving
it to Ben and the embedded community to decide whether they want to do
that or not.
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1858646..a1813fd 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -2629,6 +2629,7 @@ M: "Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> L: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> W: http://i2c.wiki.kernel.org/
> T: quilt kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/
> +T: git git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git
> S: Maintained
> F: Documentation/i2c/
> F: drivers/i2c/
Yes, please!
Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
--
Jean Delvare
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms
@ 2010-01-25 10:10 ` Jean Delvare
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-01-25 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uwe Kleine-König; +Cc: linux-i2c, linux-kernel, Ben Dooks
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:20:34 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> ---
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if it makes sence to split the "I2C SUBSYSTEM" entry into
> something like:
>
> I2C SUBSYSTEM (PC drivers, core)
> M: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
> L: ...
> W: ...
> T: quilt ...
> S: ...
> F: Documentation/i2c/
> F: drivers/i2c/
> F: include/linux/i2c.h
> F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
>
> I2C SUBSYSTEM (embedded platforms)
> M: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> L: ...
> W: ...
> T: git ...
> S: ...
> F: drivers/i2c/
> F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
>
> (I'm not entirely sure about the file patterns for the 2nd entry.)
I'm not sure what value it adds, compared to having a single entry as
we have today. scripts/get_maintainer.pl will produce the same output,
won't it?
This script (and our minds) being directory-driven, I suspect that the
only efficient way to split the entries would be to first move all i2c bus
driver for embedded platforms to a separate subdirectory. I'm leaving
it to Ben and the embedded community to decide whether they want to do
that or not.
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1858646..a1813fd 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -2629,6 +2629,7 @@ M: "Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> L: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
> W: http://i2c.wiki.kernel.org/
> T: quilt kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/
> +T: git git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git
> S: Maintained
> F: Documentation/i2c/
> F: drivers/i2c/
Yes, please!
Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
--
Jean Delvare
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <20100125111055.05ccedf2-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms
2010-01-25 10:10 ` Jean Delvare
@ 2010-01-26 14:38 ` Ben Dooks
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2010-01-26 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jean Delvare
Cc: Uwe Kleine-K??nig, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Ben Dooks
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:10:55AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:20:34 +0100, Uwe Kleine-K??nig wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K??nig <u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
> > Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> > Hello,
> >
> > I wonder if it makes sence to split the "I2C SUBSYSTEM" entry into
> > something like:
> >
> > I2C SUBSYSTEM (PC drivers, core)
> > M: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> > L: ...
> > W: ...
> > T: quilt ...
> > S: ...
> > F: Documentation/i2c/
> > F: drivers/i2c/
> > F: include/linux/i2c.h
> > F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
> >
> > I2C SUBSYSTEM (embedded platforms)
> > M: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
> > L: ...
> > W: ...
> > T: git ...
> > S: ...
> > F: drivers/i2c/
> > F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
> >
> > (I'm not entirely sure about the file patterns for the 2nd entry.)
>
> I'm not sure what value it adds, compared to having a single entry as
> we have today. scripts/get_maintainer.pl will produce the same output,
> won't it?
>
> This script (and our minds) being directory-driven, I suspect that the
> only efficient way to split the entries would be to first move all i2c bus
> driver for embedded platforms to a separate subdirectory. I'm leaving
> it to Ben and the embedded community to decide whether they want to do
> that or not.
I'd much prefer to see just the one directory of i2c drivers, the
minor point being people silly enough to load modules by explicit path
and the second is that having all the drivers in one place makes it
easier to update them when changing something in the core...
> >
> > Best regards
> > Uwe
> >
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 1858646..a1813fd 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -2629,6 +2629,7 @@ M: "Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
> > L: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > W: http://i2c.wiki.kernel.org/
> > T: quilt kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/
> > +T: git git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git
> > S: Maintained
> > F: Documentation/i2c/
> > F: drivers/i2c/
>
> Yes, please!
>
> Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Ben (ben-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms
@ 2010-01-26 14:38 ` Ben Dooks
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2010-01-26 14:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jean Delvare; +Cc: Uwe Kleine-K??nig, linux-i2c, linux-kernel, Ben Dooks
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:10:55AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:20:34 +0100, Uwe Kleine-K??nig wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K??nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> > ---
> > Hello,
> >
> > I wonder if it makes sence to split the "I2C SUBSYSTEM" entry into
> > something like:
> >
> > I2C SUBSYSTEM (PC drivers, core)
> > M: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
> > L: ...
> > W: ...
> > T: quilt ...
> > S: ...
> > F: Documentation/i2c/
> > F: drivers/i2c/
> > F: include/linux/i2c.h
> > F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
> >
> > I2C SUBSYSTEM (embedded platforms)
> > M: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> > L: ...
> > W: ...
> > T: git ...
> > S: ...
> > F: drivers/i2c/
> > F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
> >
> > (I'm not entirely sure about the file patterns for the 2nd entry.)
>
> I'm not sure what value it adds, compared to having a single entry as
> we have today. scripts/get_maintainer.pl will produce the same output,
> won't it?
>
> This script (and our minds) being directory-driven, I suspect that the
> only efficient way to split the entries would be to first move all i2c bus
> driver for embedded platforms to a separate subdirectory. I'm leaving
> it to Ben and the embedded community to decide whether they want to do
> that or not.
I'd much prefer to see just the one directory of i2c drivers, the
minor point being people silly enough to load modules by explicit path
and the second is that having all the drivers in one place makes it
easier to update them when changing something in the core...
> >
> > Best regards
> > Uwe
> >
> > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 1858646..a1813fd 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -2629,6 +2629,7 @@ M: "Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> > L: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
> > W: http://i2c.wiki.kernel.org/
> > T: quilt kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/
> > +T: git git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git
> > S: Maintained
> > F: Documentation/i2c/
> > F: drivers/i2c/
>
> Yes, please!
>
> Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms
2010-01-26 14:38 ` Ben Dooks
@ 2010-01-26 15:25 ` Jean Delvare
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-01-26 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: Uwe Kleine-Koenig, linux-i2c, linux-kernel, Ben Dooks
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:38:30 +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:10:55AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:20:34 +0100, Uwe Kleine-K??nig wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K??nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > > Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> > > ---
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I wonder if it makes sence to split the "I2C SUBSYSTEM" entry into
> > > something like:
> > >
> > > I2C SUBSYSTEM (PC drivers, core)
> > > M: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
> > > L: ...
> > > W: ...
> > > T: quilt ...
> > > S: ...
> > > F: Documentation/i2c/
> > > F: drivers/i2c/
> > > F: include/linux/i2c.h
> > > F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
> > >
> > > I2C SUBSYSTEM (embedded platforms)
> > > M: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> > > L: ...
> > > W: ...
> > > T: git ...
> > > S: ...
> > > F: drivers/i2c/
> > > F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
> > >
> > > (I'm not entirely sure about the file patterns for the 2nd entry.)
> >
> > I'm not sure what value it adds, compared to having a single entry as
> > we have today. scripts/get_maintainer.pl will produce the same output,
> > won't it?
> >
> > This script (and our minds) being directory-driven, I suspect that the
> > only efficient way to split the entries would be to first move all i2c bus
> > driver for embedded platforms to a separate subdirectory. I'm leaving
> > it to Ben and the embedded community to decide whether they want to do
> > that or not.
>
> I'd much prefer to see just the one directory of i2c drivers, the
> minor point being people silly enough to load modules by explicit path
Never thought of that, but I wouldn't care. There is no good reason to
do this.
> and the second is that having all the drivers in one place makes it
> easier to update them when changing something in the core...
This doesn't seem to be a blocker either. For one thing, i2c
subsystem-wide changes tend to affect chip drivers more than bus
drivers. And even then, looking for drivers in 2 directories doesn't
seem much harder than looking into just one, especially when said 2
directories live next to each other.
So I see no objection to a mass move of all embedded/system i2c bus
drivers to a separate sub-directory.
--
Jean Delvare
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms
@ 2010-01-26 15:25 ` Jean Delvare
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-01-26 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Dooks; +Cc: Uwe Kleine-Koenig, linux-i2c, linux-kernel, Ben Dooks
On Tue, 26 Jan 2010 14:38:30 +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:10:55AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:20:34 +0100, Uwe Kleine-K??nig wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K??nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > > Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> > > ---
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I wonder if it makes sence to split the "I2C SUBSYSTEM" entry into
> > > something like:
> > >
> > > I2C SUBSYSTEM (PC drivers, core)
> > > M: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
> > > L: ...
> > > W: ...
> > > T: quilt ...
> > > S: ...
> > > F: Documentation/i2c/
> > > F: drivers/i2c/
> > > F: include/linux/i2c.h
> > > F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
> > >
> > > I2C SUBSYSTEM (embedded platforms)
> > > M: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> > > L: ...
> > > W: ...
> > > T: git ...
> > > S: ...
> > > F: drivers/i2c/
> > > F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
> > >
> > > (I'm not entirely sure about the file patterns for the 2nd entry.)
> >
> > I'm not sure what value it adds, compared to having a single entry as
> > we have today. scripts/get_maintainer.pl will produce the same output,
> > won't it?
> >
> > This script (and our minds) being directory-driven, I suspect that the
> > only efficient way to split the entries would be to first move all i2c bus
> > driver for embedded platforms to a separate subdirectory. I'm leaving
> > it to Ben and the embedded community to decide whether they want to do
> > that or not.
>
> I'd much prefer to see just the one directory of i2c drivers, the
> minor point being people silly enough to load modules by explicit path
Never thought of that, but I wouldn't care. There is no good reason to
do this.
> and the second is that having all the drivers in one place makes it
> easier to update them when changing something in the core...
This doesn't seem to be a blocker either. For one thing, i2c
subsystem-wide changes tend to affect chip drivers more than bus
drivers. And even then, looking for drivers in 2 directories doesn't
seem much harder than looking into just one, especially when said 2
directories live next to each other.
So I see no objection to a mass move of all embedded/system i2c bus
drivers to a separate sub-directory.
--
Jean Delvare
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms
2010-01-26 15:25 ` Jean Delvare
(?)
@ 2010-01-26 15:37 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20100126153759.GF4431-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
-1 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Wolfram Sang @ 2010-01-26 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jean Delvare; +Cc: Ben Dooks, Uwe Kleine-Koenig, linux-i2c, linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 620 bytes --]
> So I see no objection to a mass move of all embedded/system i2c bus
> drivers to a separate sub-directory.
And with the PCA9xxx-controllers? The ISA-driver into non-embedded and the
platform-driver into embedded? Hmmm...
And (in 80 years ;)) there might be just one I2C-maintainer taking care of them
all? Then, why the split?
I am all for taking the embedded-burden away from you, just I am not too fond
of this idea.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 197 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms
2010-01-25 9:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2010-01-26 14:37 ` Ben Dooks
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2010-01-26 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uwe Kleine-K??nig
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Jean Delvare, Ben Dooks
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:20:34AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K??nig wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K??nig <u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if it makes sence to split the "I2C SUBSYSTEM" entry into
> something like:
>
> I2C SUBSYSTEM (PC drivers, core)
> M: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> L: ...
> W: ...
> T: quilt ...
> S: ...
> F: Documentation/i2c/
> F: drivers/i2c/
> F: include/linux/i2c.h
> F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
>
> I2C SUBSYSTEM (embedded platforms)
> M: Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
> L: ...
> W: ...
> T: git ...
> S: ...
> F: drivers/i2c/
> F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
>
> (I'm not entirely sure about the file patterns for the 2nd entry.)
We might be able to add each driver individually, but that would mean
updating the entry with each driver added, and that sounds too much
like hard work (sorry, receipie for merge conflict)
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1858646..a1813fd 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -2629,6 +2629,7 @@ M: "Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
> L: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> W: http://i2c.wiki.kernel.org/
> T: quilt kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/
> +T: git git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git
> S: Maintained
> F: Documentation/i2c/
> F: drivers/i2c/
> --
> 1.6.6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Ben (ben-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms
@ 2010-01-26 14:37 ` Ben Dooks
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2010-01-26 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uwe Kleine-K??nig; +Cc: linux-i2c, linux-kernel, Jean Delvare, Ben Dooks
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:20:34AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K??nig wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K??nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> ---
> Hello,
>
> I wonder if it makes sence to split the "I2C SUBSYSTEM" entry into
> something like:
>
> I2C SUBSYSTEM (PC drivers, core)
> M: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
> L: ...
> W: ...
> T: quilt ...
> S: ...
> F: Documentation/i2c/
> F: drivers/i2c/
> F: include/linux/i2c.h
> F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
>
> I2C SUBSYSTEM (embedded platforms)
> M: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> L: ...
> W: ...
> T: git ...
> S: ...
> F: drivers/i2c/
> F: include/linux/i2c-*.h
>
> (I'm not entirely sure about the file patterns for the 2nd entry.)
We might be able to add each driver individually, but that would mean
updating the entry with each driver added, and that sounds too much
like hard work (sorry, receipie for merge conflict)
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1858646..a1813fd 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -2629,6 +2629,7 @@ M: "Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux@fluff.org>
> L: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
> W: http://i2c.wiki.kernel.org/
> T: quilt kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/
> +T: git git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git
> S: Maintained
> F: Documentation/i2c/
> F: drivers/i2c/
> --
> 1.6.6
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)
'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms
@ 2010-03-01 10:38 Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20100301113840.4d6b4e7d-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Jean Delvare @ 2010-03-01 10:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Uwe Kleine-König
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Ben Dooks, Joe Perches
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 10:07:14 +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 03:57:54PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:01:46PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > > Acked-by: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
> > > ---
> > > MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > > index 2533fc4..a3c936c 100644
> > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > @@ -2626,6 +2626,7 @@ M: "Ben Dooks (embedded platforms)" <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>
> > > L: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > > W: http://i2c.wiki.kernel.org/
> > > T: quilt kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jdelvare/linux-2.6/jdelvare-i2c/
> > > +T: git git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git
> >
> > This is wrong. This is the same tree which I pull ARM stuff from, so it
> > needs qualifying with a branch name.
> $(git ls-remote git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git) suggests two
> candidates:
>
> for-linus/i2c
> next-i2c
>
> And I think for now this is only parsed by humans and everbody should be
> able to notice that e.g. "next-s3c" doesn't contain i2c patches in the
> presence of the two above branches.
>
> So unless there is a syntax to specify more than one branch I suggest to
> keep it as is. Or should we only list next-i2c? Ben, what do you
> think?
I presume that for-linus/i2c is a temporary subset of next-i2c for
Linus' consumption. So we can ignore for-linus/i2c and only list
next-i2c.
> (Maybe we can just make it:
>
> T: git git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git for-linus/i2c
> T: git git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux.git next-i2c
>
> but this is a bit too much IMHO. (Who volunteers to list all branches
> of tip in MAINTAINERS? ;-))
>
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
--
Jean Delvare
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-22 21:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-01-25 9:20 [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add i2c tree for embedded platforms Uwe Kleine-König
2010-01-25 9:20 ` Uwe Kleine-König
[not found] ` <1264411234-5400-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-25 10:10 ` Jean Delvare
2010-01-25 10:10 ` Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20100125111055.05ccedf2-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-26 14:38 ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-26 14:38 ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-26 15:25 ` Jean Delvare
2010-01-26 15:25 ` Jean Delvare
2010-01-26 15:37 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20100126153759.GF4431-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-26 16:34 ` Jean Delvare
2010-01-26 16:34 ` Jean Delvare
2010-01-26 14:37 ` Ben Dooks
2010-01-26 14:37 ` Ben Dooks
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-03-01 10:38 [PATCH 3/3] " Jean Delvare
[not found] ` <20100301113840.4d6b4e7d-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-01 11:12 ` [PATCH] " Uwe Kleine-König
2010-03-01 11:12 ` Uwe Kleine-König
[not found] ` <1267441936-4432-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2010-03-22 21:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-03-22 21:03 ` Uwe Kleine-König
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.