* Re: pvops dom0: no sound after boot; possibly causedbyswiotlb
@ 2010-02-05 20:09 Ronny.Hegewald
2010-02-05 21:38 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Ronny.Hegewald @ 2010-02-05 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: konrad.wilk; +Cc: xen-devel
>> No, your first statement was correct. It would always return the same mask
>for 32-bit and 64-bit, because of the 32-bitness of the return-variable
>'dma_mask'.
>>
>> So the following patch maybe would be more appropriate?
>
>I think it isn't neccessary. The 'dmal_alloc_coherent_mask' returns an
>unsigned long. On 32-bit 'unsigned long' is a 4-byte value, and
>on 64-bit that is 8-byte value.
Oh yes, right, didnt thought about that ....
So I think your previous patch:
>http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-02/msg00038.html
>is correct as when it is compiled under 64-bit it would return a 64-bit
>value and when compiled under 32-bit, it would return a 32-bit value.
As it seems that the patch wasn't noticed i will resend it. Can i add a Reviewed-by (or Acked-by) from you to the patch, so it gets more attention?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: pvops dom0: no sound after boot; possibly causedbyswiotlb
2010-02-05 20:09 pvops dom0: no sound after boot; possibly causedbyswiotlb Ronny.Hegewald
@ 2010-02-05 21:38 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk @ 2010-02-05 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ronny.Hegewald; +Cc: xen-devel
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:09:03PM +0100, Ronny.Hegewald@online.de wrote:
> >> No, your first statement was correct. It would always return the same mask
> >for 32-bit and 64-bit, because of the 32-bitness of the return-variable
> >'dma_mask'.
> >>
> >> So the following patch maybe would be more appropriate?
> >
> >I think it isn't neccessary. The 'dmal_alloc_coherent_mask' returns an
> >unsigned long. On 32-bit 'unsigned long' is a 4-byte value, and
> >on 64-bit that is 8-byte value.
>
> Oh yes, right, didnt thought about that ....
>
> So I think your previous patch:
> >http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-02/msg00038.html
> >is correct as when it is compiled under 64-bit it would return a 64-bit
> >value and when compiled under 32-bit, it would return a 32-bit value.
>
> As it seems that the patch wasn't noticed i will resend it. Can i add a Reviewed-by (or Acked-by) from you to the patch, so it gets more attention?
Don't worry. Already pulled in:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=commit;h=d2de41169c662e95ff3585d3fcf3cc0055307f27
Thanks for your work finding the culprit _and_ coming with a patch. Much appreciated!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-02-05 21:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-02-05 20:09 pvops dom0: no sound after boot; possibly causedbyswiotlb Ronny.Hegewald
2010-02-05 21:38 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.