From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] of/gpio: Implement GPIOLIB notifier hooks
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 22:16:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100209191620.GA24539@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa41002090913t4c72a3b8o5fda68723bc8d089@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:13:11AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
> > +static int __init of_gpio_notifier_init(void)
> > +{
> > + return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&gpio_notifier, &of_gpio_nb);
> > +}
> > +arch_initcall(of_gpio_notifier_init);
>
> Another concern; if any gpio chips get registered before this
> arch_initcall (not sure if it is possible or not), then those chips
> won't get registered with the of gpio infrastructure.
Technically, it is possible, but registering usual GPIO controllers
in arch_initcall feels not quite right approach in the first place
(and, btw, it won't work most of the time, because even early drivers
do not register itself earlier than subsys_initcall).
And arch gpio controllers (like QE GPIO) are usually device-less,
and they use of_mm_gpiochip_add(), so we fully control them.
Plus I don't see any reason why we couldn't move
of_gpio_notifier_init() into, say, postcore_initcall, if we ever
need it.
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Bill Gatliff <bgat@billgatliff.com>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] of/gpio: Implement GPIOLIB notifier hooks
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 22:16:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100209191620.GA24539@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fa686aa41002090913t4c72a3b8o5fda68723bc8d089@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:13:11AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
> > +static int __init of_gpio_notifier_init(void)
> > +{
> > + return blocking_notifier_chain_register(&gpio_notifier, &of_gpio_nb);
> > +}
> > +arch_initcall(of_gpio_notifier_init);
>
> Another concern; if any gpio chips get registered before this
> arch_initcall (not sure if it is possible or not), then those chips
> won't get registered with the of gpio infrastructure.
Technically, it is possible, but registering usual GPIO controllers
in arch_initcall feels not quite right approach in the first place
(and, btw, it won't work most of the time, because even early drivers
do not register itself earlier than subsys_initcall).
And arch gpio controllers (like QE GPIO) are usually device-less,
and they use of_mm_gpiochip_add(), so we fully control them.
Plus I don't see any reason why we couldn't move
of_gpio_notifier_init() into, say, postcore_initcall, if we ever
need it.
Thanks,
--
Anton Vorontsov
email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com
irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-09 19:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-05 20:32 [PATCH v2 0/4] OF GPIO integration for I2C/SPI GPIO chips Anton Vorontsov
2010-02-05 20:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-02-05 20:32 ` [PATCH 1/4] gpiolib: Introduce chip addition/removal notifier Anton Vorontsov
2010-02-05 20:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-02-09 17:16 ` Grant Likely
2010-02-09 17:16 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-05 19:59 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-05 19:59 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-05 20:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-03-05 20:30 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-02-05 20:32 ` [PATCH 2/4] of/gpio: Add support for two-stage registration for the of_gpio_chips Anton Vorontsov
2010-02-05 20:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-02-05 20:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] of/gpio: Implement GPIOLIB notifier hooks Anton Vorontsov
2010-02-05 20:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-02-08 21:02 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-08 21:02 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-09 17:08 ` Grant Likely
2010-02-09 17:08 ` Grant Likely
2010-02-09 19:06 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-02-09 19:06 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-02-09 17:13 ` Grant Likely
2010-02-09 17:13 ` Grant Likely
2010-02-09 19:16 ` Anton Vorontsov [this message]
2010-02-09 19:16 ` Anton Vorontsov
[not found] ` <20100305120015.a2008f46.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <fa686aa41003051228w38579483yd4e95bb8eacf40f7@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20100305123527.d6d68e56.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2010-03-05 23:47 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-05 23:47 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-06 0:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-03-06 0:28 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-03-06 3:54 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-06 3:54 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-06 5:05 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-03-06 5:05 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-03-06 16:43 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-06 16:43 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-07 1:47 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-03-07 1:47 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-03-07 6:11 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-07 6:11 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-12 21:07 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-12 21:07 ` Andrew Morton
2010-03-12 21:38 ` Grant Likely
2010-03-12 21:38 ` Grant Likely
2010-04-30 17:45 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-04-30 17:45 ` Anton Vorontsov
2010-02-05 20:32 ` [PATCH 4/4] powerpc/mcu_mpc8349emitx: Remove OF GPIO handling stuff Anton Vorontsov
2010-02-05 20:32 ` Anton Vorontsov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-25 18:09 [PATCH 0/4] OF GPIO integration for I2C/SPI GPIO chips Anton Vorontsov
2010-01-25 18:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] of/gpio: Implement GPIOLIB notifier hooks Anton Vorontsov
2010-01-25 18:11 ` Anton Vorontsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20100209191620.GA24539@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru \
--to=avorontsov@ru.mvista.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bgat@billgatliff.com \
--cc=dbaryshkov@gmail.com \
--cc=dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.