From: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Jain <radical@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Make VM_MAX_READAHEAD a kernel parameter
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:05:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201002151005.05923.knikanth@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100211151651.GA8753@localhost>
On Thursday 11 February 2010 20:46:51 Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Nikanth,
>
> > From: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
> >
> > Add new kernel parameter "readahead", which would be used instead of the
> > value of VM_MAX_READAHEAD. If the parameter is not specified, the default
> > of 128kb would be used.
>
> The patch looks good to me, though it conflicts with my patches.
> Do you mind me including a modified version in my readahead patchset?
>
Sure, go ahead.
Thanks
Nikanth
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Ankit Jain <radical@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Make VM_MAX_READAHEAD a kernel parameter
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:05:05 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201002151005.05923.knikanth@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100211151651.GA8753@localhost>
On Thursday 11 February 2010 20:46:51 Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Nikanth,
>
> > From: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>
> >
> > Add new kernel parameter "readahead", which would be used instead of the
> > value of VM_MAX_READAHEAD. If the parameter is not specified, the default
> > of 128kb would be used.
>
> The patch looks good to me, though it conflicts with my patches.
> Do you mind me including a modified version in my readahead patchset?
>
Sure, go ahead.
Thanks
Nikanth
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-15 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-09 11:29 [PATCH] Make vm_max_readahead configurable at run-time Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-09 11:29 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-09 23:22 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-09 23:22 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-10 6:25 ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-10 6:25 ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-10 10:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-10 10:53 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-10 11:05 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-10 11:05 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-10 13:52 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-10 13:52 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-11 5:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-11 5:13 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-11 7:34 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-11 7:34 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-11 10:16 ` [PATCH v2] Make VM_MAX_READAHEAD a kernel parameter Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-11 10:16 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-11 11:15 ` Ankit Jain
2010-02-11 11:15 ` Ankit Jain
2010-02-11 11:45 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-11 11:45 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-11 15:16 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-11 15:16 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-15 4:35 ` Nikanth Karthikesan [this message]
2010-02-15 4:35 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-14 21:37 ` Dave Chinner
2010-02-14 21:37 ` Dave Chinner
2010-02-15 4:36 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-15 4:36 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-21 14:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-21 14:26 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-21 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-21 15:49 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-21 15:52 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-21 15:52 ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-22 8:16 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-02-22 8:16 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-02-23 2:25 ` Dave Chinner
2010-02-23 2:25 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201002151005.05923.knikanth@suse.de \
--to=knikanth@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=radical@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.