All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Ankit Jain <radical@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Make VM_MAX_READAHEAD a kernel parameter
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:16:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B823D70.80800@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100221142600.GA10036@localhost>



Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Nikanth,
> 
>> I didn't want to impose artificial restrictions. I think Wu's patch set would 
>> be adding some restrictions, like minimum readahead. He could fix it when he 
>> modifies the patch to include in his patch set.
> 
> OK, I imposed a larger bound -- 128MB.
> And values 1-4095 (more exactly: PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) are prohibited mainly to 
> catch "readahead=128" where the user really means to do 128 _KB_ readahead.
> 
> Christian, with this patch and more patches to scale down readahead
> size on small memory/device size, I guess it's no longer necessary to
> introduce a CONFIG_READAHEAD_SIZE?

Yes as I mentioned before a kernel parameter supersedes a config symbol 
in my opinion too.
-> agreed

> Thanks,
> Fengguang
> ---

-- 

Grüsse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt
IBM Linux Technology Center, System z Linux Performance

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@suse.de>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
	Ankit Jain <radical@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Make VM_MAX_READAHEAD a kernel parameter
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:16:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B823D70.80800@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100221142600.GA10036@localhost>



Wu Fengguang wrote:
> Nikanth,
> 
>> I didn't want to impose artificial restrictions. I think Wu's patch set would 
>> be adding some restrictions, like minimum readahead. He could fix it when he 
>> modifies the patch to include in his patch set.
> 
> OK, I imposed a larger bound -- 128MB.
> And values 1-4095 (more exactly: PAGE_CACHE_SIZE) are prohibited mainly to 
> catch "readahead=128" where the user really means to do 128 _KB_ readahead.
> 
> Christian, with this patch and more patches to scale down readahead
> size on small memory/device size, I guess it's no longer necessary to
> introduce a CONFIG_READAHEAD_SIZE?

Yes as I mentioned before a kernel parameter supersedes a config symbol 
in my opinion too.
-> agreed

> Thanks,
> Fengguang
> ---

-- 

Grusse / regards, Christian Ehrhardt
IBM Linux Technology Center, System z Linux Performance

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-02-22  8:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-02-09 11:29 [PATCH] Make vm_max_readahead configurable at run-time Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-09 11:29 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-09 23:22 ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-09 23:22   ` Andrew Morton
2010-02-10  6:25 ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-10  6:25   ` Balbir Singh
2010-02-10 10:53   ` [PATCH v2] " Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-10 10:53     ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-10 11:05     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-10 11:05       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-10 13:52       ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-10 13:52         ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-11  5:13         ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-11  5:13           ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-11  7:34           ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-11  7:34             ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-11 10:16             ` [PATCH v2] Make VM_MAX_READAHEAD a kernel parameter Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-11 10:16               ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-11 11:15               ` Ankit Jain
2010-02-11 11:15                 ` Ankit Jain
2010-02-11 11:45                 ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-11 11:45                   ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-11 15:16                   ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-11 15:16                     ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-15  4:35                     ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-15  4:35                       ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-14 21:37                   ` Dave Chinner
2010-02-14 21:37                     ` Dave Chinner
2010-02-15  4:36                     ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-15  4:36                       ` Nikanth Karthikesan
2010-02-21 14:26                       ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-21 14:26                         ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-21 15:49                         ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-21 15:49                           ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-21 15:52                         ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-21 15:52                           ` Wu Fengguang
2010-02-22  8:16                         ` Christian Ehrhardt [this message]
2010-02-22  8:16                           ` Christian Ehrhardt
2010-02-23  2:25                         ` Dave Chinner
2010-02-23  2:25                           ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B823D70.80800@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=knikanth@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=radical@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.